Jump to content

2018 OEM LED Tail Light Swap

IncisionInd
 Share

Recommended Posts

IncisionInd Enthusiast

IncisionInd

Posted
Posted

This last weekend I went ahead with putting in the OEM LED tail lights from the LTZ model on my new 2018 Silverado LT.  Overall the installation was successfull and fairly easy to do. The tail lights that I have had the stock GM harnesses still attached and I ordered a tail light harness (with resistors for hyperflash) from PGamboa.  BTW if you are planning on doing this mod I would HIGHLY suggest the kit from @pgamboa.  The kit was shipped quickly, was made with quality and I have never met a person that was willing to answer so many stupid questions from me :).

 

I would say that the most difficult parts of the entire process was picking a good place to mount the resistors, and doing the actual routing of the stock wire harness.  The cables from the tails are actually threaded down behind the lights and down to almost the middle of the truck near the spare tire to an electrical hook up.  If I could give anyone advice on this it would be to drop the spare and move it out ahead of time, makes clipping the cables in way easier.  So onto the picks:

Before the project:

IMG_7363.thumb.JPG.858d338407af1f9abaf56681e50052e0.JPG

 

Where I decided to mount the resistors.  This is on the drivers side and it is close to where the other cables run down.  The cables were eventually routed in that opening to the left and continued through the stock channels:

IMG_7484.thumb.JPG.15d63847535187824acd457e74719aba.JPG

 

Close up off the resistor location:

IMG_7479.thumb.JPG.6ddc347394960e6345633937e319061d.JPG

 

Afterwards, lit up at night:

IMG_7485.thumb.JPG.213bfb641483ecbe8117cd027ea296e0.JPG

 

and with the reverse lights on:

IMG_7487.thumb.JPG.2d9f265cf59ab7e19fdbf588eab3a21b.JPG

 

I know that some people say that they are too expensive, however I just think that they look better than most of the aftermarket tail lights that are out there.  Also yes I am planning on adding White LED Reverse lights and LED License plate bulbs.  If you have any questions about the process I would be happy to try and answer them. 

  • Like 2
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

IncisionInd
IncisionInd

This last weekend I went ahead with putting in the OEM LED tail lights from the LTZ model on my new 2018 Silverado LT.  Overall the installation was successfull and fairly easy to do. The tail lights

pgamboa
pgamboa

Reverse bulbs to LED do not require resistors. Only turn signals if you upgrade the bulbs to LEDs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Totman504
Totman504

Thanks man, I appreciate it. I’ll contact them both to see what’s up.

Posted Images

DougFL Enthusiast

DougFL

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, J_Mas6.2 said:

Are the reverse lights in them not LED?


Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

No they are Incandescent bulbs!  The 2019 has the same incandescent back-up bulbs!

Nasty Senior Enthusiast

Nasty

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, DougFL said:

No they are Incandescent bulbs!  The 2019 has the same incandescent back-up bulbs!

I replaced mine with led, much better. No point in having led taillights and keeping the same crappy reverse bulb

DougFL Enthusiast

DougFL

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nasty said:

I replaced mine with led, much better. No point in having led taillights and keeping the same crappy reverse bulb

I concur and also replaced mine.

t76turbo Enthusiast

t76turbo

Posted
Posted

What year will these 18 led taillights fit back through?  (if anyone knows off the top of the head)

 

They  look very good.  Did the same kind of swap on a truck I just sold.  Like the LED tails very much.

 

  • Like 1
SirenRed16 Senior Enthusiast

SirenRed16

Posted
Posted
What year will these 18 led taillights fit back through?  (if anyone knows off the top of the head)
 
They  look very good.  Did the same kind of swap on a truck I just sold.  Like the LED tails very much.
 
My guess would be 14-18 Silverado

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
IncisionInd Enthusiast

IncisionInd

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/5/2018 at 11:19 AM, J_Mas6.2 said:

Are the reverse lights in them not LED?

No they are incandescent, which I will be honest was a shock to me.  I thought when I bought them the whole thing would be LED.

On 10/5/2018 at 12:50 PM, DougFL said:

No they are Incandescent bulbs!  The 2019 has the same incandescent back-up bulbs!

Come on GM / Chevy!  Spring a couple extra bucks for some LED Bulbs, its not like they don't make enough off the tail light upgrade... 

On 10/5/2018 at 1:40 PM, Nasty said:

I replaced mine with led, much better. No point in having led taillights and keeping the same crappy reverse bulb

Completely Agree!  If you don't mind me asking what company did you go with for the LED?

On 10/5/2018 at 1:42 PM, DougFL said:

I concur and also replaced mine.

 If you don't mind me asking what company did you go with for the LED?

IncisionInd Enthusiast

IncisionInd

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/8/2018 at 12:15 AM, Afgixxer said:

How much were the taillights? Looks very clean

I found this set on eBay for $550.  Like I said I know that they are more expensive than some of the 3rd party options, however I would say that they just look clean and the fit and finish on them is awesome.

Seapacer2 Enthusiast

Seapacer2

Posted
Posted

I like the look of your upgraded tail lamps, you are right, GM should have upgrades to LED's for the rear. 

 

I was looking at just adding Reverse bulbs,  they are really that bright when utilized while backing up.    Will I need to use the PGamboa wiring harness for just the reverse lamps?

 

 

  • Like 1
pgamboa Senior Enthusiast

pgamboa

Posted
Posted
I like the look of your upgraded tail lamps, you are right, GM should have upgrades to LED's for the rear. 
 
I was looking at just adding Reverse bulbs,  they are really that bright when utilized while backing up.    Will I need to use the PGamboa wiring harness for just the reverse lamps?
 
 

Reverse bulbs to LED do not require resistors. Only turn signals if you upgrade the bulbs to LEDs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Olby85 New Member

Olby85

Posted
Posted

I just bought a LTZ Midnight Edition and I want to get a set of black led tail lights. They are not compatible with the stock LEDs that come on the LTZs. Is there a way to convert the stock LED harness to the incandescent harness so I can get the tail lights I want? TIA!

14 Silvy Enthusiast

14 Silvy

Posted
Posted
I just bought a LTZ Midnight Edition and I want to get a set of black led tail lights. They are not compatible with the stock LEDs that come on the LTZs. Is there a way to convert the stock LED harness to the incandescent harness so I can get the tail lights I want? TIA!


I would trade you tail lights and harnesses lol I have a 18 lt I just bought 3 weeks ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...