Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

in addition, there was a TSB for the u-bolt connections being too loose from factory, My truck was affected by this, it was corrected with no change to the vibration.

 

Well, at least it was vibrating more firmly afterwards. :crackup:

  • Like 1
Posted

First year I'll give them, 2nd year they should have found a fix. No way in hell should this still be a problem in year 3, I don't care what the problem was or is. If you haven't been able to correct it after 2 years you stop production until you figure it out.

The fix is this: You order a new 2017 model and cross your fingers that it will not vibrate, or at least not too much. :rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Posted

Wow, wonder who makes the rear ends for GM.

 

 

Probably the same company that makes the seat frames.

  • Like 1
Posted

I find it interesting the GM throws rear ends, drive shafts, and wheels and tires at the issue but it does not seem that the actual rear rotors have been replaced. Considering the wheels mount directly to the face of the rotors it seems that it's plausible that the rotors could be manufactured with just enough variance to cause a vibration.

Posted (edited)

I find it interesting the GM throws rear ends, drive shafts, and wheels and tires at the issue but it does not seem that the actual rear rotors have been replaced. Considering the wheels mount directly to the face of the rotors it seems that it's plausible that the rotors could be manufactured with just enough variance to cause a vibration.

Brake rotors must be properly balanced just like other rotating parts. And that's the big question: are they balanced at all, or even if, are they balanced correctly? One way to correct imbalance in rotors and wheels is to balance the wheels directly on the truck if you can find a place to do this, as it requires a special balancer which is rare nowadays. The downside is that you cannot rotate the wheels without having to rebalance them.

Edited by pm26
Posted

My truck had the shaking/vibration problem. In this huge post, there's been a few theories about the cause of these vibrations and it seems the fixes haven't worked well for all. So I decided to skip over the idea of bringing my truck into the dealership for the part swapping expedition and decided to live with the condition.

 

If you read carefully, I used the past tense describe the vibration issue. For the past month, I've been using gasoline from a 'top-tier' station (Costco). Initially, there was slightly lesser periods of vibration and the amplitudes were definitely on a smaller scale. For the past two weeks, I drove my truck as my daily driver to see if the vibrations would continue to lessen. Each fill up was at Costco. My daily commute is about 170 miles. Today, my entire trip was vibration free, a first. It was a gradual process but this is my theory: the 5.3L engine must suffer with carbon deposits on the surfaces of the valves (and other components) and using gasoline without the higher levels of detergents found in the top tier gasoline more than likely assists with gunk forming on the valves (and other components). I have just over 5400 miles on my truck and the first vibrations became noticeable around the 1200 mile mark. The other thing I notice is there's more pep to the engine. Pushing down on the gas pedal seems to be met with a smoother engine response and the acceleration doesn't seem to lag. It's quite an improvement on regular 87 octane gasoline.

 

If you're wondering about 'top tier' gasoline, there's plenty of information found with a basic internet search. There's a few brands offering gasoline that qualifies as 'top tier'.

 

Lastly, this may be purely coincidental about using a fuel with more detergent and experiencing declining vibrations to the point it has disappeared. I'll keep using Costco gasoline and if those happily forgotten vibrations and shakes return, an update will be made. I lost count on the number of tanks of fuel consumed but it's a big number of refills.

Posted

I find it interesting the GM throws rear ends, drive shafts, and wheels and tires at the issue but it does not seem that the actual rear rotors have been replaced. Considering the wheels mount directly to the face of the rotors it seems that it's plausible that the rotors could be manufactured with just enough variance to cause a vibration.

 

Have to seriously wonder how many resources are being devoted to fixing the issue.

Posted (edited)

My truck had the shaking/vibration problem. In this huge post, there's been a few theories about the cause of these vibrations and it seems the fixes haven't worked well for all. So I decided to skip over the idea of bringing my truck into the dealership for the part swapping expedition and decided to live with the condition.

 

If you read carefully, I used the past tense describe the vibration issue. For the past month, I've been using gasoline from a 'top-tier' station (Costco). Initially, there was slightly lesser periods of vibration and the amplitudes were definitely on a smaller scale. For the past two weeks, I drove my truck as my daily driver to see if the vibrations would continue to lessen. Each fill up was at Costco. My daily commute is about 170 miles. Today, my entire trip was vibration free, a first. It was a gradual process but this is my theory: the 5.3L engine must suffer with carbon deposits on the surfaces of the valves (and other components) and using gasoline without the higher levels of detergents found in the top tier gasoline more than likely assists with gunk forming on the valves (and other components). I have just over 5400 miles on my truck and the first vibrations became noticeable around the 1200 mile mark. The other thing I notice is there's more pep to the engine. Pushing down on the gas pedal seems to be met with a smoother engine response and the acceleration doesn't seem to lag. It's quite an improvement on regular 87 octane gasoline.

 

If you're wondering about 'top tier' gasoline, there's plenty of information found with a basic internet search. There's a few brands offering gasoline that qualifies as 'top tier'.

 

Lastly, this may be purely coincidental about using a fuel with more detergent and experiencing declining vibrations to the point it has disappeared. I'll keep using Costco gasoline and if those happily forgotten vibrations and shakes return, an update will be made. I lost count on the number of tanks of fuel consumed but it's a big number of refills.

The 5.3 and 6.2 are direct injection engines. Gas is not sprayed on the valves to clean them. The gas is injected between the bottom of the valve and the top of the piston. On the older engines the valves were washed with gas. Some people including me are using catch cans to try and keep the valves from coking. The valves can be cleaned using seafoam through the throttle body.

Edited by southern_sierra
Posted

My truck had the shaking/vibration problem. In this huge post, there's been a few theories about the cause of these vibrations and it seems the fixes haven't worked well for all. So I decided to skip over the idea of bringing my truck into the dealership for the part swapping expedition and decided to live with the condition.

 

If you read carefully, I used the past tense describe the vibration issue. For the past month, I've been using gasoline from a 'top-tier' station (Costco). Initially, there was slightly lesser periods of vibration and the amplitudes were definitely on a smaller scale. For the past two weeks, I drove my truck as my daily driver to see if the vibrations would continue to lessen. Each fill up was at Costco. My daily commute is about 170 miles. Today, my entire trip was vibration free, a first. It was a gradual process but this is my theory: the 5.3L engine must suffer with carbon deposits on the surfaces of the valves (and other components) and using gasoline without the higher levels of detergents found in the top tier gasoline more than likely assists with gunk forming on the valves (and other components). I have just over 5400 miles on my truck and the first vibrations became noticeable around the 1200 mile mark. The other thing I notice is there's more pep to the engine. Pushing down on the gas pedal seems to be met with a smoother engine response and the acceleration doesn't seem to lag. It's quite an improvement on regular 87 octane gasoline.

 

If you're wondering about 'top tier' gasoline, there's plenty of information found with a basic internet search. There's a few brands offering gasoline that qualifies as 'top tier'.

 

Lastly, this may be purely coincidental about using a fuel with more detergent and experiencing declining vibrations to the point it has disappeared. I'll keep using Costco gasoline and if those happily forgotten vibrations and shakes return, an update will be made. I lost count on the number of tanks of fuel consumed but it's a big number of refills.

Sorry buddy, that has nothing to do with the Vibrations talked about in this thread. Your vibe problems sound similar to mine in that they come and go.

Posted

Firing order is different on the new 5.3's? Any connection to someone's vibs?

Posted

I figured I would pile on with my story regarding the vibration with my Silverado. I have a 2015 Silverado LT with 18" Wheels. The vibration in my vehicle was noticed about a month and a half after purchase, mainly because it wasn't until after that time that I was regularly driving at freeway speeds. Like many of the other accounts posted on here, my vibration starts mainly in the steering wheel at about 45mph, then seems to die off until you hit 70mph. At 70 the vibration steadily gets worse becoming noticeable in the steering and pedals around 75mph and basically shaking the entire truck at 80.

 

I took the truck to the dealership close to where I work they replaced two tires and balanced the other two. Of course this didn't fix the problem. Took it back a week later, another two tires, balanced the other new tires again, no change. Took it in a few weeks later, PICO meter says it's balancing, they re-balanced all 4, still no change. The dealership said they were going to try to see if they could get GM to approve a non-standard repair for the issue. The dealership wanted to remove the Goodyear Wrangler tires on the truck and replace them with Michelin, GM approved, the caveat was, they wanted me to pay the difference in cost of the tires (um, no). I didn't approve since everyone involved has verified that the vibration exists, the truck only had 2300 miles when it went in for it's first repair, so it's a warranty issue. If they though a different brand of tires would fix it, they should be paying for them. Of course, I've driven a Sierra and a F-150 with the same tires on them, and the issue didn't exist.

 

Now, under Georgia's Lemon Law, they have three attempts and then you send them a letter requesting a final repair attempt. Sent the letter and received a call from Chevy's Customer Resolution Center. The scheduled the final repair attempt for yesterday (2/22/16) and said a GM Engineer would be onsite to resolve the issue. Left the vehicle there the whole day, and when I went to pick it up I was told that the balancing machine they were using was 1/1000th of an inch off and took the tires to another dealer with a brand new machine to re-balance the tires. They said some issues were found on that machine and corrected. They also did the PICO meter again and tried to tell me the vibration I was feeling was due to the soft tonneau cover I had on the truck buffeting in the wind (really?). So in order to humor the engineer, I drove it home with the cover rolled up, anyone want to guess the result, yep, vibration still there.

 

So under Georgia's Lemon Law, I am mailing the request for repurchase today to Chevrolet and I guess we will see what happens.

 

Sad part is, I still love GM Trucks, and should they agree to the repurchase without too much hassle, I plan to buy another one (granted the test drive may be more involved this time around). But with 544 pages to date of people discussing this issue, there has to be an underlying cause that needs to be addressed. But you can bet that if I end up having go to to the State run mediation, I'm going to print out all 544+ pages to take them will me to the hearing. I only feel bad for whoever gets this truck next since they won't have the benefit of the Lemon Law on their side.

 

I'll update as this progresses.

 

-Dennis

Posted

For those trying to track the vibration on your own, have you lifted the rear wheels off the ground and put the truck in "Drive" and checked how the wheels look while spinning? Mine appeared to be bent while spinning on the truck but the tire shop and dealership both confirmed the wheels are straight as an arrow with road force numbers under 10. This is what leads me to believe it's the rear rotors may be the issue. If straight wheels spin perfectly on a balancer and not perfectly on the the vehicle when the rear is in the air that leads me to believe the problem must be the surface the wheels mount to (the rotor). The rotor may be mounted improperly or there is a minimal defect in the manufacturing process, only time will tell. I want to get my truck back so I can run it with out the rear wheels and actually see if this is infact happening.

Posted

Also, if you do put in in "Drive" while in the air, don't be stupid. Please take all precautions such as using jack stands, block the front wheels, don't do it in a closed garage... You get the the picture. I don't want to read about someone who got ran over or killed by their own truck.

Also, if you do put in in "Drive" while in the air, don't be stupid. Please take all precautions such as using jack stands, block the front wheels, don't do it in a closed garage... You get the the picture. I don't want to read about someone who got ran over or killed by their own truck.

Posted

That might be a bent axle tube. You should feel it when braking if it's the rotor correct?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The fix is this: You order a new 2017 model and cross your fingers that it will not vibrate, or at least not too much. :rolleyes:

so suffer another year, and hope you still have enough time left to file for it.

 

I find it interesting the GM throws rear ends, drive shafts, and wheels and tires at the issue but it does not seem that the actual rear rotors have been replaced. Considering the wheels mount directly to the face of the rotors it seems that it's plausible that the rotors could be manufactured with just enough variance to cause a vibration.

Im sure someone out there has aftermarket rotors by now..... I tend to doubt that they are the issue. I believe it was abominable that took is rear end apart and found the edges of the gear teeth chipping away... GM said don't worry about it lol.

 

My truck had the shaking/vibration problem. In this huge post, there's been a few theories about the cause of these vibrations and it seems the fixes haven't worked well for all. So I decided to skip over the idea of bringing my truck into the dealership for the part swapping expedition and decided to live with the condition.

 

If you read carefully, I used the past tense describe the vibration issue. For the past month, I've been using gasoline from a 'top-tier' station (Costco). Initially, there was slightly lesser periods of vibration and the amplitudes were definitely on a smaller scale. For the past two weeks, I drove my truck as my daily driver to see if the vibrations would continue to lessen. Each fill up was at Costco. My daily commute is about 170 miles. Today, my entire trip was vibration free, a first. It was a gradual process but this is my theory: the 5.3L engine must suffer with carbon deposits on the surfaces of the valves (and other components) and using gasoline without the higher levels of detergents found in the top tier gasoline more than likely assists with gunk forming on the valves (and other components). I have just over 5400 miles on my truck and the first vibrations became noticeable around the 1200 mile mark. The other thing I notice is there's more pep to the engine. Pushing down on the gas pedal seems to be met with a smoother engine response and the acceleration doesn't seem to lag. It's quite an improvement on regular 87 octane gasoline.

 

If you're wondering about 'top tier' gasoline, there's plenty of information found with a basic internet search. There's a few brands offering gasoline that qualifies as 'top tier'.

 

Lastly, this may be purely coincidental about using a fuel with more detergent and experiencing declining vibrations to the point it has disappeared. I'll keep using Costco gasoline and if those happily forgotten vibrations and shakes return, an update will be made. I lost count on the number of tanks of fuel consumed but it's a big number of refills.

Gas has nothing to do with it, for that matter I only use "top tier" fuels in shell, mobile, and sunoco. doesn't help me

 

For those trying to track the vibration on your own, have you lifted the rear wheels off the ground and put the truck in "Drive" and checked how the wheels look while spinning? Mine appeared to be bent while spinning on the truck but the tire shop and dealership both confirmed the wheels are straight as an arrow with road force numbers under 10. This is what leads me to believe it's the rear rotors may be the issue. If straight wheels spin perfectly on a balancer and not perfectly on the the vehicle when the rear is in the air that leads me to believe the problem must be the surface the wheels mount to (the rotor). The rotor may be mounted improperly or there is a minimal defect in the manufacturing process, only time will tell. I want to get my truck back so I can run it with out the rear wheels and actually see if this is infact happening.

 

 

That might be a bent axle tube. You should feel it when braking if it's the rotor correct?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This i agree with

 

 

I know people have used lift and leveling kits, but has anyone tried using a softer shock, and adding sway bars to reduce the additional body roll that would likely result. leaf spring clamps have helped some people.

 

just spit balling here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...