Jump to content

Headlight Illumination Issues


deputy

Recommended Posts

Posted

Had the tsb done on my truck Saturday, now with the first time driving the truck in the dark, it seems to be no better, maybe worse-can that be?

 

Checked the driver's side bulb and it is the Vosla, where the original was a Phillips.

 

Is there a specific orientation of the bulb when installed-currently they have it where the plug end is up at the "1:00" location.

I had the same conversion done, same crappy lighting GM really needs to do something! Lighting is disgusting and unsafe!

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I can't see mine right now -- the truck is covered with snow! But the tabs and slots only line up one way, so if you remove it, and re-install it so it locks in tight, it will be the "right" way. Someone who can get to theirs right now can say if that is, or isn't, at the 1 o'clock position.

 

There have been reports on the thread of people having the bulb re-installed only part way into the hole, which causes the projector to aim the light incorrectly, scattering the focus.

 

I agree the Vosla bulb isn't great. It should be marginally better than the old bulb, but its nothing spectacular.

Posted

Here's 3 pictures and instructions I did up for you guys.

 

First, turn the bulb counterclockwise as if you would be removing it until all 3 black plastic tabs on the bulb are showing and the bulb is loose. Illustration #1

Turn bulb clockwise until it stops and be sure all 3 black tabs are under the metal spring clips. Be sure the bulb is turned clockwise until it stops at 1:00. #2

Illustration #3 shows an improper seated bulb as the black plastic bulb tab is over the spring clip and not under it. Check all 3 plastic tabs to be sure they are under the spring clips.

 

Hope this helps! Chris

 

post-91158-0-05621500-1438822290.jpg

post-91158-0-87929700-1438822320.jpg

post-91158-0-55525500-1438822343.jpg

post-91158-0-05621500-1438822290_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-87929700-1438822320_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-55525500-1438822343_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-05621500-1438822290_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-87929700-1438822320_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-55525500-1438822343_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-05621500-1438822290_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-87929700-1438822320_thumb.jpg

post-91158-0-55525500-1438822343_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thanks to this forum I told my dealer about the headlight TSB, They hadn't heard of it. Got it done today and I don't know if it's just placebo effect or what but to me it seems WAY better!

Posted

Looks like the headlight lawsuit is working its way through the system:

 

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9622938/Becerra_et_al_v_General_Motors_LLC_et_al

 

It'll be reviewed and dismissed once GM produces the Federal requirements for lighting which probably does not mention anything about the non-existant side lighting spill-over which is my main complaint. If the judge is interested, he'll want evidence that the lighting is not following the Fed's requirements.

Posted

I agree the Vosla bulb isn't great. It should be marginally better than the old bulb, but its nothing spectacular.

 

it is at first but over time it yellows out more and more.

Posted

 

It'll be reviewed and dismissed once GM produces the Federal requirements for lighting which probably does not mention anything about the non-existant side lighting spill-over which is my main complaint. If the judge is interested, he'll want evidence that the lighting is not following the Fed's requirements.

IF Judge Q Hayes has any brains, he will request to drive the vehicle in question then if necessary direct the FED's change their requirements, Fat chance of that happening, GM may meet Federal guidelines, however it is their responsibility to insure their vehicle is safe in all ways. If the 2016 has improved design, the question is why?

Posted

... If the 2016 has improved design, the question is why?

 

 

Vehicles are always improving, that's why. Also, I'm assuming that GM is telling the truth when the instruction sheet that came with the new bulbs and installation procedure is following the FED requirements to the T.

 

I think the most the judge would do is to require a testing agency to certify the lighting follows the Fed requirements. I'll betcha that Fed standard is more ancient than I am. Changing the Fed requirements would be laughably difficult. It would take a modern day Ralph Nader (Unsafe at any Speed) to push the lawsuit into a Congressional hearing.

Posted

mafd2, thanks for the pictures of the bulb installed correctly/incorrectly.

 

Checked my driver-side bulb, was installed correctly, assuming the pass.-side is as well as the light pattern when shown on my garage door looks the same.

 

Still thinking something amiss if the Vosla upgrade should show an improvement.

Posted

I made a motion to dismiss as well.

I dismissed the truck.

 

The folks who haven taken this to the next level have more patience than me. My time is too valuable too and I have never bought a vehicle to test the warranty.

 

My next truck, when I get around to it, will be a used older model with VERY good lights even if I have to pay for them. :rolleyes:

Good luck.

 

 

 

Posted

Had a extremely close call last night with 6 deer that appeared "out of nowhere" from my left, luckily I was only going about 40-45mph and the roads were dry. I agree with others that say the stock lighting is downright dangerous!

 

After that incident I experimented the rest of the way home and found that the fog/driving lamps on these trucks is a must, and that the high beam mode is useless in my opinion, only additional lighting provided by the "high" mode is road signs are lit up, no better lighting elsewhere.

 

Since having the update done I've been in contact with my dealer, their suggestion so far is to either put the Phillips bulbs back in (which to me seemed somewhat better than the Vosla), or try the aftermarket.

 

They had a customer who went to a local truck accessory shop and had a Putco Nit-Lux LED kit in and this customer stated to them that he is extremely happy now. (I checked with the shop, they want @ $300 installed for the kit.)

 

While at the dealer, a salesperson was showing a customer a new '15 Sierra, felt tempted to walk over and tell him to drive the truck at night before purchasing.

Posted

Regretting that I didn't get any before & after pictures of the lighting to compare the Phillips vs. Vosla bulbs, since I already had the most current bcm update when truck was built 6/'15.

 

Has anyone been able to do a Phillips vs. Vosla comparison?

 

From the specs., bulbs seem to be very similar in performance.

Posted

They will have changed the phillips bulb from what they were using prior to the production changed the bcm programming. No reason to expect the current production philips to perform different than the volso they were using for the service upgrade.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...