Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just like any other truck that puts up with salt from the winter roads or lives by an ocean breeze. It is a 12-13 year old truck after all.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the main problem is what they put on the roads in the winter combined with owners not doing some kind of rust preventative each year. My trucks frame is still solid for a used 230k mile truck, but I had to do the maintenance on it to get it back to good shape. I think a few more years of it being left go would have made it a lost cause.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I've got a similar problem with my 2003 2500 4WD Suburban. I've had numerous issues with it - all I believe related to rust. I've had to replace brake lines, the rear bumper is rusted out - the frame is really rusty - etc.

 

Since Chevy doesn't even make a 2500 series Suburban any more - I've got a quandary on my hands, because I really anticipate needing to have the services of a truck like this for the next 20 years or so. I only drive it maybe 5-6000 miles a year at best - but when I need it - I need it.

 

The way I see it - I have a few options:

 

1) Do a restoration on this truck. The body itself is in pretty good shape. It's really the undercarriage and frame that need attention. I'm thinking that pulling the body off and doing a full frame resto - or even getting a new frame (somebody actually has one available locally for $2k) - and then carefully prepping, painting and rustproofing that new frame with an eye towards longevity - might give me a truck that will last for a good many years to come

 

2) Selling this truck and picking up a later year GMT800 2500 series Suburban with low miles (I've seen a few for sale with as little as 30k) - and then carefully prep that to ward off rust.

 

3) Go to a GMT900 2500 series Suburban and try to get to it before it gets rusty.

 

Question: has anybody here removed the body from the frame on one of these trucks - is it a huge pain in the butt job?

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

My 03 still looks decent somehow, But the previous owner of my 99 must not of washed it or undercoated it at all...

 

 

100_2024.jpg

 

100_2026.jpg

 

100_2025.jpg

 

But I fixed it better than new...

 

100_2035.jpg

 

100_2031.jpg

 

100_2037.jpg

 

Later this summer I plan on parking it fr a bit and going over it with a sandblaster and coating it all with chassis saver, I will also use Fluid film fr the rest of the trucks life.

  • Like 2
Posted

My 2006 was pretty bad at 230k. Mainly just surface rust, not to much came off in chunks.

 

attachicon.gifIMG_20140802_201551051.jpg

This is how my 2000 looked. The 04 is spotless
Posted

I am not impressed with the "look" of my frame. i have an annual rust check service done and have a full warranty with them. the wax was peeling starting in 2012. i used to spray rust check black paint to help keep it protected. i had installed in the fall of 2013 a gm wheel well protector. we have bad witness here, but my truck gets rinsed off daily. that is right daily. i also gets hand washed several times a week. still when i am under neath, i have concerns with keeping this truck long term. but it is what it is. in fact i figure i wash it so much, that i have caused my dash board to crack!!!!! :)

Posted (edited)

Sorry to hear, but did you ever undercoat it? We Krown (rust control) our 2004 every year, after a thorough bath in the spring. All cross members were dripping with oil after the Krown was sprayed. Traded the 04 off last week, frame was solid.

 

My 2011 will be getting the same treatment.

Edited by WilliamBos
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Figured this was a good thread to post this in.

 

I just found out about this place yesterday from somebody on another forum.

 

Co. is located in Rhode Island and specializes in frame rust repair and vehicle rustproofing.

 

https://www.autorust.com/in-house-service/

 

The guy who sent me the info - said he had a car done by them about 20 years ago and the thing is still on the road and going strong.

 

 

  • 6 months later...
Posted

My 03 still looks decent somehow, But the previous owner of my 99 must not of washed it or undercoated it at all...

 

 

100_2024.jpg

 

100_2026.jpg

 

100_2025.jpg

 

But I fixed it better than new...

 

100_2035.jpg

 

100_2031.jpg

 

100_2037.jpg

 

Later this summer I plan on parking it fr a bit and going over it with a sandblaster and coating it all with chassis saver, I will also use Fluid film fr the rest of the trucks life.

 

 

I noticed the replacement cross member tube is straight tubing versus the obvious curve in the factory tube. Doesn't the straight tube cause the gas tank to sit down in back at an angle? I am just preparing to do the same repair to my 1999 Silverado and it would sure be a lot simpler to use a straight tube instead of fabricating one with a curve.

 

MichaelJT

Posted

From what I've heard is keeping your vehicle in a garage. Especially if it is heated can speed up the corrosion process.

 

I keep my trucks in my heated garage and don't have any issues

Posted (edited)

tubes and box beams... gone like the 1940s.

I love welding, had to learn a lot. subaru played with tubes in the 80s... non-stop fail.

 

If you can rid of amperage, the anode attraction will stop.

 

Salt is not the issue. You attract salt to a steel breakdown? you got uranium, outer space, somebodies septic tank, a city drain cover, beach sand, and whatver we let out of our backsides.

 

the frame needs an "out" to stay alive, not an "in."

 

LED lighted trucks are going to leave the new wimpy trucks called strong.. even though they are no different.

 

Real shame. I just browsed photos of 2 cylinder boxer trucks from the turn of the 18th century... 10000 times the wieght of the engine on flexing c-rails and solid tires. All .Day. Long.

 

GM ought to be embarassed today.

 

I took in the last of the old c-rails, already did my crude welding. it was in great shape. 19 years, 350k. It did hve an atomic event to get through it all.. should have expected bizarre anyway.

 

 

the spare tire is another catalyst, until the silicon blended years.. that is actually not all that old ya know. maybe 10-15 years ago before the real good stuff came out.

 

 

kudos to that welding, it is well worth it for the trucks. Don't be afraid of the ugly steel.

Edited by barry G
Posted

 

 

I noticed the replacement cross member tube is straight tubing versus the obvious curve in the factory tube. Doesn't the straight tube cause the gas tank to sit down in back at an angle? I am just preparing to do the same repair to my 1999 Silverado and it would sure be a lot simpler to use a straight tube instead of fabricating one with a curve.

 

MichaelJT

Good eye...The tank is unnoticeably lower, You would literally have to measure it to tell a difference. But that being said where you will notice a difference is with your gas tank strap bolt. I used a threaded rod and a nut instead to make it easier. If you want I can take a picture of it all back together so you can see how it looks.

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the reply. I figured it would have to be that way. What is it about the straight tube that necessitates the threaded rod and nut?

 

I used threaded rod and a nut to attach tank strap in my former 2000 Silverado but that was just because the spring nut broke and I had to drill it out. I made my own T-nut for the top out of steel bar stock. A matter of using what i had on hand.

 

I have my 1999 apart now and and I am beginning the repairs to the rusted portions of the crossmembers. There is very little detailed documentation on the web for this particular repair and yours is among the best.

 

Please post the picture here as I am sure it would benefit others besides me.

 

Thanks!

MichaelJT

Edited by MichaelJT
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Well, I know why you needed the threaded rod and nut. The strap is actually too short to reach the bracket. I fixed it by modifying the strap to be longer there and that fixed it. The strap had already been cobbled together because of rust by the previous owner and i just cut out that shoddy work and made it the correct length. Lots of work replacing all those cross members and gussets but very satisfying. I'm ready for another 16 years now.

 

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

 

MichaelJT

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

post-141672-0-54533500-1450136237_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Compression test? Weird noises? Fuel trims?
    • I suspect at some point in the near future, the hardware will be free and you pay a subscription to access the vehicle - alldata style.
    • I've been eyeing an upgrade to my tonneau cover for a bit now.  Intrigued by the BAK MX4 EZ-Lift with the torsion spring and went for the upgrade.  Thoughts and musings during unpacking, install and a few days of usage.   Once my order went into Realtruck, it took about 4 days to ship.  Unfortunately, FedEx Ground destroyed the box and contents and it was unusable upon receipt.  To Realtruck's credit, one email with pictures and an RMA was sent to me to send the first one back, and another unit was shipped out.  It arrived 3 days later, unscathed.   I opened the box and it looked like every other BAK MX4.   Biggest differences are the rails and retaining clamps, and of course the spring attached to the cover itself.     NOTE - if you are upgrading from a MX4 to the EZ-Lift, you will have to replace the rails.  The EZ-Lift rails have a notch cut in them to allow the new style retaining clamps to fit properly.  The new retaining clamps also have 2 knobs/carriage bolts and there are two tracks underneath the front panel. The strap clips are mildly different (more like the Undercover Flex clamps) in that the screws go in from the underside.  Personally I prefer these over the BAK clamps that use the nutserts that are a nuisance to install.  The remainder of the parts in the box (drain tubes, rail clamps, and bumper pads) are standard issue BAK.     I did not replace my front bed seal at the time because it seemed to be in decent shape.   BAK recommends shims on the GM trucks unless you place the clamps on the flanges about 1/3 of the way in from both the front and rear of the bed.  I shimmed the front and the middle, and initially placed the clamps equidistant.  This also turned out to be a mistake, because when I set the cover in place, the new style retaining clamps wouldn't clear the front clamp.   New style clamp inserted in the track:     And the issue which occurred because the front rail clamp was too far forward:     Once I removed the shim from the front of the bed, and slid the clamp back to the front flange, everything cleared fine.     The cover set on the rails without issue and I installed the strap clamps.  After I completed my adjustments, I pulled the pin to activate the torsion spring.  Mistake #3 on my part.  PULL THE PIN AS THE VERY VERY VERY LAST STEP!  The reason is, once you pull the pin, the torsion spring is activated.  If you have to loosen the front clamps and adjust the cover, the front panel will - by virtue of the spring, refuse to lay down.  The only way to get it to lay down so you can reinstall and tighten the clamps is to fully open the panel against the back of the cab, which will then allow the front panel of the cover to lay down and be tightened.  Not a big deal unless you haven't installed the foam pads yet (typically the last step) because minus the foam pads, you will need to place something between the frame of the cover and the back window so it doesn't get scratched.  The next time I install one I will install the foam pads before I pull the pin and activate the spring.   After using it for a few days:   The spring assist is great.  You literally can open it with one hand.  My shoulders aren't getting any younger and this was part of my motivation to swap out. The second panel latches and unlatches itself as you open and close the cover.  Neat in concept, however it took me a minute to get used to closing the cover and not hearing the "latching" sound that would tell me it was locked in place. The paddle handles are a huge upgrade and I wouldn't be surprised to see them become the standard across the Realtruck line.  They effectively eliminate the concern that a thief could coat hanger the cover open and get to the contents in the bed. I'm not sure why the very front panel on my cover has a different finish from the other 3 panels.  I have a request into Realtruck to find out if mine was not manufactured properly or if it was by design.   All in all I'm pleased.  Same level of protection, looks good, keeps stuff mostly dry (they all leak around the tailgate) and easy to install.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...