Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

@ Big Wiskey

 

Just curious, are you getting 17" black rims in the spring?

 

I have the same truck in white, but I have the 245/75 17s on my truck right now. I have been looking at the tire size you chose, looks sooo much better with the bigger tires!!

Posted

@ Big Wiskey

 

Just curious, are you getting 17" black rims in the spring?

 

I have the same truck in white, but I have the 245/75 17s on my truck right now. I have been looking at the tire size you chose, looks sooo much better with the bigger tires!!

Yes, most likely. I kind of feel like I screwed up a little bit, because aftermarket rim choices are quite limited for our trucks in 17", at least in black finishes with a positive offset. But, I really like my tires, and I want to keep them. Plus, I don't want the extra expense of buying new tires and new rims at the same time. So, I'll most likely settle on some aftermarket 17's and keep my tires.

 

And yes, the 285/75/17's look much better than the 245's. I can't believe 245/75's are even an option on trucks this big. Heck, even the 265/70's that came on mine looked terrible. The 285/75's fill out the wheel wells much better.

  • Like 1
Posted

I wished I had pushed the dealer to swap the tires before delivery, too late now. I have noticed more choices in 70 series tires. I want a quiet tire that will not kill mpg. I have been looking at Michelin Defenders in 285/70 17s. Do you think that size would provide a similar look or is 285/75 17 the way to go? I don't want to risk any rubbing or loose too much mpg.

Posted

I wished I had pushed the dealer to swap the tires before delivery, too late now. I have noticed more choices in 70 series tires. I want a quiet tire that will not kill mpg. I have been looking at Michelin Defenders in 285/70 17s. Do you think that size would provide a similar look or is 285/75 17 the way to go? I don't want to risk any rubbing or loose too much mpg.

In my opinion, the 285/75's are the way to go! Mine have never rubbed at all, even with the GM splash guards. When I change the rims, they might rub a little, but I'm prepared to crank the torsion bars a few turns and trim a little plastic if necessary. I'm not sure about MPG loss, because I never drove it with the stock tires. I'm averaging around 12 MPG right now, according to the DIC, but my real MPG is probably a little better because my speedometer hasn't been corrected. There's lots of options in the 285/70 size you mentioned, and that size won't effect your MPG as much. However, I think they'll still look small...even though they'll look much better than the 245's. That's just my opinion though...does't make it right, haha.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Added some N-Fab bed access steps this weekend. Ordered them from 4 Wheel Parts. Installation was pretty straightforward. I was working by myself, so holding them in place to get the first bolt started on each side was a challenge. After that, it wasn't bad at all. Overall, I like them. They help hide the frame that hangs down, will protect the rocker panels from rock chips, and serve their main purpose of making it easier to enter and exit the cab.

 

e17ffb3a4d36ff66799db1b46340cdc5.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

I am looking into these for my '15 Silverado. I was just wondering if these secured onto the factory mounts? I currently have the GM factory 6" chrome running boards and am hoping they mount on the same areas.

 

Any issues with these or are you happy with them? I want a lower profile nerf bar as mine are too much chrome IMO and stick out like a sore thumb.

Edited by SilveradoSaver
Posted

 

 

I am looking into these for my '15 Silverado. I was just wondering if these secured onto the factory mounts? I currently have the GM factory 6" chrome running boards and am hoping they mount on the same areas.

 

Any issues with these or are you happy with them? I want a lower profile nerf bar as mine are too much chrome IMO and stick out like a sore thumb.

Yes, they secure to the factory mounts. Each step has 3 c-shaped brackets, with 2 mounting points on each bracket. So, there's 6 attachment points on each step (except the passenger side only has 5). They use the factory holes in the body, which I assume are the same ones the OEM steps mount to.

 

I haven't had any issues at all. I'm very pleased with them. My only complaint (if any) is that it took me a few tries to figure out the best way to use them to exit the truck.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Whiskey you inspired me to plastidip my door emblems black. Did you just carefully mask around it with masking tape? I've never used plasti dip before.

  • Like 1
Posted

Whiskey you inspired me to plastidip my door emblems black. Did you just carefully mask around it with masking tape? I've never used plasti dip before.

Nope, I actually just masked off a 2"-3" box around the emblems, and sprayed the plasti-dip on the emblems and the truck. Then, once it dries, you can peel it off the paint and it will stay on the emblem. It's super easy to use!

Posted

Installed new LED lights the other night. Went with Xenon Depot's extreme LED's for the lows, highs, and fogs.

 

They're a very nice improvement over the stock halogens. The light is much brighter and whiter. I'm not sure if the high beams carry as much distance as the stock high beams, but it's far enough, and they're much brighter up close.

 

Installation was a bit of a pain. The hardest part was getting the driver, can bus, and wiring to all fit inside the dust cap. They came with a grommet and instructions for drilling a hole in the dust cap and running everything outside the housing, but I didn't want to mess with that.

 

484e87a0eb832f2c71f2be3dafc24d90.jpg

 

My iPhone didn't want to focus with the high beams on

59b9315f74f6f6008a329498f747d7bd.jpg

 

Lows & fogs

cd1daa9d501c0579bcb7e613b7866421.jpg

 

High beams

1597d4f23a3c5f693cfc70a78bc634b3.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Posted

Man, that's a great looking truck! I LOVE the looks on the HD's, especially on the Chevys. Where the front end is such a bold design. Also, I know what you mean about the floor mats, they're absolutely terrible. I think I might get some Huskys this time around instead of the WeatherTech's.

  • Like 1
Posted

Man, that's a great looking truck! I LOVE the looks on the HD's, especially on the Chevys. Where the front end is such a bold design. Also, I know what you mean about the floor mats, they're absolutely terrible. I think I might get some Huskys this time around instead of the WeatherTech's.

Thank you! I'm very pleased with it! Yes, the Chevy HD's do have a very bold look to them. I can't believe how much tougher this truck looks when compared to my old 1500. And, I'd definitely recommend the Husky mats. They're a huge improvement over the inadequate factory floor mats.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you! I'm very pleased with it! Yes, the Chevy HD's do have a very bold look to them. I can't believe how much tougher this truck looks when compared to my old 1500. And, I'd definitely recommend the Husky mats. They're a huge improvement over the inadequate factory floor mats.

I thought about getting a HD, but I have no needs for one. I don't tow anything in 2 years, I know that's crazy! lol Plus the gas mileage too lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I thought about getting a HD, but I have no needs for one. I don't tow anything in 2 years, I know that's crazy! lol Plus the gas mileage too lol

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, they're not for everyone. It's a whole lot more truck than the 1500's though. It's nice to have a truck that I know can handle anything I ever want to do with it. My MPG is about 2-3 less than my old truck, which isn't too bad considering this one weighs about 1000 lbs more and has bigger, heavier tires.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Made some drastic changes to the looks of my truck this past week! First, I cranked the torsion bars 7 turns, which gave me 1.5" of lift in the front. I have quite a few threads left on the bolts, but at 1.5" of lift, there's still a lot of room between the UCA and the bump stop. The ride is pretty good too, just a bit more firm than when it was stock. I still have about 1.5" of rake left, which should be plenty for my use. I put 1000 lbs in the bed, and it sat just about level. It takes a lot of weight to squat these trucks over 2 inches!

 

I also had a new set of wheels installed. Went with KMC XD798 Addict, in a 17x9 with +18mm offset. Compared to the stock 17's, they give me just a bit more clearance on the inside, and stick out 1.75" more on the outside. The tires sit right at the edge of the fenders, but I drove in the rain the other day, and the side of my truck was still clean. My tires never rubbed before, at stock height, but they would rub with these wheels. In fact, even with 1.5" of lift, I'm probably going pull the fender liners back with zip ties, because they're super close when backing up with the wheels cranked. Under the right conditions, I'm pretty sure they'd rub. There's plenty of clearance on the mud flaps though.

 

Overall, I'm very happy with how it turned out! I can't believe how big these HD trucks are! Compared to my old 2012 1500 with a 2" lift, this thing is a monster, haha!

 

Here's a few pictures:

 

e862fd9b9da1f69eb167cbbd77a52639.jpg

 

87046eb8c3fb48f1181d5335c8d8c41f.jpg

 

a6aa2a9415f8a6c2c9897eb5cf79f416.jpg

 

a70f061d36602ce9a11265d6fb75e149.jpg

 

5d8ee6bf697cafb48661d086fdb08f8d.jpg

 

eaa94169df9e4ee0f143476ce09c05d5.jpg

 

b526035d7aaa478189b8cec836df63cf.jpg

 

adab4b6151c9e3cf464518d38e2b2073.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Edited by Big Whiskey
  • Like 2
Posted

Just what I'm looking to do !

 

Alignment after the crank ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...