Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone noticed that the hood on the 2016 Silverado 1500 pools water on the hood? I contacted Chevy. They suggested that I also contact local dealer who claims that no one else has mentioned this problem.

 

Posted

Depends on how level the ground is. I'll agree, it doesn't take much slope AT ALL for it to turn into a micro bus roof. Or a VW portable pool depending on your preference.

Posted

I guess it holds some water, until you drive away then it's gone...??

Posted

Lol, exactly why I called the new hoods bird baths when I saw them.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

Is it really that big of a deal that you get water on your hood? I had to chuckle when I read this.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Not the liquid water that concerns me. It's the flying ice chunks once the hood heats up. I notice the GMC terrain hoods hold a cup or two of water also if parked on a hill.

Posted

Not the liquid water that concerns me. It's the flying ice chunks once the hood heats up. I notice the GMC terrain hoods hold a cup or two of water also if parked on a hill.

 

Let the Lawsuits begin!

 

RT

Posted (edited)

Yeah, looks ok...good...whatever...to some, but kind of a goofy design. My driveway has a slight downward slope, and I like to back the truck into the driveway and might get a small amount of water that holds on. If I level the front end no doubt I'll have a bird bath.

 

Humph...

 

Edit in;;; Think I'll just drill a couple of drain holes in the hood. Good idea?

Edited by Willyone
Posted

Yeah, looks ok...good...whatever...to some, but kind of a goofy design. My driveway has a slight downward slope, and I like to back the truck into the driveway and might get a small amount of water that holds on. If I level the front end no doubt I'll have a bird bath.

 

Humph...

 

Edit in;;; Think I'll just drill a couple of drain holes in the hood. Good idea?

Good idea, did it on my camaro

 

52fc729765f12dc9491b4a33644adeb9.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I noticed this the first time it rained after I got it. Once you start to drive and hit the brakes it rolls off the front. I could see the ice being an issue, having a nice amount of ice built up on the hood, but not enough to be a problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hit mid 90's today. Even at the boarder of Canada and up by Duluth it was in the 90's. Going to be like this all week. Sure it's nothing like the south seeing 100's but they do say it's a different kind of heat here with all the lakes/water and humid days.
    • Pill flip on the transmission cooler lines is a 100% must do thing too.
    • It's a '21 and was a CPO with extended protection when purchased, so hopefully it will be covered.   I supposedly have all of it's service record history and nothing noted other than routine fluid changes, tire rotations, and the windshield washer nozzles replaced once. 
    • I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is:  First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees   That is WELL past 130ft.lbs per the TSB that you reference that does not apply to this scenario.     As for your clunk.  I'd say it needs to be diagnosed thoroughly.  Assuming the LCA hardware is tight, you could have a problem with the UCA, sway bar end links, etc.      
    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...