Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks, GeorgeMJ. That’s what I was thinking of doing, mounting another. I was just hoping there would be a quick fix or some step I was missing. Also, my FM comes in fine so no worries there. 

Posted

You might want to check the antenna connection, though, as there are situations where the FM would work well but not the AM.  A poor connection would cause that, allowing the high frequencies of FM through the small capacitor created by the bad connection but blocking the lower AM frequencies.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

GM has ended my paid Sirius radio. Still no fix for our radio reception? Wonder how the new models reception is?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I didn't read through this post, but I had horrible XM reception in my 2015 Sierra Denali. Any little tree branch, building, anything would cause it to cut out. It was to the point that I couldn't even listen to it while driving on residential streets. I had thr shark fin antenna replaced. It works great now. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

That's great but this thread is about regular radio reception, not satellite reception.  I have never been a big fan of the sound of satellite radio, to compressed and not near the sound quality of CD IMO.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I had a 2014 silverado 1500 WT with the cheapo 3inch screen radio and my reception was great and I had FM HD channels.  Now with my 2018 2500HD with a bigger screen radio I don't get HD channels but reception is ok 

Anybody could tell me how to get HD channels I'm in the DFW area and there is plenty of HD to go arround.

Posted

Either your truck radio doesn't offer HD or you don't have it turned on.  My suggestion would be to get your owners manual out and read up on it.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

On a side note, has anyone tried doubling the lenght of the antana to see if this helps..?

I can't read the entire thread, but how about swapping in Alpines radio version for our Trucks, and make GM pay the bill?

Edited by flyingfool
  • Haha 1
Posted
On ‎7‎/‎12‎/‎2018 at 2:22 PM, tnchevy said:

That's great but this thread is about regular radio reception, not satellite reception.  I have never been a big fan of the sound of satellite radio, to compressed and not near the sound quality of CD IMO.

I'm guilty...I incorrectly bundled radio and satellite into the same category. I agree 110% on the sound quality statement, the CD is much better...so is the HD FM reception. 

  • 6 months later...
Posted

2014 Silverado Z71 radio is changing screens on me when in radio mode on main touch screen and the dashboard screen. Anybody had this problem before?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I want to re-install the stock AM/FM antenna mast. Of course, now I can't find the threaded adapter, it goes between the base and the mast.  Anyone got an extra they don't need? 

 

Thanks ,

John

2017 Silverado LT

Posted (edited)
On 8/26/2019 at 7:54 PM, mojohn said:

I want to re-install the stock AM/FM antenna mast. Of course, now I can't find the threaded adapter, it goes between the base and the mast.  Anyone got an extra they don't need? 

 

Thanks ,

John

2017 Silverado LT

When I got my 2014 it had a shorty antenna on it and radio reception was awful. I thought it was the shorty antenna so I went to the junkyard and pulled a few different types of antennas. These did not fix the FM reception to my liking but, my point to you would be try hitting the local pull a part and seeing if you can grab the part you are looking for.

 

 

Did anyone ever get FM radio reception better than factory yet with the stock radio?

Edited by Eddie 70
  • 1 month later...
Posted

just build a new antenna, take your oem one, and double the length, this will guarantee way better reception...

  • 6 months later...
Posted

My wife drives a 2017 GMC Acadia and the radio has the same issue with reception being staticky on stations that are crystal clear on my 2015 Impala radio and was on her older Lexus.  It is annoying and we too wonder how to correct it if possible.  Will be searching for more information or upgrade.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can someone tell me where the video processing module is in a 2023 Silverado? I'm getting conflicting results that it's in the front passenger area or the rear passenger area behind the seat.
    • Yes I agree, its what amounts to free advertising to let people know about his UOA testing company, and not that there is anything wrong with that but certainly that is a motivator for putting out videos about the science of oil as well as other topics such as oil and air filtration etc. The interesting part I found with his last video is not only the physics behind the reason for the varying wear due to a diesels working torque range causing more bearing load and that higher viscosity oil is of benefit, it was also that the chemistry behind the GM Dexos 0W-20 and the Mobil Dexos licensed 0W-20 are far enough apart that its showing up with a difference in wear even though the two oils are matched in viscosity and in that comparison viscosity was not having the finger pointed at it.    There are a few youtubers out there or one anyway that I have watched a bit of who has gone through the pains of accessing various countries manuals for a certain engine platform and while in the US/Canada it may say use 0W-20 or what have you for some Toyota product, in some other countries it sings a very different tune for the very same engine with the typical traditional oil viscosity/ambient temperature charts to help choose which oil viscosity is correct for the conditions the vehicle will be used in and in some cases its taken an engine in a US manual that states only use 0W-20 as per warranty coverage and yet that same engine in certain other countries may have up to a 15W-40 etc oil option that meets the spec. Another words the guy who is driving through Death Valley or Phoenix and south weather at 120f is often being fed a line of bs by the US system that has forced vehicle companies to restrict the warranty to a specific low viscosity oil for anterior reasons as well as the long drain interval suggestions.    Thankfully youtube is free ( yet anyway ) for viewers to sift through information and of course comes with the good and the bad ( truth and lies ) and we can choose to turn off/not watch what a person finds is bs or just not interested in the topic.         
    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...