Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2015 6.0 w 4.10 read end. I pull a 7500lb travel trailer in the Oregon mountains with ease. This is a very strong powertrain.

Posted

I towed an Arctic Fox 22H (around 5800lbs) up and down the Oregon Mts and even into MT with relative ease with my 07 2500 with the 6.0L. The only time I had problems was with some poor gas on a hot day while towing. The problem it caused was the engine detuned itself to manage the ping. The resultant loss in power caused a very slow an arduous trip between the Tri Cities WA and Spokane. Like others have said, the engine loves to rev - I often climbed hills in 4th gear @ 3500-4000 RPM doing between 55 and 60. I could even accelerate and pass other rigs on hills.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Pretty sure all 2015 & up 2500's are 4.10

Edited by jt metal
  • Like 1
Posted

I towed an Arctic Fox 22H (around 5800lbs) up and down the Oregon Mts and even into MT with relative ease with my 07 2500 with the 6.0L. The only time I had problems was with some poor gas on a hot day while towing. The problem it caused was the engine detuned itself to manage the ping. The resultant loss in power caused a very slow an arduous trip between the Tri Cities WA and Spokane. Like others have said, the engine loves to rev - I often climbed hills in 4th gear @ 3500-4000 RPM doing between 55 and 60. I could even accelerate and pass other rigs on hills.

Not to derail thread but how's the 17 L5P Duramax? Anything you miss vs the 6.0?

Posted

Not to derail thread but how's the 17 L5P Duramax? Anything you miss vs the 6.0?

Just completed my first tow with it and the only thing I miss is...........

 

 

 

Nothing - the Dmax pulls like a mother, the exhaust brake retards on the downhill and the MPG is great - I am now towing close to 8000 lbs in the form of a new 31' TT Pulled the coast range this weekend set the cruise at 60 and it held that speed uphill in 5th gear and downhill with the EB and an occasional down shift to 4th. The revs hardly ever went above 2000. Ave MPG for the trip was 11.8 and the truck has less than 1000mi.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah,something isn't computing. Either yor expecting to much,like a magic carpet ride while towing, or something might just be wrong with the truck. That trailer loaded to the gills shouldn't make the truck feel that underpowered. My 2016 regular cab has pulled 8k lb trailer with no problem, sure it was there, but keeping up with traffic wasn't an issue.

Posted (edited)

Sounds like the trailer brakes are stuck or dragging some... Can you take the wheels off the trailer and see if anything is wrong or even borrow another trailer to see if any different?

 

The dealer can help if codes have popped up...what grade of gas are you using or brand? Bad gas is around so it may be just that.

 

Sierra Boy

Edited by Sierra Boy
  • Like 1
Posted

It was mentioned about the gear ratio. Even 3.73 is a big jump from 4.10.

The take off power would definitely be noticeable.

Check the mfg code numbers. If i recall correctly, GT4 would be 3.73, GT5 would be 4.10. Dealer could decide it for you also.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Posted

Wow my 03 Dodge 2500 5.7 pulled like crap. Always hunting for gears revving high to maintain speed on hills. this was pulling a toy hauler max GVW of 7500lbs. Bought a 1500 GMC 5.3 and it pulled so much better, The only thing the Dodge had over the GMC was weight. It just handled the trailer better but that was to be expected as the Dodge weighed a lot more. Now I have a 2016 2500 6.0 and I haven't towed the toy hauler with it yet but I am sure it will pull better than the Dodge did.

Posted (edited)

Even if he did have 3.73 gears they wouldnt make that much of a differance pulling that light trailer and if the trailer brakes were dragging they would be smoking hot. Try disconnecting the trailer brakes to take that out of the question. Hell pulling that trailer is like a great dane playing tug-o-war with a hamster to the truck.

 

Who knows the brake controller might be working backwards in the computer, applying the brakes on the trailer when the gas is pressed I've seen strange things happen in computers.

Edited by Silverado4x4
Posted

7000lbs of trailer and old 51 Ferguson tractor. Pulled it excellent. Tow Haul on and I never saw the floor or even 5/8 throttle unless I wanted to.

Posted

Just to reiterate what others have said, these trucks pull great. I pulled my travel trailer to Yellowstone last summer, around 7,500 pounds loaded + truck full of gear and family, and pulled through the mountains just fine. Only 1 time I could not maintain the speed limit.

Posted

The OP is kind of right, Dodge does not use much torque management on the hemi vs the GM 6.0 with tons of torque management and a tight torque converter that stays locked.

 

A tuned 6.0 will feel like a Hemi, the stock Hemi vs a stock 6.0, the 6.0 will out pull it all day, the Hemi sounds mean and feels mean but the 6.0 gets it done.

 

Use the throttle more aggressively in your truck and rest assured you bought the best HD truck on the market.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...