Jump to content

Unique Position to perform bulletproofing of 2012 5.3 Silverado

TheStug
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

garagerog
garagerog

OP, I know you're focused on the engine, but with the bed off and over 100K on your vehicle, now might be a good time to switch out the in-tank fuel pump. Replace with Delco or Delphi.

CamGTP
CamGTP

There is no AFM plate in the oil pan. There is only a oil pressure relief valve on the pan where the oil filter goes, if you remove the AFM/DoD system you can remove the valve and plug the hole. You s

CamGTP
CamGTP

Never heard of that issue with the factory valves or springs. The 243/799 heads are some of the best ones ever made from the factory for a 4.8/5.3 engine, nothing but good things from them. Whichever

TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes, I did read that article by Super Chevy on the benefits of retaining VVT. This is part of the reason for my insistence on retaining VVT. I'm just very surprised that there simply isn't anything for Gen IV 5.3s... You would think these cam companies would realize some people want to retain VVT...

 

Cam motion of course said they didn't have anything for this, but referred me to Gwatney performance. Didn't see anything on their website for VVT cams, but I sent them an email, we'll see what they say.

 

Summit's site also lacks options, and also lots of cams with way too much duration...

 

No reply from Tick Performance yet...

 

I've been busy rebuilding a rock wall at my house, so I haven't had as much time as I'd like to surf the web for options and case histories.

 

 

  • Like 1
TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, I received a reply from Gwatney Performance. Here is the link supplied from one of their reps for a VVT compatible cam 

 

https://gwatneyperformance.com/product/gpi-lmg-vvt-cam-install-package-with-afm-dod-delete-for-2010-2014-silverado-5-3l/#gpi-vvt-camshaft-included

 

The specs for LLT1 VVT cam is listed at 21x/22x .55x/.55x 113+8.  Not sure why they mark x for the digit. Keeping it secret I guess. This seems to have higher duration than other "towing" cams and much more lift. Both probably being too much for me

 

So even though this works for VVT, if those numbers are right, I think it may be too aggressive for me. But I just understood the basics of cam figures a couple days ago. It also doesn't help that there's not much documentation on this particular cam.

 

I just found out a legendary Tuner lives close to me (less than 30 miles)… Ed Wright. I may end up giving him a call and ask if it's worth the hassle right now to retain VVT. I have read he did tune some VVT vehicles, so that is good to know. I would love to have him tune my truck once mods are finished. The direction I go in will depend a lot on how this conversation goes. I may end up just putting my truck back together for now (that's a chore in itself) and take my time to gather parts and perform the delete a little while later. It's very stressful at this point trying to get this done quickly. So I'm liable to make a mistake or a stupid decision I will regret later. Grille, fenders, hood are super easy to take off anyway... 

 

 

Apologies,

This is turning more into a "what *$!#_%@ cam do I get?! GAAAHHHHH someone just tell me and take my money!!!!!!" than a bulletproofing thread... 

 

Items to upgrade or replace so far....

1. Delete AFM system (remove cam and AFM lifters)

2. oil pickup o-ring

3. in tank fuel pump

4. rocker arm trunnion upgrade

5. hardened push rods (not 100% sure on that)

6. "towing" cam that won't affect longevity i.e.,

7. Lifter Guides

8. Valve Seals

9. New LS7 lifters to replace AFM lifters (just 8 or all 16?)

10. LS2 valley cover

11. LS2 chain dampener

12. cam bolt (for vvt)

13. crank bolt

14. Head bolts

15. Gaskets (Heads, timing cover, valley cover, not sure what else).

16. ???

  • Like 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 5/5/2020 at 11:16 PM, TheStug said:

I just found out a legendary Tuner lives close to me (less than 30 miles)… Ed Wright. I may end up giving him a call...

Sounds good and I agree with those cam specs being too high for a truck and tow vehicle.  Replace all of the lifters.

 

Might consider skipping the cam upgrade and instead cleaning up the heads with a 3-angle (or whatever they do to these LS heads) valve job and mild port and polish.  

TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Looks like Ed Wright is retired so that's out, but I looked around for some local tuners and got some good names. I should be alright there.

 

Ah, you forget I am wanting to remove the AFM lifters as a weak link. BUT, I hadn't considered having someone work on the valve seat to help gain some torque/power across the full rev range. Might as well while it's off the block right? I will look into it further, thanks for the recommendation!

 

So, I've been gathering part numbers and I'm a little stuck on this item. I've been learning a lot about this truck. I literally do not own any vehicles newer than 20 years old, so the change in PCV tech surprised me a bit. 

 

Valley cover - Is it really necessary to run the more expensive 12599296 (LS3 cover) $105 vs 12598832 $40? I've learned the 5.3 has PCV provisions in the valve covers, does not look like anything is coming out of the valley cover. I am not sure the LS3 cover is really necessary, so it seems a waste of money. Yes, I am planning on using the O-rings to block the oil flow from the DoD towers. rather than using NPT plugs or press in pieces.

 

Please correct me if I am wrong!

 

On a separate note, I've heard the PCV can cause some excessive oil consumption issues, and that they've "updated" to solve the problem, so I might look into that as well.

 

Also, i'm pretty sure I'm gonna go with the Cam motion stage 1 cam. Just undecided right now on getting the drop in version or the hi lift version. Or I might just say F IT and get stage 2 since they're the same danged price!

 

 

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

The 4.8 style valley cover is all you need, no reason to buy the most expensive cover out there.

TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, nearly time to purchase all the goodies.

 

I am looking at Cam Motion Stage 1 Truck cam.    200/204   114+3.

 

Two options- .501 lift or .527 lift.

 

My question here regarding this camshaft, will the .527 actually net much if any gains over .501 lift? I am just not sure if the additional lift will actually flow more (intake, head, exhaust restricted?) I wish there was a side by side dyno chart of those two with mainly stock engine. I'll look around for more cam options before finalizing purchase tomorrow probably.

 

Main goal is to move up torque/hp across the entire RPM range, not peak power. Hopefully, it'll actually improve MPG while making me faster and better at towing.

MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted (edited)

Your 2012 model already has the revised driver's side valve cover (with the modified PCV orifice) installed at the factory.  They changed that sometime in late 2010 or early 2011 I believe.  I had to have it installed under warranty (covered by a GM TSB) on our 2009 Silverado.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 5/14/2020 at 5:15 PM, TheStug said:

Ok, nearly time to purchase all the goodies.

 

I am looking at Cam Motion Stage 1 Truck cam.    200/204   114+3.

 

Two options- .501 lift or .527 lift.

 

My question here regarding this camshaft, will the .527 actually net much if any gains over .501 lift? I am just not sure if the additional lift will actually flow more (intake, head, exhaust restricted?) I wish there was a side by side dyno chart of those two with mainly stock engine. I'll look around for more cam options before finalizing purchase tomorrow probably.

 

Main goal is to move up torque/hp across the entire RPM range, not peak power. Hopefully, it'll actually improve MPG while making me faster and better at towing.

.501 would be my choice.

TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 hours ago, swathdiver said:

.501 would be my choice.

Any particular reason why you would pick .501 over .527? Just curious

 

I pulled the trigger on the .527 lift cam a few days ago, but they're on a 2 week lead time so it may not be too late for me to change the order.

 

It also turns out that some parts from GMpartsdirect are delayed "indefinitely" due to the coronavirus so I have no idea when I could get my parts. might have to shop elsewhere if I want it sooner.

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, TheStug said:

Any particular reason why you would pick .501 over .527? Just curious

According Hot Rod's testing, the 799/243 heads flow 243 and 176 CFM on their intake and exhaust at .500 lift.  At .600 lift these numbers go to 248 and 186.  To my way of thinking, this additional strain on the valvetrain is hardly worth it considering it would only yield about 5-8 horsepower at most.

 

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/surprising-hp-numbers-stock-ls-cylinder-head-test/

 

 

TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted
14 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

According Hot Rod's testing, the 799/243 heads flow 243 and 176 CFM on their intake and exhaust at .500 lift.  At .600 lift these numbers go to 248 and 186.  To my way of thinking, this additional strain on the valvetrain is hardly worth it considering it would only yield about 5-8 horsepower at most.

 

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/surprising-hp-numbers-stock-ls-cylinder-head-test/

 

Ohhhhhhh….. I actually read that article, but I found the flow data lacking. I see now that I didn't see the "show all" link or tab to expand to get to the flow table.... THAT HELPS A LOT! If I had seen that, I would have come to exactly the same conclusion and gone with .501, which I will do now that Cam Motion confirmed the cancellation of the camshaft.

 

Thanks swathdiver, and everyone, you've all been very helpful!

  • Thanks 1
  • 1 month later...
TheStug Enthusiast

TheStug

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Does anyone know of a good part number to vehicle cross reference site?

 

I just found that 12598832 (4.8 non DOD valley cover) has been discontinued. It wasn't (i think) before this whole coronavirus crap hit, but it was out of stock at GMPARTSGIANT at the time that I tried to order it. This parts unavailability and coronavirus backlog really pushed back the order of some parts.

 

I'd like to just input a part number and have it return a list of vehicles and engines that came with that part from the factory. I'm planning on getting this part from a junkyard, hence why I need to know. It would be a good tool for future junkyard searches anyhow.

 

Thanks

  • 2 months later...
Tahoe Bud New Member

Tahoe Bud

Posted
Posted
On 5/2/2020 at 2:04 AM, swathdiver said:

There is a guy who posted on two other forums his experiences with a mild truck cam by Cam Motion.  I am not a fan of high lift, long duration cams for a truck cam.  By long, I mean more than 210 degrees.  My thoughts are in the minority.  However, most who pick these "little" Stage cams trade away a lot of low end torque and raise their power band.  

 

When my time comes, I'm going to install either a Crane Cam 1449501 or a BTR "Truck Torque Cam".  The latter is not even made anymore (I want it anyway!).  These are single pattern camshafts designed to work without VVT, for pre-VVT 5.3 engines which is what I have.  They could work with VVT but are not optimized for it.  The Gen III L33 and the 2007-2009 Truck 5.3s with AFM all had that single pattern grind.  Last time I looked, there is NO information about the BTR camshaft and very little about the Crane offering.  Marken Performance posted engine dyno figures.  

 

When I used to build and race turbocharged engines 30+ years ago, most camshafts actually robbed power.  

Looking into this for my 2014 Tahoe.  I am looking for low end torque and hp improvement. I probably hang our in the 1,500 - 4,000 RPM rang under throttle( probably mostly between 2,000-3,000) so I want a low start point for my cam. I was very interested in the BTR tuck torque cam as well but have not seen anymore information on it. Do you have anymore information since this post? I spoke with them and they suggested Tuck low lift stage 2 and did not mention information about the torque cam.  But I think stage 2 starts hitting at 2,200 rpm. 

 

I also spoke with Crane Cam and they mentioned 1449541 and 1449041 and were really leaning on the 1449041. This is similar to the one you liked in the 1449501, however I can't see to find the one you mentioned on their site. Any thoughts on either of these? Compared to the BTR?

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 9/17/2020 at 12:52 PM, Tahoe Bud said:

Looking into this for my 2014 Tahoe.  I am looking for low end torque and hp improvement. I probably hang our in the 1,500 - 4,000 RPM rang under throttle( probably mostly between 2,000-3,000) so I want a low start point for my cam. I was very interested in the BTR tuck torque cam as well but have not seen anymore information on it. Do you have anymore information since this post? I spoke with them and they suggested Tuck low lift stage 2 and did not mention information about the torque cam.  But I think stage 2 starts hitting at 2,200 rpm. 

 

I also spoke with Crane Cam and they mentioned 1449541 and 1449041 and were really leaning on the 1449041. This is similar to the one you liked in the 1449501, however I can't see to find the one you mentioned on their site. Any thoughts on either of these? Compared to the BTR?

No new information here either.  The smaller Crane cam was discontinued but vendors still have some for sale.  

 

This guy, Thunderstruck, has several articles across various forums about his experiences with a drop-in Cam Motion camshaft.  Watch this video he took, motor doesn't seem labored as it rockets to 100 mph:

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • carkhz316
      2006 Silverado HVAC sensor location in dashboard

      By carkhz316 · Posted

      Oh yes, someone is going to be certainly hitting up GM service/ support for a 20 year old truck.
    • Deadwood
      primary drive belt tensioner

      By Deadwood · Posted

      I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • Deadwood
      10L1000 anyone with High Mileage ? I hate Damocles....

      By Deadwood · Posted

      New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • swathdiver
      6 Speed vs 8 Speed

      By swathdiver · Posted

      At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • GMCustomerService
      Will not stay in Reverse

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...