Jump to content

Have u had an Electronic Vibration Analysis done to ur 2014?


Recommended Posts

Posted

If your 2014 Sierra/Silverado has a vibration/shake, has a dealer used an EVA, Electronic Vibration Analyzer on your truck?

 

If so, what was the reading?

 

Did they give you any numbers and/or explain them to you?

 

Were you present during the analysis? If so, where did they mount or put the analyzer? How long did it take?

 

Did the analysis help or hurt your case about the shake/vibe?

 

Thanks for any info.

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

If your 2014 Sierra/Silverado has a vibration/shake, has a dealer used an EVA, Electronic Vibration Analyzer on your truck?

 

If so, what was the reading?

 

Did they give you any numbers and/or explain them to you?

 

Were you present during the analysis? If so, where did they mount or put the analyzer? How long did it take?

 

Did the analysis help or hurt your case about the shake/vibe?

 

Thanks for any info.

 

Taking mine in tomorrow to have the analysis done. Will report back with findings, but will be sure to ask a lot of these questions.

Posted

Had mine done due to 40 to 50 mph vibration. Don't recall the numbers, but they confirmed the observation. Upon receipt, GM ordered rear gear measurements that confirmed the need for rear axle replacement. After that was done, the vibration disappeared.

 

I found the complete details in the work order very interesting. Would be a big job to re-type it all into this forum, but if folks want I would do it when I have some time.

Posted

Had mine done due to 40 to 50 mph vibration. Don't recall the numbers, but they confirmed the observation. Upon receipt, GM ordered rear gear measurements that confirmed the need for rear axle replacement. After that was done, the vibration disappeared.

 

I found the complete details in the work order very interesting. Would be a big job to re-type it all into this forum, but if folks want I would do it when I have some time.

 

I'd hate to see you waste your time re-typing the details of the job, but may ask you for some high-level details based on what the dealer finds out with my truck tomorrow. From what I have read, it looks like you are the only person who actually had the vibrations eliminated. Hope I can say the same thing here in the next few days/weeks here.

Posted

Had mine done due to 40 to 50 mph vibration. Don't recall the numbers, but they confirmed the observation. Upon receipt, GM ordered rear gear measurements that confirmed the need for rear axle replacement. After that was done, the vibration disappeared.

 

I found the complete details in the work order very interesting. Would be a big job to re-type it all into this forum, but if folks want I would do it when I have some time.

To save you from typing, would you mind just taking a picture of the work order and posting it here for all to see. I'm going to the dealer tomorrow and this would be great ammunition for myself. Please help us out.

Posted

Im looking at having the EVA done next week. They just told me that a tech would ride along with me and I needed to demonstrate the vibe. Any details from someone that has been through it would be helpful.

Posted

Skylineflyer - Your request exceeds my limited abilities! The resident expert had her knee replaced y-day, so is very unavailable (too much info!).

I have the photos in the confuser, but don't know how to attach! I know how to send to an email address, but.....

Posted

Im looking at having the EVA done next week. They just told me that a tech would ride along with me and I needed to demonstrate the vibe. Any details from someone that has been through it would be helpful.

My vibration was only between 40 and 50 mph, so may not apply. First drive (with mechanic behind the wheel) he noticed it immediately, tried shifting into neutral, increasing and decreasing speed, etc. Within days they rebalanced, road-force balanced, rotated tires, etc. No change. GM OK'd EVA which confirmed. My 2 page work order details what followed.

Posted

EVA results - (hooked to drivers seat track at 44 mph) "6HZ .03Gs. (hooked to vertical multifunction switch screw inside steering column) "28HZ .10Gs At that point dealer contacted T.A.C. Driveline and was given bad instructions for measuring the rear diff. After completing the measurements he was told (correctly) to "take backlash readings tooth to tooth on all of the ring gear teeth looking for a variance of no more than .0001 tooth to tooth and no more than .0002 total variance. First tooth reading was .0005, teeth 10,11 were .0006, tooth 20 .0005, 21 .0007, 22 .0006 (etc., etc)" ending with "the remaining 7 teeth were in specs)" "There were two areas where the backlash was out of specs."

 

T.A.C. then told them to "order a complete rear diff for a 2015 sierra." The rest is just a recap of the removal and replacement process plus the T.A.C. case #

 

 

Hope this helps anyone with a 40 to 50 mph vibration and an uncooperative dealer. This, at least, can be fixed.

Posted

Very interesting. What gear ratio?

It's the 3.42.

Posted

Pmurray what is your build date?

 

There is no relevance in build date, they vibrate from the earliest ones made in May of 2013 all the way to the ones being put on the lot today. Granted there are a much higher number of vibe free trucks than there are ones with issues, but it is not limited to build date as stated before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...