Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Danyoda said:

Not sure if this is the right place to post, but I have a 2018 GMC Sierra All Terrain. I want to get a level completely on the truck and remove the rake. I also want to fit some 33.5’s-34’s by 11-11.5 wide tires and still keep good or better ride quality. I’m thinking of keeping my stock 20’s or possibly later get some Method 17’s. What are some good options for a daily driver such as myself. Not looking to rock crawl. Can I just put some Bilstein 5100’s in the front and remove the rear block? Any help would be appreciated. If this has been answered before I apologize but 250 pages is a lot to look at! Thank you!

64A745F8-8098-4E13-9F34-B78F68CA6990.jpeg

This is just my opinion but if you go larger than 285/55/20 or 275/60/20 you may have some rubbing issues with stock wheels or need to use a .25 inch spacer to keep from rubbing.  What I did was install the Bilstein 5100 struts in front with a spacer to level the front, and some 5100s in back.  Truck sits close to level and ride quality is much better with the Bilsteins as compared to the OEM Ranchos that came as part of the Z71 package.  Ride is much more controlled and not as mushy, in my opinion.  And the 275/60/20 BFG All Terrain T/A KO2s are not noisy and my MPG has not changed much from when it was stock.  Plus I can still get into all the parking garages in Houston.  

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, jimbrown1 said:

This is just my opinion but if you go larger than 285/55/20 or 275/60/20 you may have some rubbing issues with stock wheels or need to use a .25 inch spacer to keep from rubbing.  What I did was install the Bilstein 5100 struts in front with a spacer to level the front, and some 5100s in back.  Truck sits close to level and ride quality is much better with the Bilsteins as compared to the OEM Ranchos that came as part of the Z71 package.  Ride is much more controlled and not as mushy, in my opinion.  And the 275/60/20 BFG All Terrain T/A KO2s are not noisy and my MPG has not changed much from when it was stock.  Plus I can still get into all the parking garages in Houston.  

Which setting did you set the Bilsteins? And how big of a spacer did you get for the strut? My concern is for the angles as well I don’t want to mess with the ball joints. If I don’t need to purchase new upper a arms I rather not. And my thought as well was to go get some BFG’s. Do you have a pic of your set up? 
 

Would removing the rear block be a good idea? 
 

Thank you for the info! 

Posted
1 minute ago, Danyoda said:

Which setting did you set the Bilsteins? And how big of a spacer did you get for the strut? My concern is for the angles as well I don’t want to mess with the ball joints. If I don’t need to purchase new upper a arms I rather not. And my thought as well was to go get some BFG’s. Do you have a pic of your set up? 
 

Would removing the rear block be a good idea? 
 

Thank you for the info! 

I left the Bilstein struts on the lowest/stock setting and installed a Rugged Off Road spacer to bring it up 1.85"-2" in the front.  My angles are fine with this setup and I kept the stock UCAs.

 

https://www.ruggedoffroad.com/product-page/2007-2017-chevy-silverado-gmc-sierra-1500-6-lug-2-0-leveling-kit

 

 

Sierra with level kit and BF Goodrich tires.jpg

Posted
1 minute ago, Danyoda said:

Do you think going 2.5 would be too much? 

It is my opinion that 1.75-2" is plenty and 2.5" would be too much.  Others on here may disagree but I would be concerned with the angles if going 2.5".  Just my opinion as I have never leveled my trucks more than 2".  I did install a 3.5" kit on my 2011 Silverado and used .25" spacers for the stock wheels but it still rubbed a little and the other components adjusted my angles appropriately.  

Posted
26 minutes ago, bndawgs said:

Is anyone running 275/60/20 BFGs All Terrains on their stock setup? 

I am, I think it looks great! No rubbing or clearance issues, been on the truck for 12k+ miles, completely stock. I load up with ATVs and firewood regularly and have no problems, you will notice the weight though... I lost a solid 3mpgs with the 20s and BFG KO2s.604.thumb.JPG.c92d37725944496266f5e7806182ec98.JPG

Posted
2 hours ago, cheyenne383 said:

I am, I think it looks great! No rubbing or clearance issues, been on the truck for 12k+ miles, completely stock. I load up with ATVs and firewood regularly and have no problems, you will notice the weight though... I lost a solid 3mpgs with the 20s and BFG KO2s.604.thumb.JPG.c92d37725944496266f5e7806182ec98.JPG

That does look good.  I'm debating between the BFGs and Michelin Ltx.  I can't wait to get rid of these SRAs. 

Posted
That does look good.  I'm debating between the BFGs and Michelin Ltx.  I can't wait to get rid of these SRAs. 
Look at the Falken Wildpeak at3. They are also a good option and look very nice on our trucks

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Ladies and Gents, 

Wanted to give a big shout out to everyone who contributes to these forums as well as thank you for those who posted there mods and set ups. A ton of my questions regarding my truck were solved right here as well as helped me decide on my suspension route! Hopefully my contribution will assist another curious soul like myself as to what they can run for performance, clearance, looks and minimal costs!

 

2017 Z71 5.3 with STAMPED control arms.

- Swapped my rough country level blocks (2'" level) for a 4 pack of Bilstein 5100s. achieved 1.8" of level in the front and retained the same height in the back so a slight level with some rake.

 

- Swapped my stock 275/55/20 Goodyear SR-A and rims which equates to a 31.9"  tall and 10.9" wide tire for a set of Nitto Ridge Grapplers in 33/12.50/18's and Fuel Assaults 18x9 -12 offset, putting me barely an inch outside the wheel well

 

- To begin with, I trimmed the felt liner maybe 2-3"s and slightly bolted it back to remove ANY rub, as well as slightly trimmed the front of the air dam to ensure zero rub, which was achieved successfully!! I have excellent clearance at all angles, zero rub on any components including my dreaded UCA problem even while running through my deer hunting field. 

 

- The Bilsteins and NIttos feel BadA$$ for lack of better terms, much much more smoother than my Ranchos and I feel the 12.50s gripping much better than my 10.9s. Not to the point where it feels laggy or bogged down but much more comfortable and smooth. The shocks are night and day, seriously! As far as acceleration goes, I noticed zero difference when I stomped it to hop on the freeway, as well as saw minimal loss in MPGs. These are all concerns that I had when deciding with a bigger tire set up. 

 

- For those who want to run a nice big mean tire with a slightly aggressive offset and look, this is an ideal set up for cost and performance with minimal trimming and mods. I'm sure I missed  something here so please feel free to ask questions or request any pictures of mods or gear and thanks again guys for contributing and answering the questions I had!

IMG_1598.jpg

IMG_1609.jpg

IMG_1610.jpg

IMG_1611.jpg

Posted
On 12/27/2019 at 10:55 PM, bndawgs said:

That does look good.  I'm debating between the BFGs and Michelin Ltx.  I can't wait to get rid of these SRAs. 

even those are both considered 'all terrain' tires...i would put them into two separate categories...and encourage you to consider what you want out of your tires...Michelin LTX are if not, close to the best highway wet pavement AT tire out there...i would say more of an all season than all terrain, but they didnt ask me to rate them...the are not very good at all in muddy situations and off road (i cant comment on how they do on ice and snow)...the BFGs are more of a true all terrain in that they can do really well off road as well as on road...

 

and then of course there is the visual factor...if looks are important, then get what you think looks best...

 

the reason for my post is those are really two different tires to be deciding between, i would prioritize what you want first...(performance, looks, off road, etc) and it would seemingly dictate which tire you should get...make sense?

Posted
15 minutes ago, spenpet said:

even those are both considered 'all terrain' tires...i would put them into two separate categories...and encourage you to consider what you want out of your tires...Michelin LTX are if not, close to the best highway wet pavement AT tire out there...i would say more of an all season than all terrain, but they didnt ask me to rate them...the are not very good at all in muddy situations and off road (i cant comment on how they do on ice and snow)...the BFGs are more of a true all terrain in that they can do really well off road as well as on road...

 

and then of course there is the visual factor...if looks are important, then get what you think looks best...

 

the reason for my post is those are really two different tires to be deciding between, i would prioritize what you want first...(performance, looks, off road, etc) and it would seemingly dictate which tire you should get...make sense?

Thanks for info.  I mainly do Hwy and pavement driving, but do occasionally find myself driving through construction sites and getting all muddy. :D. Wet traction and handling in the snow are also important.   I have always liked Michelins and Costco is running their Michelin promo this month, which has me leaning towards the LTX.  But the BFGs really do look good on our trucks.  

Posted
On 12/26/2019 at 9:44 PM, manderson7015 said:

Not necessary but when i go 1" higher in the summer i will not have to change my uca's. I was proactive when i did this. Still liking my set up.

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
 

Loving it.  Although I think I will lift the rears an inch.  May do it by adding a helper leaf spring as I've had good luck with that in the past.

 

Thanks again for the info.

Posted
5 hours ago, TX_MattyIce said:

I just put a 2.5 in leveling kit on my 2015. Do y’all think I’ll have to trim to try and fit 285/75/17 with methods? 

I’ve got 285/65/18’s +18 on bilsteins with 1.5” spacers, I think that equates to around -12 with the spacers or so. Mine just rub a touch when in reverse at full lock. And that’s with 1.75” of lift. I think you’ll be good

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...