Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, seniorjumper82 said:

Mines not leaking yet that I’ve seen but I did find a crack in the window frame yesterday?  Will GM replace it just due to a cracked window frame?


Pssshhhh no. They don’t even replace them when they are cracked and leaking.

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
Posted

Finally took mine in to get leak fixed.  Mine was only a small leak and didn’t do it all the time.  They did the TSB caulking work and did a neat job, no globs, smears or scratches.  I spoke to service mgr and they looked but found no cracks in frame.   He said  The  spoiler was not sealed correctly and was leaking.  So far it is dry after testing at home.  Time will tell if it works.

  • Like 2
Posted

Picked up my truck last night.  Everything looks good, body shop did a great job, and believe me I inspected it... They said they replaced the rear window but also discovered a leak in the front A-pillar where the sunroof drain wasn’t properly connected. Also noticed the carpet and padding was wet so they replaced that and all the carpeting. I guess I should say thank you that they actually took the time to inspect everything and replace what needed to be but REALLY.... Why do we spend $60k and buy brand new trucks? It’s supposed to rain for the next couple days so I guess we’ll see. Fingers crossed...  Btw, the service rep was very apologetic and felt really bad, even though none of it was HIS fault. Nonetheless he gave me the next 4 oil change/tire rotations for free. A nice gesture...

  • Like 4
Posted

Good News!  Glad to see they took care of you and your vehicle.  Interesting about the sunroof, as now that is another thing to check.  
Here’s hoping it stays fixed 

Posted

For those of you having good luck with your dealers, would you mind posting what dealership you had your work done at? I think it would be helpful for anyone who comes along and lives by one of those to save some time and headache.

I wish I would have had a satisfactory experience in all of this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Bridgewater Chevrolet in Bridgewater NJ tried the caulk repair once, did a decent job but didn't work, they called GM and got a new window approved for 2nd. appointment, window replaced and no leaks since. They sent it out to a glass shop to replace the window as a FYI.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ingersoll Auto of Danbury CT.  Salesman was Dave B.  And service was Don.  Great place and great guys.   Would HIGHLY recommend.  
 

Oh yeah, they changed my mirror caps from the chrome to the black (I had asked about in one of the other posts) much better now...?

Edited by VinnieM
Posted

I had my first repair (caulk as per TSB) done at Bennett Chevrolet in Egg Harbor Township NJ.  They did a good job and returned truck detailed.   It was just done Monday And it is good so far, but time will tell.

Posted
1 hour ago, VinnieM said:

Ingersoll Auto of Danbury CT.  Salesman was Dave B.  And service was Don.  Great place and great guys.   Would HIGHLY recommend.  
 

Oh yeah, they changed my mirror caps from the chrome to the black (I had asked about in one of the other posts) much better now...?

Great to know! This is where I bring my truck even though I bought it at Ingersol in Watertown... I work in Danbury so it convenient 

Posted

Had my rear window leak fixed at the dealership I bought my truck from.... Huffines Chevrolet Plano, Texas

 

Still having no leak issues yet with the new fix

 

 

Posted

I posted about a week or so ago that I didn’t have time to read all the pages of this thread.  While I still haven’t read them all I have been through about 50 of them and that’s enough.  

 

I am having second thoughts about buying one of these trucks.  All the dealers near me are in lockdown so I have time to think about it.   The idea of spending this much money for something with a known problem like this seems like a bad idea.

 

 I don’t drive in the rain much and the truck would be kept in a garage.  I am handy and wouldn’t have any trouble doing the Permatex fix, so I may wind up pulling the trigger.   I have looked at all the trucks out there and like the Denali the best.  I have mixed emotions about finding this thread.  

 

Posted
I posted about a week or so ago that I didn’t have time to read all the pages of this thread.  While I still haven’t read them all I have been through about 50 of them and that’s enough.  
 
I am having second thoughts about buying one of these trucks.  All the dealers near me are in lockdown so I have time to think about it.   The idea of spending this much money for something with a known problem like this seems like a bad idea.
 
 I don’t drive in the rain much and the truck would be kept in a garage.  I am handy and wouldn’t have any trouble doing the Permatex fix, so I may wind up pulling the trigger.   I have looked at all the trucks out there and like the Denali the best.  I have mixed emotions about finding this thread.  
 

Not to deter you as I’m sure many people are happy with their trucks, but my Denali is the worst vehicle I have ever owned. Transmission promblems, leaking rear window, and every interior panel rattles already with only 1300 miles on it. The fit and finish and overalll build quality is horrible imo. Hoping I can get the issues sorted out but if not will be getting something else in the near future.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Had  my 19 Denali window caulked at Goldstein GMC Albany NY back in early December. They did a very neat job. No goop anywhere, no stains, no scratches. Could not even tell they did anything except the sealant smell that faded after a couple weeks. Many heavy rains and carwashes since then and no leaks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...