Jump to content

Z71 vs standard shocks

texas18
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted

What makes them crappy or not?

 

I've got a Z71, and I love how it rides, so I would consider them an upgrade over the standard shocks.

Me too....my 16 & 16 Sierra all terrain has them & I have not one complaint
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Tek74
Tek74

I hear a lot of Rancho bashing, but nobody ever offers any specifics. What's so bad about Ranchos and what do Bilsteins offer over Ranchos?

Chris
Chris

The "Rancho" shock installed on the line is crap. Really no different from the normal shock except the color. But they are not the same quality you expect from Rancho when you buy the shocks from Summ

Tek74
Tek74

So the Z71 uses Rancho's "entry level" shock, which is crap, but Rancho also offers a high quality shock?

Posted Images

crushNchowda Senior Enthusiast

crushNchowda

Posted
Posted

Me too....my 16 & 16 Sierra all terrain has them & I have not one complaint

I had a '14 All terrain that got totaled, but had 40,000 miles at the time. I was planning on swapping out the rancho shocks on that truck to bilstein 5100s - I replaced it w/ a new '15 All terrain 1500 w/ the ranchos and I realized just how terrible these shocks really are. Sure, the brand new '15 on ranchos rides OK, but I immediately realized the ranchos on my '14 were toast and had been probably since 20-25,000 miles - bilsteins last MUCH longer, I have had them on my performance vehicles in the past.

Silverado-Hareek Senior Enthusiast

Silverado-Hareek

Posted
Posted (edited)

Those that say they love their Ranchos have never had Bilstiens. If you did, you wouldn't be saying you love the Ranchos at all and I truly believe that.

 

The stock Ranchos are junk. I'm pretty sure at 23,000 miles mine are completely shot. If they aren't, that's a testament to just how bad these shocks really are. The only reason I haven't swapped them for Bilstiens yet is because I've had other expenses take precedence in my budget this year.

 

It's tough to really put the difference into words....it's a feeling that's tough to describe. But in my attempt to describe it for you, Bilstiens seem to make the truck handle better, especially when taking corners, and they settle wheel hop better than any other shock I've ever experienced which gives you better traction and control of the vehicle. They also have a lifespan of like 100,000 miles before ever needing changing as opposed to most other brands of shocks which need replaement anywhere between 30,000 and 75,000 miles max.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
  • 6 months later...
Nick Useini Enthusiast

Nick Useini

Posted
Posted

A little off topic but does anyone know if the Bilsteins would work on a 15 suburban LTZ? Their isn't anything official from Bilsteins for the Ltz I don't think.. Just started researching tonight.

Andy Seibel Enthusiast

Andy Seibel

Posted
Posted

I've never thought about changing the shocks on my truck before, but reading this and other threads make me wonder...

 

Can someone tell me the cost you've paid for a shop to do the swap?

 

Also, I'm sure there's a huge difference if you are doing serious off road driving/ racing. But the only off-road I do is at very low speeds in farm lanes or while plowing snow. I'm used to feeling the bumps, its a truck after all. Could anyone provide feedback on the performance of the Bilsteins in this type of driving?

Bonker Enthusiast

Bonker

Posted
Posted

to all the guy's who have installed Billstiens, what is the preferred set up? 5100 adjustables for the front and 5100 regular for the rear or another choice for the rear.

 

Thanks in advance

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
txagbmw Enthusiast

txagbmw

Posted
Posted

Looking for the softest around town shock for my 14 all terrain. Occasionally need 4X but for most part in town

and on interstate. Had a 2002 Avalanche northface that was an extremely comfortable truck, don't know what

shocks they used on it. Been having issues with a loose feeling drivers seat, the suspension might be part of

the problem

ChrisTronyxYocum Enthusiast

ChrisTronyxYocum

Posted
Posted

to all the guy's who have installed Billstiens, what is the preferred set up? 5100 adjustables for the front and 5100 regular for the rear or another choice for the rear.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Also curious about this and whether or not parts for a 2015 will work on my 2016 because I cannot find any Bilstein products when I specify the 2016 model year.

kp52 Enthusiast

kp52

Posted
Posted

I went from a '15 Z71 4x4 CC with the rancho shocks to a '16 4x4 CC without Z71 and honestly I cant tell any difference ride-wise. Only thing I can feel is the Rancho/Z71 shocks used to bounce a few times when coming to a stop (like bad shocks) and the non ranchos dont. Could have been a bad shock or two with the Z71 truck, did it since it was new and kinda got used to it.

  • 3 weeks later...
2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

The OEM "Ranchos" are way too stiff. I replaced mine with real, aftermarket Rancho 5000's, and the ride quality is light years better.

Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted

Here's how the Z71 sits, it's not just emblems and decals, per the Chevy website:

LT Z71 features for 2016

"LT Z71 includes all LT features, with the addition or substitution of:

  • 18-inch bright machined aluminum wheels and All-terrain tires
  • Body-color headlamp bezels
  • Body-color grille surround
  • Chrome lower bumper appearance
  • Black Recovery Hooks
  • LED fog lamps
  • Z71 appearance package (Brushed metal Z71 door plate, unique gauge cluster and unique finish interior trim plates)
  • Heavy-duty locking rear differential
  • Hill Descent Control
  • Trailering Package
  • Underbody transfer case shield
  • Z71 Off-Road Suspension with twin Rancho monotube shocks "

The last item indicates that the Z71 uses a different off road suspension not just different shocks, and additional mechanical and electronic options over the equivalent LT or LTZ so how can someone say too soft or too stiff because apparently the shocks are balanced to the system. Ever consider that the Z71 ride with whatever shocks were put in is exactly the way it was designed to ride and it's a mistake is to put in a shock that provides a ride that is softer on your a$$ at the expense of degraded off road handling? Don't like the stiff ride with the aggressive tred tires? Then get the LT or LTZ version.

 

Painting anything white that is exposed on the undercarriage is an invitation to showing rust, but surface rust does not affect performance. Interesting that some people seem to care more about the poor paint job on the shocks where it doesn't matter than the crappy "Jello" clear coat finish and snot coating on the frames.

  • Like 1
ChrisTronyxYocum Enthusiast

ChrisTronyxYocum

Posted
Posted

Yes, they make it much more stiff. Some people don't like this and some do. I have been driving trucks my whole life and that is all I have ever owned and expect a truck to be a little stiff and it does not bother me but others it does. The rancho shocks are crap anyway, plan on changing over to bistien leveling shocks when my 3 year warranty is up.

 

Does swapping out the shocks void your warranty or risk the chance of coverage if something happens?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Sugar Bears 2015 GMC Terrain SLE-2 2.4 AWD

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...