Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello all,

 

2005 GMC Sierra 1500 4x4 L33 5.3 with 208k miles.

 

I did some research, and found that my oil pickup tube o-ring is most likely causing my oil pressure 'issues'

 

The 'issue' is that in the morning during the first start up of the day, the oil pressure registers low enough to trigger the low oil pressure warning. At idle in PARK it will usually stabilize (when cold) between 5 and 20 psi, but it will drop below that when idling in DRIVE as well, during the first few minutes of operation.

 

Asthe engine warms up, the oil pressure increases, and generally driving down the road when cold it reads 20 psi, when warm its 30-35 psi.

 

Like I said, I believe the culprit is the pickup tube o-ring.

 

My question is, what is involved in dropping the oil pan to replace this $5 part? Do I HAVE to remove the front diff and everything associated with it?

Edited by jmpidgeo
Posted

Damn, 3 hours isn't bad at all. Probably would take me at least 3 times that to get the job done assuming nothing went wrong! Whaddya have access to? Alldata or something like that? I wish I could still access alldata. Would be amazing.

Posted (edited)

Damn, 3 hours isn't bad at all. Probably would take me at least 3 times that to get the job done assuming nothing went wrong! Whaddya have access to? Alldata or something like that? I wish I could still access alldata. Would be amazing.

You can buy a 1 year subscription to Alldata for about $26. Multi year subscription is less per year

Edited by txab
Posted (edited)

Brought it to the shop today. Hopefully they come up with the same explanation to my oil pressure issues, the low pressure when cold that gradually increases with oil temperature just seems to make this repair make sense. I'll gladly pay 3 hours of labor for the fix to save me the headache of dropping the pan. If they want me to replace the oil pump for some reason...I won't be very happy LOL.

 

At least my loaner 2013 GMC 1500 truck with 800 miles on it is freaking sweet!

Edited by jmpidgeo
Posted

a salesman usual haunt is the service dept for people having issues as yours and a loaner is close to a deal as ever lol,,,,,

 

i took a sales course once for giggles and ya ,,,they go there for a sale

Posted (edited)

turns out that the tech, lead engine tech, shop foreman, and GM think that the oil pump is the culprit since the seal at the pump and pickup tube was 'good'...so its getting a new oil pump. oh well, its only money LOL

 

edit: I would rather spend the money now rather than toasting my engine later, even if the pump may not be 'bad'

Edited by jmpidgeo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...