Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm sorry, but that statement is just flat wrong. While GM does give huge rebates, which I will agree does lower the trade value in the end, the offers that competitive dealers are offering BECAUSE OF THIS VIBRATION are insanely low. I've even had dealers admit that the Vibration Problem is hurting the value. The premise that that our values would be this low to begin with it utter bull sh*t.

 

You can see my previous posts about the value where I cite what KBB, NADA, Autotrader etc. say they are worth without my accessories vs. what I've been getting offered.

 

I agree. I traded my 2014 Silverado on a Ram eight months ago. I've dealt with this particular Dodge/Ram dealer several times before and always received KBB or a bit higher for my trades. With the SIlverado however, I got several grand below KBB and the truck was in excellent shape as are all my vehicles. While mine only had a minor vibration problem, it had too many other unfixable problems. I happened to be at the dealership yesterday for service and wandered around their lot. I couldn't help but notice lots of late model Silverado's in their used car section. I don't buy the 1-3% fantasy for a second. Back in 2011 Dodge Challengers with the 5.7 auto were having timing chain failures. Their best Forum had a similar thread as this. They had a running total of all the affected Challengers with year, date and mileage of failure. When Chrysler finally identified the source of the problem, a plastic chain guide that cracked due to the added stress of their cylinder deactivation system on the auto trans cars, the thread had about 55 affected cars. Now you might say that's a tiny percentage of all the Challengers produced as some fanboys did. But when you think about the fact that it was 55 cars that were 2009-2012 R/T trim only with the auto trans only from a group of owners who were also members of a specific Forum who actually read that thread and who also decided to post their experience, then you see it's 55 failures from a tiny, tiny number of owners. I did a rough calculation based on the number of 2008-2012 Challenger R/T auto trans produced vs the approximate number of Forum member's who owned 2008-2012 Challenger R/T auto trans and came up with about 15% failures so far at that point. So I suspect there's a similar figure here. Now as to my 2015 Ram. I've had a recall on the left axle housing and I was just in for a power window switch replacement. That's two dealership trips in eight months. More than I wanted but still that is 1/4 of the dealership trips I made in the same time frame when I had my Silverado.

Edited by mjb4450
  • Like 1
Posted

What do you think GM would give to the customer who comes up with fixes that reduce or eliminate some of the vibration issues? Rent/Checkout their pico scope and produce significant before and after readings. Those lower vibration readings have a value when they are putting in an expressway for buybacks.

Posted

What do you think GM would give to the customer who comes up with fixes that reduce or eliminate some of the vibration issues? Rent/Checkout their pico scope and produce significant before and after readings. Those lower vibration readings have a value when they are putting in an expressway for buybacks.

I'll bet they'll give nothing since first they would have to admit there is a problem and second they'd have to admit their engineers couldn't find a fix or that corporate just didn't care to look for a fix.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'll bet they'll give nothing since first they would have to admit there is a problem and second they'd have to admit their engineers couldn't find a fix or that corporate just didn't care to look for a fix.

It would be even worse if some type of appreciation wasn't given to someone who reduces their claims and allows for the increase of customer satisfaction. What if someone is so mad at them for how things are handled and sits on fix that would reduce the scope of a recall, just to allow another year or two of production and then bring things to light.

 

I would certainly help GM out if they let me swap keys for any Silverado model? A two year upgrade for free.

Posted (edited)

"As mentioned dozens of times already, those of us with vibe problems (including myself) account for maybe 1 to 3 % of the 2014+ trucks out there. "

 

 

The only one who keeps mentioning that is YOU.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Edited by C6Bill
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I've got a novel idea, Howz about all you jagoffs that traded your GM product for a Jap or Mopar truck go troll somewhere else. There must be multiple web sites where you can beat your chest and spout your rhetoric about how bad the GM trucks are and how good the Jap and or Mopar and of Ford trucks are. Quit trolling! I had two 2015's and now a 2016 and they all were, and still are, fantastic!

Edited by steelcity
Posted

"As mentioned dozens of times already, those of us with vibe problems (including myself) account for maybe 1 to 3 % of the 2014+ trucks out there. "

 

 

The only one who keeps mentioning that is YOU.

I am not the only one who knows/says it and I am one who has vibration troubles. Sorry it hurts your feelings so much, guess having to go through the trade in process and losing money has left some open wounds. It must just be the trucks in the SE that do not have much vibration trouble because I have not found another person in the over 100 I have asked who has vibration problems besides myself. I have also bought 4 new vehicles in the last 4 years and I have not come across one dealer who is wanting to give blue book for a trade in if you are able to negotiate a low enough price on the new vehicle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Posted

I have no hurt feelings. You keep stating your feelings as a fact. I am not the only one who disagrees with your findings. And we would all like to know where you have found the statistics you keep putting out as fact. Did I lose money ? Absolutely, but do I care about that ? No I do not, that is why I dumped the Silverado's and moved to a different brand. I also moved on from my Corvette. I don't think GM deserves my business.

  • Like 1
Posted

It would be even worse if some type of appreciation wasn't given to someone who reduces their claims and allows for the increase of customer satisfaction. What if someone is so mad at them for how things are handled and sits on fix that would reduce the scope of a recall, just to allow another year or two of production and then bring things to light.

 

I would certainly help GM out if they let me swap keys for any Silverado model? A two year upgrade for free.

Are you hinting that you found the fix? lol

 

I've got a novel idea, Howz about all you jagoffs that traded your GM product for a Jap or Mopar truck go troll somewhere else. There must be multiple web sites where you can beat your chest and spout your rhetoric about how bad the GM trucks are and how good the Jap and or Mopar and of Ford trucks are. Quit trolling! I had two 2015's and now a 2016 and they all were, and still are, fantastic!

Thats very uncalled for, these "Trolls" started with GM, they are not fan boys of the other brands. They suffered and have every right to be here, the real Trolls are the ones who come in never having had GM or the problems.

 

I paid the cover charge so I'm staying.

I got your back Bill

Posted

I'm new to this forum...on many others though.

 

Got this in response to a question I asked my dealer and it came from the Product Mgr for the Silverado/Sierra @ GM:

 

 

Since we launched this current generation of PU in 14MY we have had a mix of AL or cast iron front control arms. It is based on the total mass of the truck and has varied as to which models have received AL based on the need to control mass to keep trucks in specific test weight groups. The 16MY started this same way, but is changing very soon (in the next month or so) to 100% stamped steel control arms. The mass will be between the AL and cast iron versions. Please note a key driver for this change is an improvement in reducing the truck’s sensitivity to vibration inputs from wheels/tires.
FYI.... have a 2016 Sierra All Terrain 6.2L - with steel control arms, have had no vibrations pre/post level. Truck was lowered in the rear to level with shackles and removing the blocks.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I've got a novel idea, Howz about all you jagoffs that traded your GM product for a Jap or Mopar truck go troll somewhere else. There must be multiple web sites where you can beat your chest and spout your rhetoric about how bad the GM trucks are and how good the Jap and or Mopar and of Ford trucks are. Quit trolling! I had two 2015's and now a 2016 and they all were, and still are, fantastic!

Sorry, I'm not going anywhere. This soap opera has become too addicting. Will Mr Smith be told it's functioning as designed? Will they change yet more tires leading to the question is it insanity to do the same thing over and over expecting different results? Will Marsha marry Biff? Stay tuned to the next episode of "As The GM Vibrates". BTW, what is your job title at GM?

Edited by mjb4450
Posted (edited)

"As mentioned dozens of times already, those of us with vibe problems (including myself) account for maybe 1 to 3 % of the 2014+ trucks out there. "

 

Hmmm was just thinking 1-3% of the 1.9 million trucks is like 19000-57000.

Edited by oneandzero
  • Like 1
Posted

 

I'm new to this forum...on many others though.

 

Got this in response to a question I asked my dealer and it came from the Product Mgr for the Silverado/Sierra @ GM:

 

 

Since we launched this current generation of PU in 14MY we have had a mix of AL or cast iron front control arms. It is based on the total mass of the truck and has varied as to which models have received AL based on the need to control mass to keep trucks in specific test weight groups. The 16MY started this same way, but is changing very soon (in the next month or so) to 100% stamped steel control arms. The mass will be between the AL and cast iron versions. Please note a key driver for this change is an improvement in reducing the truck’s sensitivity to vibration inputs from wheels/tires.
FYI.... have a 2016 Sierra All Terrain 6.2L - with steel control arms, have had no vibrations pre/post level. Truck was lowered in the rear to level with shackles and removing the blocks.

 

Is there a way to specifically get one with the stamped steel that you are aware of?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...