Jump to content

GM NOT CONCERNED ABOUT OUR SAFETY


amitch70

Recommended Posts

Posted

No sahla01gmc, Fed helping some close locals. Thank you for those of you that had adult level replies.

 

Chris you may be right about what it may have felt like and for what i dwelt with I consider it a safety issue.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

It's no way it went from 5th to 1st, especially going that fast. The only way it would is if you had it in manual mode and you lowered the max gear down to 1st which would be your fault and not the truck's fault. I'm thinking what happened was what jbreed said. That you were actually going a little over 95 and the governor kicked in at 98. It feels like it downshifts but it's cutting power for a second. I believe that's what happened since you said it only did it briefly.

Posted

No sahla01gmc, Fed helping some close locals. Thank you for those of you that had adult level replies.

 

Chris you may be right about what it may have felt like and for what i dwelt with I consider it a safety issue.

My 4 speed will drop to 2nd at 70 mph and it feels like 1st and goes. But the programming is smart enough to know limits on speed and rpm for each gear. It wont drop to a gear if component damage is a risk. but seriously with the issues you are having with the truck and dealer, call GM and make a complaint about the dealer not wanting to work with you to find the issues and deal with the Better Business Bureau. They will deal with the dealer and help get tou out of that truck if in fact it is a Lemon
Posted

My 4 speed will drop to 2nd at 70 mph and it feels like 1st and goes. But the programming is smart enough to know limits on speed and rpm for each gear. It wont drop to a gear if component damage is a risk. but seriously with the issues you are having with the truck and dealer, call GM and make a complaint about the dealer not wanting to work with you to find the issues and deal with the Better Business Bureau. They will deal with the dealer and help get tou out of that truck if in fact it is a Lemon

I was thinking the same thing. It's not GM, it sounds like the dealer is the problem. That's why I said go get a second opinion.

Posted

The dealer has done everything GM has told them to do. The feel of downshifting they couldn't duplicate as well as some other small things but over ask the dealer has been great. I've been in talks with GM about my state's lemon law because it was under repair 14 days past what the state says makes it a lemon but GM is bucking. I'll figure it out here soon.

Posted

There are some public roads in the US now where 85 MPH is the legal speed limit. There are definitely some in Texas, do not know about California.

 

I drove a Ford Escort in Montana years ago when there was no day time speed limit for passenger cars and trucks. I had the car going at 110 MPH for quite some time, but at that speed it had a tendency to hit the speed limiter. It did not downshift or anything like that, it just felt like it lost all power for a split second. Then the power resumed as the speed dropped to 108 MPH indicated or so. The car had H rated tires good for 130 MPH sustained speed, the law allowed that speed in daytime, the weather was good and the traffic was light. And yes, there were plenty of cars which passed me while driving close to 110 MPH.

Posted

I don't think it went to first gear at 85 mph. I think if it did the tires would have skidded - probably all four if you were in four wheel drive. I've had mine up to it's max governed speed of 100 mph a few times and it rides quiet and smooth, but it will down shift a gear or two if I punch it at 85 - and it does wind up the revs a lot, but not all the way to first gear. I think maybe the vette or the +$100,000 sports cars might hit 85 in first gear, but not a 2014 GM truck.

 

The dealer should get in and ride with you so you can point out each and every item before you let him out of the cab, otherwise they can just say you're mistaken or they can't fix it if it doesn't make that sound or vibration.

Posted

Is there a chance that you may have accidentally engaged the max-trailering option from the end of the shift lever?

 

I've done that a couple times. Very easy to do. RPM's will jump dramatically because computer thinks it's towing a load.

 

???

Posted

If it downshifted to first there would be a trail of parts on the side of the highway. Max speed in first is probably 20-30. If it somehow downshifted to first at 85 you'd destroy the engine and trans and possibly the rest of the drivetrain.

Posted

I agree. A downshift to 1st at 85 mph is catastrophic; I'd bet money you probably wouldn't be here to post this if it so happened.

Posted

I agree. A downshift to 1st at 85 mph is catastrophic; I'd bet money you probably wouldn't be here to post this if it so happened.

...but he is here, so we have to listen to it.

Posted

There are some public roads in the US now where 85 MPH is the legal speed limit. There are definitely some in Texas, do not know about California.

 

Yep, there's a nice long stretch of an 85mph one a few miles from my house that I find very useful to see what a vehicle can do and if its vibration free. :)

 

I've been on it cruising at 85-90mph, and have been passed by Texas Highway Patrol.

Posted

I would go with hitting the gov. Not so sure the trucks were designed with pursuit in mind. Maybe with the proper fed credentials, you can get that gov turned off.

Do you have the seats turned on for remote start? That can be turned on and off. Although... they don't get very warm. The elements are farther away from the seat surface because of the cooling option.

Posted

I believe the only full size SUV rated for pursuit is a 2WD Tahoe with the police package. This vehicle has lowered suspension, high speed capability tires, and no speed limiter. I.t is capable of about 140 MPH top speed according to test reports I saw. This with the 5.3 liter AFM engine and 3.08 rear end gears. The 4WD version of police Tahoe is not pursuit rated due to its higher ground clearance and less stability at high speeds.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...