Jump to content

Show Us Your 2019 & Up T1 Pictures !

Sierra Dan
 Share

Recommended Posts

TH3JUICEMAN Enthusiast

TH3JUICEMAN

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, StevenStarke said:

It WAS rubbing. I removed the brackets behind the rear of the fenderwells. And cut the mudflap/fenderwell.  It doesn’t look perfect but it’s fine for now.  Here are some pics 

0E366D1A-2578-414C-908B-A6DE0D17368E.jpeg

Hard to tell, but you had to do some metal cutting or just cutting of the liner?

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bowtie2007
bowtie2007

Finally arrived! Pacific Blue Sierra

Sotally Tober
Sotally Tober

Here is our new 2019 Silverado RST.  For details on all the modifications, here is a link to my build thread:    

z1boss
z1boss

Picked up my special ordered 2019 Trail Boss about 2 weeks ago.  Loving it so far.  Lots of mods already.

Posted Images

Mike Thomas Enthusiast

Mike Thomas

Posted
Posted
Picked it up over the weekend.
IMG_2530.thumb.jpg.8c7f4df9036ec4c8fe2df23217db7b09.jpg
Awesome looking truck - wish those wheels were available on the Silverado.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Mike Thomas Enthusiast

Mike Thomas

Posted
Posted
Not the best pic..will get more later5e04fa691ce8518c1b3d60eede11b455.jpg

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


Satin Steele ftw.


Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Booger T Enthusiast

Booger T

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, GMC-AT said:

Not the best pic..will get more later5e04fa691ce8518c1b3d60eede11b455.jpg

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

Love the satin steel color, what brand of hood protector do you have? Is that smoke black?

Booger T Enthusiast

Booger T

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, GMC-AT said:

AVS Hoodflector Bug Shield

Part #: AVS-21956

Thanks

Sierra Jon Enthusiast

Sierra Jon

Posted
Posted
Picked it up over the weekend.
IMG_2530.thumb.jpg.8c7f4df9036ec4c8fe2df23217db7b09.jpg
Looks soooo good. AT4 with a 6.2 will be the next rig for sure.
Pritz73 New Member

Pritz73

Posted
Posted
On 1/30/2019 at 11:42 AM, robsieb said:

Picked it up over the weekend.

IMG_2530.jpg

More picture when you get a chance. I’m in a black 2015 High Country now but want an AT4. Was going to go black again even though it is a PITA and this is the only other color I was considering but have not seen many. 

  • Like 1
robsieb Enthusiast

robsieb

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Pritz73 said:

More picture when you get a chance. I’m in a black 2015 High Country now but want an AT4. Was going to go black again even though it is a PITA and this is the only other color I was considering but have not seen many. 

I've had both a 2014 and 2016 All Terrain in black and really liked the 2019 AT4 in black but after two in a row I needed a change. I really wished they would offer the AT4 in the bright red but it was apparent they were never going to do it (although they do make the Elevation in that color). Haven't had a chance to shoot many more pics but here are a couple more.

IMG_2533.jpg

IMG_2534.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...