Jump to content

1500 MPG highway


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/17/2019 at 6:47 PM, NomadicCPO said:

5.3 CC, 8-speed with 3.42 gears.  Around town in winter ~16mpg, summer ~18mpg.  Highway at 70 ~21-23.  Best ever over a tank was 25mpg...and yes it was on country backroads doing 55mph.

Exact same combo for engine/trans I get exactly same results!  I have 90K and lifetime is 19.5mppg's

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I religiously drive via my cruise control, set it every time that I'm doing at least 24MPH, and use it to speed up & slow down for speed zone changes.  I very rarely (next to never) go over 65.  Trip B 0n my truck says that I've gotten 18.8 MPGs since I bought it.  Fuelly says otherwise, see signature block, it will be updated later tonight on my way home.  My only dislike with Fuelly is having to estimate how much city vs highway driving I've done, that should automatically show in my AVG. Was running on 87, until May, but have since moved up to 91, and have seen a small increase.

Posted

One thing that I didnt see mentioned when discussing mpg was how many are using 10% ethanol gas and how many are using pure gas. That too will make a difference on results.

 

Posted

2015 Denali 6.2, 8speed, 20inch tires and 3.42. Lifted 2.5"

Average over 7K miles is 18.9. That's what I've put on the truck since I purchased her in March.

That includes city, highway normal driving and towing 4200lb sailboat and/or 6500lb travel trailer part of the time.

She gets about 3mpg's more than my older Yukon XL SLT with 5.3 and max tow.

I'm happy.

20190409_192542.jpg

Posted
29 minutes ago, videoarizona said:

2015 Denali 6.2, 8speed, 20inch tires and 3.42. Lifted 2.5"

Average over 7K miles is 18.9. That's what I've put on the truck since I purchased her in March.

That includes city, highway normal driving and towing 4200lb sailboat and/or 6500lb travel trailer part of the time.

She gets about 3mpg's more than my older Yukon XL SLT with 5.3 and max tow.

I'm happy.

20190409_192542.jpg

Nice setup! What’s your towing mpg?

Posted
On ‎7‎/‎17‎/‎2019 at 8:36 PM, Flinthills said:

It is fun when the instant readings say I get 13 going up a small hill and 75 going back down. Then the numbers are just a form of entertainment

Can be a tool as well. Coupled with an altimeter and my weather app and speedometer I've found my peak efficiency numbers for various speeds. Do that enough times and  you can make minor adjustments in driving that make large impacts in efficiency. In my area there are many ways to the same place and each one the truck responds to differently. Traffic patterns set by time of day and the list goes on. WAZE for other. Then once you've trained the brain and right foot....it becomes entertainment. Entertainment that pays you to play. 

Posted
12 hours ago, 2018GMC said:

Nice setup! What’s your towing mpg?

8 to 10 mpg's at 65mph towing the trailer. 10-12mpg's towing the boat. Boat has far less windage as it sits low on the trailer.

20161117_171336.jpg

Posted

Since I added the Diablo canned 87 tune I am not getting 20-23 consistently on the highway doing 70mph.  Before it was 18-20.  I highly recommend that tune.  It shift so much better.   Also have an AEM direct flow tube on my air intake.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

i have a 2018 sierra 1500 crew cab with the 5.3

 

i have 9300ish miles on it right now and since i bought the truck new, i have never reset the trip b 

 

according to that i have average 19 miles per gallon since i bought the truck. 

 

my drive to work is 15 miles 1 way. 

 

the best i got over a 25 mile according to the truck was 28.5 mpg 

Posted

Currently about to leave the OBX and go back to NY... on the way down, computer said 16.7 mpg by the time I filled up in DE.  That was on E85 (my worst ever on E85), and I filled up with a quarter tank left with 87 (my first time putting 87 in the truck!).  Since then, the computer was showed 22.4 until I got to the Banks (cruising at 62 mph, occasional traffic light).  Once here, there's been only 45 mph and under speeds, lots of traffic, lights, and even about 10 miles on the beach in 4-hi and 4-lo, and the computer is showing 18.3.  I didn't hand calculate these, as the computer has shown to be within .5 mpg of my hand calculations every time.  The truck isn't heavily packed, but the tonneau cover is rolled up with a couple of bikes laying sideways on top of my gear in the bed, so that does disrupt the airflow.  The truck is all stock right down to it 17" factory wheels (which I hate).

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Over the past few weeks I have made changes to my driving habits that have added about 2-3 GPM.  I started to use the time to determine red/green light time periods since I run the same 15 mile path that has about 20 lights.  Learning when to lay off the accelerator and when I need to bump it up to get through a light has reduced my idle at a stop time.  I have toned down my speeds that I used to hustle in the left lane and now do the limit in the right lane.  

Before I was getting about 17 GPM and now I'm around 20.  Better mileage less stress, safer driving and I often catch up to folks that passed me when I get to the next stop.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...