Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

My Silverado truck has about 120k miles and my warranty has already expired. It was raining all day long. The day after, I saw water drips coming out from the roof (see the attached photo).

 

I went to dealer to find out where does the leak come from. They did water test and told me the leak from the Shark Fin. It costs over $200 to re-seal it.

I asked them what would it cost to replace it, they told me it cost almost the same.

 

I'm thinking to DYI the sealing, but I couldn't see any topics illustrate that.

 

I'd appreciate any one can help me with this issue.

 

Thanks in advance.  

IMG_20190124_091427 leak.jpg

Posted

The dealer "replaced/fixed" it under warranty. It leaked again within a month of them working on it...So, I fixed it myself for the price of a tube of RTV/silicone.

 

Remove the A pillar trim, grab handle, sun visor, and center upper console. Then you can pull the headliner down enough to get your hands above it. Unplug the 2 plugs, and remove the bolt that holds the ant bracket. I think its 10mm, but it might be 8mm, I don't remember. The bracket only goes on one way, so pay attention. Pull the ant out, clean the sheet metal. I took my ant apart and cleaned and dried it. I silicone the crap out of it, then reinstalled. Hasn't leaked since. I did the 3rd brake light as well, because it'll leak too. The "gasket" on both is foam. Foam gaskets WILL eventually leak. Good luck...

  • Like 1
Posted

My antenna leaked and was repaired while under warranty.  It leaked again, post warranty, and my dealer replaced it at no charge.  They service manager said the new one is a better design and I shouldn't have anymore problems.  We've had several periods of heavy rain since this last repair and the cab is keeping dry.  I would recommend spending the $200 if they give you a reasonably long guarantee against future leakage.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yup. When i did the stereo in mine. I took off the a pillar and there was water in it. Black RTV. Done. I did all around the inner and outer seals. Now no water gets past the outer seal.

20180911_163627.jpg

20180911_171201.jpg

Posted

Had a leak in my roof, thought it was the moon roof but the dealer said it was the cab center brake light. Haven't had it set out in a downpour since, time will tell!

Posted

So glad I found this topic.  I too have water coming through the interior at the same spot but it will only come in while driving.  I'mstill under warranty so hoping the dealer will take care of this for me.  Thanks for sharing!

Posted

I don't know why they don't put some sealer on the inside of that like the did on all of the older vehicles just extra protection..

Posted

See pic above.  Its because that little gap in the gasket/seal.  Not sure why its not a solid piece all the way around.  I filled that gap with clear silicone and mine has been good since

Posted
57 minutes ago, BigBadSierra said:

I don't know why they don't put some sealer on the inside of that like the did on all of the older vehicles just extra protection..

GM’s pickup trucks combine for $65 billion in annual revenue. In rough math, just the heavy duty trucks bring in more than $2 billion in pretax income. Why in the world would they spend $.10 to make their product more enjoyable for the consumer? Answer; it's al about the money and making as much off each vehicle as possible. The operating profit on large pickups, is at least $12,000 apiece. We silly customers wouldn't want them to go hungry would we?

Posted

Does anyone know specifically which antennas are more prone to this? I seen a thread that some of the shark fins were bigger than others...But I think that thread was specifically comparing a 14 antenna to a 15 of some fashion.. 

 

Mine doesn't appear to leak... yet.... and i'm hoping it stays that way. But when it gets warmer here maybe I'll pull that and the high-mount stop light out and do some extra protection...

Posted
1 hour ago, g2full said:

Does anyone know specifically which antennas are more prone to this? I seen a thread that some of the shark fins were bigger than others...But I think that thread was specifically comparing a 14 antenna to a 15 of some fashion.. 

 

Mine doesn't appear to leak... yet.... and i'm hoping it stays that way. But when it gets warmer here maybe I'll pull that and the high-mount stop light out and do some extra protection...

The bigger antenna incorporates the WiFi wiring, so the newer ones are larger. They all have the same water intrusion seal. They also have a barrier seal (not water proof) that the antenna sits on so it doesn’t just sit on painted metal. Those all have a little gap. The older trucks had that gap in the back, the newer ones have the gap in the front. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the gap is there so IF water gets in, it can get out. I sealed mine completely. So no water in AT ALL... I sealed both the inside and the back open end of the seal.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/4/2019 at 9:05 PM, RACERX7775 said:

Yup. When i did the stereo in mine. I took off the a pillar and there was water in it. Black RTV. Done. I did all around the inner and outer seals. Now no water gets past the outer seal.

20180911_163627.jpg

20180911_171201.jpg

I had a leak with my sharkfin antenna a little over a month ago.  dealer tells me they replaced the antenna, and also silicone around it.  no leaks since.  i questioned if there was an issue with my antenna as mine looks like yours, with the little notch facing the back.  i look at others, and that notch faces forward.  my replacement antenna also has the notch towards the back.  lets hope we dont have more leaks down the road.

Posted
12 hours ago, SS502 said:

The bigger antenna incorporates the WiFi wiring, so the newer ones are larger. They all have the same water intrusion seal. They also have a barrier seal (not water proof) that the antenna sits on so it doesn’t just sit on painted metal. Those all have a little gap. The older trucks had that gap in the back, the newer ones have the gap in the front. 

my 2018 has the gap towards the back, with wifi.  my buddy's 2018 has the gap towards the front, with wifi.   same year.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...