Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You can buy this Corvette off the shelf at any Chevy dealer.

Z06 is a true world-class supercar. Conceived on the track and engineered alongside the C7.R race car, Z06 features a lightweight and rigid aluminum space frame, as well as a supercharged 6.2L aluminum V8 engine delivering 650 horsepower and 650 lb.-ft. of torque.

 

However, I will acknowledge that a DOHC engine, all other things being equal, has more upside potential than a normally aspirated pushrod/cam in block engine. But, we aren't talking Formula 1, Indy Cars or off-shore cigarette race boats.. We're talking pickups.

 

However the Z06 isn't too good at the 1/4 mile tracks:

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/201121-tesla-destroys-zo6-corvette-every-time/

 

Corvette fanboys and excuses can be posted below now:

 

:nopity:

Posted

While we are talking pickups, check out the 3.5L V-6 EcoBoost specs on the 2017 Raptor, more HP, and torque, than your 6.2L V-8!

 

I guess you haven't seen any engine tests like this, worth the time to watch:

 

You can get whatever you want out of an engine if that's what your objective is and you want to invest the money. Case in point; Henry Ford II decided to stick it to Ferrari for going back on his agreement to sell to Ford. Henry put together a team headed by the late Carroll Shelby (who btw designed my logo while in a drunken stupor down at the Terilinqua Chili Cook off way back when, lol) who took a big ole 427 pushrod wedge head and beat Ferrari, swept 1,2,3, and its sophisticated DOHC engines, and did it for the next four years in a row. The big 427 was then outlawed by a displacement rule as I recall. Not refined enough for European sensibilities I suppose, lol :)

  • Like 2
Posted

Interesting, thank you for posting! I'm sure it was after that, that Ford came out with the 427 "cammer", that NASCAR banned.

Yup, it was later. Btw, by now you may have figured out that I'm oooold! So, I remember some of this stuff without googling. The Ford 427 cammer was their answer to the MOPAR 426 Hemi. As I recall, not going to bother with googling, the Cammer "may" have ran one race at which it blew everything, including the Hemi's, away. Bill France did not like that at all as Richard Petty, aka The King, was a huge draw at the gate. So, anyway, France banned the Cammer. However, it lived on and thrived in NHRA drag racing. Btw, if you should find one abandoned in a barn somewhere you will have hit the lottery, worth a bunch of money.

  • Like 1
Posted

I apologize for being off topic, but while we are talking Ford 427 "cammers" this is one of the most beautiful cars I saw at SEMA:https://bob-ayers.smugmug.com/SEMA-55-Chevy-with-Ford-427/

 

I've enjoyed our technical discussion!

Yah, it was fun! I wouldn't worry about drifting off in the weeds. This forum has slowed way down and I'm guessing my good friend "rdnckhntr94" who is this forums administrator may very well appreciate the extra clicks. Btw, I'm not anti Ford, got a neighbor a block over who owns a black Ford GT and when he has in his driveway I drool with envy as I drive by. Watched one sell on Barrett-Jackson a few days ago for $250K, out of my league for sure, lol!

Posted

Hold on just a second, if this thread is going to go off the rails I'm getting back in !!!!!!

 

 

J/K

Sorry to see this is still going on.

Posted
Hold on just a second, if this thread is going to go off the rails I'm getting back in !!!!!!

 

Hey Bill,

Long time no see! What's that big white tub you're driving? Next time there will probably be a pic of Dodge Voyager, lol ! All is good here, still happy with my LTZ (there, we are back on topic, haha). Been to Argyle lately? I've been craving some Babes fried chicken. But, my wife is eating healthy, greens, twigs, fruit and berries. So, I'm eating healthy too ! Well, Rumor is GM Will do a major retool for model year 19 on the Silverados and the Sierras. Maybe all the shake problems will be corrected, we'll see! Hey, don't be a stranger as we say down here in Texas! God Bless Texas !!!!

Posted

Oh trust me, you won't be seeing a Dodge.

 

It is a 2017 Sequoia, needed something easier for hauling the dogs around than the Tundra. But now as the dogs get bigger and I get even older I am wishing i got a minivan lol

 

So if they are doing a retool for 2019 i'm guessing the 2018's will still have the issue, so sad :(

Posted

"So if they are doing a retool for 2019 i'm guessing the 2018's will still have the issue, so sad :( "

===========

Yup, agree. Having spent thirty five years as a manufacturing/operations mgr, I'm fairly well versed in statistics, SPC, 6 sigma and such and understand that variability is the enemy. Anyway, the dudes chatting up the frame, frame beaming and such are getting real close to what is exhibiting the problem. I tend to see the root causes to be many. And, the current frame, being stiffer with higher tensile strength than past frames is more of an enabler than a inhibitor than previous frames. The bearer of bad news is another way to say it. Seems to me that there are numerous in-process fixes that could be applied to mitigate shake and vibration till GM can retool. I've wondered why GM doesn't do something similar to what Ford did with the F-150 and simply install large rubber pads attached between frame and cab. Anyway, this is out of my wheel house. Should be interesting though.

  • Like 2
Posted

 

I have a 2017 and it has a slight vibration. I've already removed the driveshaft and had it checked for balance and of course it checked out fine. I've also removed the rear tires and found out the rear axel flange seems to be out of round. I'm hoping that is the cause and also my next step with the dealership.

 

My drive shaft was both out of balance and not straight. After addressing that at Advance Driveline, there was a significant improvement. The dealer still says I have three bad tires (after Firestone replaced them four times - changing brands as well). Firestone checked them again, and reported that they disagree with the dealership's assessment (of course). I think Firestone is correct. I don't have a wheel hop. I have a high-frequency, very mechanical, vibration.

Posted (edited)

back from trip to Fort Wayne Indiana all was smooth , Saturday morning got in truck and headed south on I-77 and the shake was back again !!! Started shaking at about 60 MPH , after about 20 miles shaking stopped !!! This dam truck is like a crazy woman !!!! LOL

 

oops noticed some of my gas mileage was up at 25.3 MPG on the trip

Edited by farml1234
Posted

Post 35% front tint (max legal) and detail yesterday. Loving that deep black reflection! Sorry about the pics. I had to compress them to get them uploaded so they don't look as good as it really does.

post-145883-0-68094100-1496240458_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-61887800-1496240459_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-37104500-1496240460_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-15285300-1496240461_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-68094100-1496240458_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-61887800-1496240459_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-37104500-1496240460_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-15285300-1496240461_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-68094100-1496240458_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-61887800-1496240459_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-37104500-1496240460_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-15285300-1496240461_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-68094100-1496240458_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-61887800-1496240459_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-37104500-1496240460_thumb.jpg

post-145883-0-15285300-1496240461_thumb.jpg

Posted

Is the paint as thin as the GM black paint? I have only ever hand washed mine and dried w/ microfiber towels and it has scratches everywhere.

 

 

And to update my vibration nonsense GM is still saying that my truck is operating as normal even though it makes me nauseous..

 

That's alright though. The local dealers have been seeing a lot of my lemon driving through their lots. They just shake their heads but nobody has approached me yet.

Posted (edited)

Is the paint as thin as the GM black paint? I have only ever hand washed mine and dried w/ microfiber towels and it has scratches everywhere.

 

 

And to update my vibration nonsense GM is still saying that my truck is operating as normal even though it makes me nauseous..

 

That's alright though. The local dealers have been seeing a lot of my lemon driving through their lots. They just shake their heads but nobody has approached me yet.

I want to say that its a better paint, but I honestly have no idea. I did have a few hairline scratches in the clear coat on my truck but the detail got them out... or hid them lol

 

have you ever done a clay bar or had it professionally detailed? I get my vehicles detailed 1-2 times a year (every spring and sometimes in the fall depending on my schedule) and I maintain it myself the rest of the year. A good clay bar with a polish and wax applied and a buffer will go a long long way.

 

if you don't already have one, get a grit guard for your wash bucket and have a different set of towels for drying and washing, don't mix them.

Another thing is to make sure you use an actual car soap. Standard dish soap like many people use will strip the wax that has been applied which will end up hurting the paint. The only time you should ever consider using a dish soap is if you're intentionally trying to strip the wax and intend to reapply it right away.

 

Driven Perfection - I got their Stage 2 Complete - Does Interior and Exterior for $245 (I live in Massachusetts)

 

I used the location in your profile to check out a few detailers in your area. These guys seem to be really good, check out their Complete Exterior Detail Package or their Full Service Detail (Basically the Stage 2 Complete Package I got that does Interior and Exterior).

First Class Auto Detailing

 

If your feeling really ambitious and have a little extra cash to throw around check out the ceramic pro coating. a buddy of mine owns a different shop than the one I went to, its too far away for me to use, but he LOVES these ceramic coatings, they are expensive though.

Edited by 2016 Ferd
Posted

GM has officially closed my case and told me to live with the vibrations. I filed the BBB complaint but think I would rather just hire a lawyer and do the lemon law.

 

Which is the best direction for a quick resolution? Ready to go buy a Ram Rebel. Done with GM forever - lousy lousy customer service.

  • Like 1
Posted

GM has officially closed my case and told me to live with the vibrations. I filed the BBB complaint but think I would rather just hire a lawyer and do the lemon law.

 

Which is the best direction for a quick resolution? Ready to go buy a Ram Rebel. Done with GM forever - lousy lousy customer service.

Lawyer + Lemon Law = Live Longer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...