Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Please Im hoping anyone might have some advice. I have a 1999 chevy silverado 1500 with 5.3L. I am getting the code p1415. I got this code when it was on non-op 4years ago now I'm ready to fix. It popped up with o2 sensor codes in which I changed 2 so far. And now I'm back to the p1415 after changing both check valves and feeling air blow through the pump. Right now I'm a little lost on what I should do next

 

Posted

Make sure  there isn't another restriction in that line. I'd remove the whole metal line to the exhaust manifold and check it, and the manifold port for carbon buildup.  xx15 is the driver's side (bank 1)- xx16 would be passenger side.

 

Another thing to check is if the pump is even working. It should come on with a cold start. If not, you'll need a bi-directional scan tool to command the pump on. It will sound like a vacuum cleaner.  If the pump isn't working, make sure it's got power, and a good ground - check them with a headlight, NOT a test light - they need to be loaded for a good test. Make sure it runs at full speed, and produces a good volume of air. A bad power OR ground can make it run slower than it should, causing this code.

 

Another couple variables - make sure the new valve you installed is actually working properly. Alot of the parts sold at your local big chain auto parts stores are sub par to begin with. On that note, also check the new o2 sensor's operation. I only trust Denso or NTK / NGK sensors - anything else seems to be a crapshoot today. If the sensor is slow to react, it can set this code as well. Make sure the wiring to the secondary air system is solid, and that any connectors are clean, not full of green corrosion crusties, and that the female terminal side of the plug is tight, with good pin drag.

Posted
On 3/20/2021 at 5:16 AM, Jsdirt said:

Make sure  there isn't another restriction in that line. I'd remove the whole metal line to the exhaust manifold and check it, and the manifold port for carbon buildup.  xx15 is the driver's side (bank 1)- xx16 would be passenger side.

 

Another thing to check is if the pump is even working. It should come on with a cold start. If not, you'll need a bi-directional scan tool to command the pump on. It will sound like a vacuum cleaner.  If the pump isn't working, make sure it's got power, and a good ground - check them with a headlight, NOT a test light - they need to be loaded for a good test. Make sure it runs at full speed, and produces a good volume of air. A bad power OR ground can make it run slower than it should, causing this code.

 

Another couple variables - make sure the new valve you installed is actually working properly. Alot of the parts sold at your local big chain auto parts stores are sub par to begin with. On that note, also check the new o2 sensor's operation. I only trust Denso or NTK / NGK sensors - anything else seems to be a crapshoot today. If the sensor is slow to react, it can set this code as well. Make sure the wiring to the secondary air system is solid, and that any connectors are clean, not full of green corrosion crusties, and that the female terminal side of the plug is tight, with good pin drag.

Thanks js I'll try those. I just got my other o2 sensors in. They are not those brands though. So I'll change them and check the pump and work my way from there this weekend

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/20/2021 at 5:16 AM, Jsdirt said:

Make sure  there isn't another restriction in that line. I'd remove the whole metal line to the exhaust manifold and check it, and the manifold port for carbon buildup.  xx15 is the driver's side (bank 1)- xx16 would be passenger side.

 

Another thing to check is if the pump is even working. It should come on with a cold start. If not, you'll need a bi-directional scan tool to command the pump on. It will sound like a vacuum cleaner.  If the pump isn't working, make sure it's got power, and a good ground - check them with a headlight, NOT a test light - they need to be loaded for a good test. Make sure it runs at full speed, and produces a good volume of air. A bad power OR ground can make it run slower than it should, causing this code.

 

Another couple variables - make sure the new valve you installed is actually working properly. Alot of the parts sold at your local big chain auto parts stores are sub par to begin with. On that note, also check the new o2 sensor's operation. I only trust Denso or NTK / NGK sensors - anything else seems to be a crapshoot today. If the sensor is slow to react, it can set this code as well. Make sure the wiring to the secondary air system is solid, and that any connectors are clean, not full of green corrosion crusties, and that the female terminal side of the plug is tight, with good pin drag.

Hey js. So I replaced the o2 sensors on the passenger side. The brand is kax. The thread was melted on the output sensor but I got the other on somehow. Either way. Now on to the pump. I checked the pump. I took off the black rubber pipes and felt the wind first starting from the pump then took it to just before the valve. Felt it blowing a lot of air. It was humming pretty loud to from the air coming out. While it was on and the pump shut off I took my attention to check the valves and I can kinda feel air popping back when the pistons are firing or whatever makes it pop back there. Here's a couple of pics of the valves n stuff. 

16169052046333243745274101286836.jpg

16169052440731355032285893503439.jpg

Posted (edited)

I don't think you should feel any air from the exhaust side while it's running - could be a bad check valve there. I'm not super well versed on these bandaid emission setups since I don't see very many of them, so hopefully someone else will chime in ... that may be normal,  but since the pump is working, I would check for a restriction in the metal lines.

Edited by Jsdirt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...