Jump to content

New 2015 Silverado Custom - The right truck for you?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Silverado custom 15.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
2/12/2015

Answer these quick questions to see if you might be interested in the new Chevy Silverado Custom trim level about to be introduced at the Chicago Auto Show. Do you:

  • Expect to keep your trucks for a long time.
  • Want a truck that is as dependable as you are.
  • Prefer a stylish exterior and a clean, functional interior.
  • Want a vehicle that will be easy to maintain and inexpensive to repair.

Chevy says these are the things its designers had in mind when they configured the new Silverado Custom. Chevy started with the double-cab Silverado LS. Then Chevy added the following to features to that base truck:

20-inch aluminum wheels - chrome bumpers - body-colored top cap above the front bumper - chrome mirror caps and door handles.

 

The Custom has a lot of other standard features starting with full doors and Chevy MyLink with 4G LTE WiFi.

Silverado custom graphic.jpg

Sandor Piszar, marketing director for Chevy Trucks explained that although the high-end of the Chevy truck line is selling very well, “... there are also millions of customers in the heart of the market who want a great looking, well-equipped truck at an affordable price."

 

Chevy plans to price the new Silverado Custom 2WD with the 5.3-liter V8 at about $34,000. A 4WD version will start at about $38,000. Expect trucks to begin arriving at dealers in early spring.

Silverado custom graphic.jpg

Silverado custom 15.jpg

Silverado custom graphic.jpg

Silverado custom 15.jpg

Silverado custom graphic.jpg

Silverado custom 15.jpg

Posted

I wonder why they haven't shown any details on the C/K 10 package for the LS trim (what was 2WT).

 

NEW! C/K 10, includes (RHO) 20" x 9" silver painted aluminum wheels, (QSS) P275/55R20 all-season, blackwall tires, (E20) chrome door handles and (DP9) chrome mirror caps

 

 

EDIT: It appears GM is just retarded when it comes to naming. This is the C/K10 package but they are calling it "Custom." Odd considering there is Custom Sport Truck and now this. I feel like they were aiming for a "Custom Deluxe" style revival.

Posted

So it's the same LT all star edition like my 2014 for the same price? Got it.

No no no. It's a "Custom" truck now.

 

The sad part of that is the description. You now have to buy a "Custom" truck to get these qualities?

  • Expect to keep your trucks for a long time.
  • Want a truck that is as dependable as you are.
  • Prefer a stylish exterior and a clean, functional interior.
  • Want a vehicle that will be easy to maintain and inexpensive to repair.

Kind of raises the question, what do you get with any other model?

Posted

 

"I guess I'll stick with my '94 that's been paid off for 17 years now."

 

 

That's the way I felt about my '97 Silverado, until it was totaled last May by a lady in an F-150.

Posted

Nothing to jump at for sure...I will keep mine...

 

2010 GMC 2x4 LMG 5.3 6 spd auto Reg Cab WT with 17x9 MT Classic Black

 

Looking at Edelbrocks Supercharger as THE upgrade...

Anyone else done the build?

 

Built a 2004 Reg cab LQ9 added 6 speed hurst shifted giddy up!

Posted

Given GM's track record on reliablility the past 20 years, I'll wait and see on these claims ....

 

$34 - $38k is "affordable" ?? Affordable to me is $1k .... so they were close. :crackup:

Posted

To me it looks like a re-named All-Star Edition. Personally, I like the name "All-Star Edition" better.

 

GM has always done this. Slap some stickers on a certain model and call it a special edition: Marketing.

 

It will attract some buyers for sure.

 

But, just like the All-Star, after several months, Chevy will run a promotion featuring huge discounts on the "Custom Edition". I think the last All-Star discount was something like $7,500. So it would be worth the wait IMO.

Posted

 

  • Expect to keep your trucks for a long time.

 

 

Complete crud. GM Dealers will not schedule or work on trucks older than 10 years. Some will, but most are sticking to this "rule". I had to open a complaint case with GM HQ to find a dealer to fix my A/C on a 1995 Yukon a few years ago when I was in the lower 48. Three service managers actually argued with GM that they wouldn't look at it. Actually kept us from buying a new car from the same netowrk of that dealership. "Like a rock, keep your trucks for a long time, longest lasting trucks on the road"...but we won't fix them.

 

Like said earlier, those four characteristics are what I want in EVERY vehicle.

Posted

GM Dealers will not schedule or work on trucks older than 10 years.

My '94 has never been back to a dealer since I bought it new off the lot. 220K miles and runs like a champ. I've had some repairs but nothing too expensive - water pump, fuel pump, alternator, muffler, catalytic converter, etc.

 

Normal scheduled tune ups, oil changes, and filter replacements plus a transmission flush every 70K miles.

Posted

 

 

Complete crud. GM Dealers will not schedule or work on trucks older than 10 years. Some will, but most are sticking to this "rule". I had to open a complaint case with GM HQ to find a dealer to fix my A/C on a 1995 Yukon a few years ago when I was in the lower 48. Three service managers actually argued with GM that they wouldn't look at it. Actually kept us from buying a new car from the same netowrk of that dealership. "Like a rock, keep your trucks for a long time, longest lasting trucks on the road"...but we won't fix them.

 

Like said earlier, those four characteristics are what I want in EVERY vehicle.

I had my 12 year old Silverado to a couple of dealers after 10 years. No problem at all getting it serviced.

I have receipts to prove it.

Posted

 

 

Complete crud. GM Dealers will not schedule or work on trucks older than 10 years. Some will, but most are sticking to this "rule". I had to open a complaint case with GM HQ to find a dealer to fix my A/C on a 1995 Yukon a few years ago when I was in the lower 48. Three service managers actually argued with GM that they wouldn't look at it. Actually kept us from buying a new car from the same netowrk of that dealership. "Like a rock, keep your trucks for a long time, longest lasting trucks on the road"...but we won't fix them.

 

Like said earlier, those four characteristics are what I want in EVERY vehicle.

 

Why should they work on them? The truck is 10 years old or better and why would you take a 10+ year old truck to the dealer to get it fixed, is that not what the family owned and operated auto repair shops are for?

Posted

 

Why should they work on them? The truck is 10 years old or better and why would you take a 10+ year old truck to the dealer to get it fixed, is that not what the family owned and operated auto repair shops are for?

My current dealer IS family owned. Why take it to the dealer? Jennings will fix it RIGHT and guarantee their work. Pricing is competitive too, and no knockoff parts.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...