Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Evening y'all,

 

I know the subject of AFM either deletion or disabling has been beat with a stick but as I was doing some digging I came across a couple of articles that had me wondering. So I recently just ordered a Range for my '16 5.3 and am/ was eager to install it but.... I read that when disabling AFM in the long run it can hurt the motor i.e. lifters. My question is, has anyone been running a AFM disable tune/ flash for a few years and had any issues?

 

Thanks guys 

Posted (edited)

Consensus on this website and others seems to be to delete AFM in any way possible as soon as possible, to eliminate oil usage and other potential problems; some say it results in smoother shifting and a better sounding exhaust, and most say it doesn't harm your fuel mileage too much at all.  Some folks think that having all 8 cylinders firing all the time is actually better for your engine in the long run.  

 

In 8 years on multiple forums, I have not heard of any damage caused by turning off AFM.  Seems like any damage is caused by not turning off AFM soon enough.  Yes, it is still possible to have AFM lifters fail after turning off AFM.  But that is due to faulty design or manufacture, not due to AFM being turned off.  All the Range V8 module does is turn off AFM.  Now, of course, it is possible to damage your engine if you use an aftermarket tuner to turn off AFM and install a high performance tune that requires higher octane fuel, and you continue to run regular fuel, or something like that.  And you still need to use the proper Dexos-rated motor oil and change it at the proper intervals, either way. 

 

I ran a Range V8 module for 4 years and then switched to a Hypertech Max Energy 2.0 tuner to turn off the AFM and tune other functions.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 4
Posted

Fully agree with what Bret said about oil and the use of a Hypertech tuner.  Now the truck just feels "right".

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My last truck was a 2014 5.3.  I had afm tuned out at under 1000 miles and returned it to stock 3.5 years later at 51,000 before trading it in.  I ran it for a couple months like that and no problems at all.  My current truck is a 2014 6.2 and now has 37k miles and is stock. Neither truck used any oil.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/6/2018 at 1:25 PM, MaverickZ71 said:

Consensus on this website and others seems to be to delete AFM in any way possible as soon as possible, to eliminate oil usage and other potential problems; some say it results in smoother shifting and a better sounding exhaust, and most say it doesn't harm your fuel mileage too much at all.  Some folks think that having all 8 cylinders firing all the time is actually better for your engine in the long run.  

 

In 8 years on multiple forums, I have not heard of any damage caused by turning off AFM.  Seems like any damage is caused by not turning off AFM soon enough.  Yes, it is still possible to have AFM lifters fail after turning off AFM.  But that is due to faulty design or manufacture, not due to AFM being turned off.  All the Range V8 module does is turn off AFM.  Now, of course, it is possible to damage your engine if you use an aftermarket tuner to turn off AFM and install a high performance tune that requires higher octane fuel, and you continue to run regular fuel, or something like that.  And you still need to use the proper Dexos-rated motor oil and change it at the proper intervals, either way. 

 

I ran a Range V8 module for 4 years and then switched to a Hypertech Max Energy 2.0 tuner to turn off the AFM and tune other functions.  

Understood, just wanted to get y'all's opinion on it. Like I had said, upon hundreds of people saying it's great, I found 3 maybe 2 articles stating the negatives. I'd rather real people's opinions. Also yes I agree about oil and stuff . 

  • 10 months later...
Posted

I have been using the Range OBD2 AFM disabler  on my C7 Corvette for awhile now its fantastic. Waiting for Range to certify the DFM version for my Silverado. I will be first in line. The motor is made to run on all cylinders  no worry about that.

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Hi guys I just installed in my 2008 Silverado and I like so far. Do I need to install a switch to prevent battery drain? I only dive it a few times a week. 
thank you in advance for any input. 
 

kevin

Posted
3 hours ago, Kevin vallem said:

Hi guys I just installed in my 2008 Silverado and I like so far. Do I need to install a switch to prevent battery drain? I only dive it a few times a week. 
thank you in advance for any input. 
 

kevin

No switch needed...if you're worried about it draining the battery, simply remove it from the OBD port.  No need in trying to re-invent the wheel

 

https://www.rangetechnology.com/blog/post/battery_draw/

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I know I'm new here and have been posting about this elsewhere, but can someone who has experience around here tell me if there have ever been any complaints of the Range causing mechanical engine problems?

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Worked just fine on my 2016 Tahoe.  No complaints; just more fun with the Hypertech tune installed and the AFM disabled with it.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

has anyone heard of havin engine failure/ruining your engine by putting a cat back exhaust on your 5.3L without disabling the AFM? 
 

ive recently purchased a ‘15 Sierra and I went to an exhaust shop to cut the stock exhaust off at the 3rd cat and put a y-pipe with dual 2.5” pipes out the back and they told me that when it switches to the 4-cylinder mode I could ruin my engine by not having enough back pressure. 
 

Anyone able to confirm/deny this from their experience?
 

I have a Range AFM disabler coming in the mail but it’ll take about 2 weeks to come in. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

WOW! Even though I just bought a 2008 Impala SS, this is all great information! I have been running in circles reading everything I can since I bought it. I really would like to throw in a simple exhaust, nothing crazy maybe just do a straight pipe or glass one. Disable the AFM and get a 91 tune. But we will see. Does anyone have experience with Diablo? Is HP hard to learn? Do you even want my car questions here lol? Any help is awesome!

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I’ve got a 2018 Sierra 50k miles and already has a cold start lifter tick. Would this make it worse or damage my lifters if I install? All I want is a long engine life don’t care about power or fuel mileage I just want my motor to last anybody have any ideas on what I should do? I can replace lifters for $2000 should I replace first ? I’m scared if I don’t fix now they will collapse and blow my motor 

Posted

These engines will make noise no matter what you do. It's either cold start piston slap or lifter tick. On some it's even the injectors on the GDI trucks, they are very loud when cold.


Spending all that money and getting the same noise afterwards isn't a smart idea to me. The range product or any other tuner that disables the AFM will not harm anything. Just know that just because the AFM is turned off doesn't mean that failure can't still happen. Those parts are still installed in the engine but just not being activated, they could still fail but nobody can tell you if or when.

 

I have 107k miles on my truck, it makes all sorts of sounds. Cold start oil pump noise (normal to hear), injector noise and lifter tick when cold. It sounds like every other LS/LT engine I've had for the past few years. If it doesn't sound like a sewing machine at times, then I'd think something is wrong lol.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 10/31/2020 at 12:17 AM, CamGTP said:

These engines will make noise no matter what you do. It's either cold start piston slap or lifter tick. On some it's even the injectors on the GDI trucks, they are very loud when cold.


Spending all that money and getting the same noise afterwards isn't a smart idea to me. The range product or any other tuner that disables the AFM will not harm anything. Just know that just because the AFM is turned off doesn't mean that failure can't still happen. Those parts are still installed in the engine but just not being activated, they could still fail but nobody can tell you if or when.

 

I have 107k miles on my truck, it makes all sorts of sounds. Cold start oil pump noise (normal to hear), injector noise and lifter tick when cold. It sounds like every other LS/LT engine I've had for the past few years. If it doesn't sound like a sewing machine at times, then I'd think something is wrong lol.

THIS.  The 5.3L in our '09 Silverado sounds like the first 45 seconds of Van Halen's Hot for Teacher song on every cold startup and even some warm startups.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...