Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Planning to do first oil change to 2022 refresh Silverado, can anyone confirm the oil filter part number? I can't determine if the refresh are the same filter as the 22 limited models or not.  What brand filter and oil is recommended? Search results are giving me AC Delco PF63 and/or AC Delco PF66 and 0W-20 for oil.  Any guidance would be appreciated.

Posted (edited)

Using the MyChevrolet website and going into parts for my VIN (22 refresh 5.3) shows PF63 as filter. Engine Oil as 0W20, both AC Delco. But I normally use Mobil1 oil (dexos 2 approved). Oil filters are usually ACdelco.

Edited by jaxcam02
  • Like 1
Posted

I am assuming you have a 5.3 or 6.2

 

For Oil, use 0w20 and just stay with name brand.

 

About every aftermarket filter will have better filtration than the ACDelco filters, but again go with what you are comfortable with and as long as you change your oil and filter regularly there shouldn't be an issue.

 

I prefer Castrol Full Syn with Titanium blah blah blah, and the FRAM Synthetic Filter.  Both have received top marks in truly independent testing, but again, just about any name brand oil and filter does fine as long as you change them both regularly. 

Posted
2 hours ago, RedLT said:

Planning to do first oil change to 2022 refresh Silverado, can anyone confirm the oil filter part number? I can't determine if the refresh are the same filter as the 22 limited models or not.  What brand filter and oil is recommended? Search results are giving me AC Delco PF63 and/or AC Delco PF66 and 0W-20 for oil.  Any guidance would be appreciated.

 

 

Same filters as 19-22.  You need to know what engine you have and then when you do, the maint. section right in your owners manual will tell you all you need to know.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 

Poor judgement on my end, it is 5.3L.  Thanks for the confirmation, it looks like it's oil change time this weekend.

Posted

To add to this, from my experience, Walmart has the best deals on the 5 qt jugs of oil, whatever brand you choose.  Normally, for me, it is 0w20 Mobil 1 5 qt jugs.  I get two, and just have some leftover for the next change.

Posted
2 hours ago, SteveCZ said:

To add to this, from my experience, Walmart has the best deals on the 5 qt jugs of oil, whatever brand you choose.  Normally, for me, it is 0w20 Mobil 1 5 qt jugs.  I get two, and just have some leftover for the next change.

Bingo.  Walmart is significantly cheaper than the auto parts stores around here with just about everything auto related.  Heck, even Rain-X for my windshield wiper fluid is $5 at the auto shop and $3 at Walmart.

 

For basic maintenance, Walmart for the win!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

Went with Mobile 1 and AC Delco PF63.  15mm socket and a offset oil wrench to complete the job. Thanks!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...