Jump to content

AIRAID Modular Intake Tube on my 5.3 Silverado


VdellaV

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
17 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

Sorry, I'm talking about a stock intake box.  Part #5 is the insert I'm talking about.  You can see an oval impression at the bottom of part #5 just above the bottom clip.  In some applications, that oval portion is opened up, however unlike all the 6.2's I've seen, mine was not.  What I did was open up the entire "checkered" area below the stock horned opening all the way down to the bottom clip.  Now the stock intake box (no number in above diagram) matches the insert openings including the sometimes open, sometimes closed oval portion.  What I did was open up the stock intake box to match the now opened up insert. 

 Got it, i will see how to do the same

 

 Thanks for the input

Posted
Sorry, I'm talking about a stock intake box.  Part #5 is the insert I'm talking about.  You can see an oval impression at the bottom of part #5 just above the bottom clip.  In some applications, that oval portion is opened up, however unlike all the 6.2's I've seen, mine was not.  What I did was open up the entire "checkered" area below the stock horned opening all the way down to the bottom clip.  Now the stock intake box (no number in above diagram) matches the insert openings including the sometimes open, sometimes closed oval portion.  What I did was open up the stock intake box to match the now opened up insert. 
I have 6.0. I opened up the fender well side and the bottom of the box. Cheap easy mod.

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

Posted
9 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

Wet

I have also cut out my oval, but using the stock filter now.

Have you noticed any throatier sound or throttle response/performance improvement?

I just can't see spending hundreds on a CAI system.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

I have also cut out my oval, but using the stock filter now.

Have you noticed any throatier sound or throttle response/performance improvement?

I just can't see spending hundreds on a CAI system.

I agree.  I have the MIT intake tube from my 5.3 that I bought used for $100.  The 5.3 and the 6.2 use the same tube,  just different tube to throttle body hose (no neck down for the 6.2).  I put the MIT tube on and noticed a decent difference in sound with the stock box and filter.  However, when I opened up the intake box and insert and installed the green filter it made a lot of difference.  A lot louder, it vibrates interior trim at times.   As far as performance goes, hard to tell, truck felt a little lighter, but hard to say. 

 

FYI, I still have my original complete stock box. 

Posted
3 hours ago, DEV1ST8R said:

Anybody have pictures of their modified stock intake box/inlet?

There's an oval cutout in the fender and a very obvious oval in the mold on the cover that line up, you just cut out the inside of that oval for more air. There's a thread on here with all the info but it took me less than 20 minutes with a utility blade and a small saw.

Posted
1 hour ago, BigBlueLB756 said:

 

Reading this gets me interested on the Green Filter, based on sheer performance in flow,  but how much dust would it let pass ?

 

It would be amazing for a street Truck... "Its a Stock 5.3, Bro" 

Posted

I run the Green panel filter in the 'Hoe and replaced the K&N cone filter in my intake set-up with the Green cone filter.  Was time to clean it, anyway.

When you clean and re-oil these filters, just pack them overnight in a bunch of paper from your shredder and you will be GTG as far as too much oil.

 

 

100_0767.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
    • On my wife's 2020 Blazer (~69000 miles), we started to notice the brakes pulsating at faster speeds. Typically around town you don't notice anything, but highway/interstate driving you will notice it. I decided to pull of the front tires and look at the brakes. I figured with the milage, the pads should be wearing out to their life span, but they actually looked decent. Still with "meat" on them. One pad has a ridge wearing in it, and that same rotor is showing the ridge too. That's not the concerning part...the other rotor appears to have a raised bump on it!  The picture make it look like a pimple! Very odd and strange! NOTE: These are the factory brakes and rotors.   I'm attaching pictures of the front brakes and what they look like ate ~69000 miles.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...