Jump to content

Borla Type-S installed - AT4 6.2 - Video/sound included


Recommended Posts

Posted

Installed the borla type-s exhaust couple days ago.  
 

build quality is excellent, fitment was absolutely spot on.  
 

took me 5 beers and about 2 hours...

 

my thoughts.. on the system...  also have a type S on my SRT...

 

1.  Cold start is aggressive!  It literally barks....  I was very surprised by this,  much louder than my SRT system...

 

2.  After engine warms up and rpms settle down it has the very standard s-type deep burble at idle.   If the truck is parked and just running, walking behind it is just music to my ears.  Very deep little burble that just sounds great.

 

3.  As you ramp up the rpms and roll through the gears, the sound is deep and pronounced, this is the loudest type-s exhaust I’ve heard.  Not in a bad way, just know that you will hear this exhaust unless you absolutely butter the throttle and accelerate like an old woman.
 

4. No drone in 9th or 10th gear.. no goofy noises or vibrations with cylinder deactivation stuff so that’s a major plus.

 

conclusion

happy with the purchase, louder than expected but still nothing too crazy.  Getting the ATAK version would be overboard for a pickup in my opinion... 

 

engineers at borla said their touring style is identical to the gmc branded perf exhaust in regards to sound output.


so their 3 levels are

 

touring- tame 

type-s - pretty big jump, aggressive! Crazy cold start that barks

atak- crazy man over the top sound, I don’t think many guys would go this extreme

 

will get better videos soon

Posted

I installed the s type last night on my 5.3. I agree with everything you said. It is the most aggressive s type I have heard on a truck and it sounds really good. Absolute ZERO drone. Its astonishing actually, even when DFM is active there is no resonance in the cabin. Definitely loud under throttle and very nice to cruise with. I would buy this again if I had the choice. Hardest part of install was removing the old exhaust. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Anyone ever heard the difference between touring and S type in person?  Curious how big a jump the cold starts are. I'm getting ready to pull the trigger and decided Borla already  but worried about the cold starts since I'm in a townhouse and our garage is literally feet away from next door neighbors bedroom.  For that reason thinking touring may be the best bet.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/23/2019 at 11:43 AM, reardiff said:

Anyone ever heard the difference between touring and S type in person?  Curious how big a jump the cold starts are. I'm getting ready to pull the trigger and decided Borla already  but worried about the cold starts since I'm in a townhouse and our garage is literally feet away from next door neighbors bedroom.  For that reason thinking touring may be the best bet.

I had the Touring on my 2018 6.2L and I really liked it. I was going to get the S type, however for reasons similar to yours, I went with Touring because I was worried about how it might sound in my neighborhood. Check out this this video to the OP's for a comparison. For my 2019, I'm leaning towards the S type because I wanted that little bit more than I had with the Touring.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Those  headrest speakers look fun! Standard panoramic roof on the AT4X might be a deal breaker for me unless I can delete it. Maybe I should just supercharge my truck and call it a day. We'll see what I think of all the new trucks when I see them in person. 
    • "Increase"?   You want to "increase" your turning radius?     What is your truck?  What kind of cab and bed do you have currently?  Is it stock?  Modified?  Lifted?  
    • OP's quote is parts and labor.  Not just parts.     The # you found isn't the right one.  But besides that, the right # is the same price within a couple bucks.  $5802.01.    Now, factor in labor and fluids.  Book time is 17.1 hours for a Colorado 8 speed.  At $200/hr for a dealer average rate, its $3420 just in labor.  We are already at $9222.  Fluid and other necessary items, there's your $400-500 more.      Also.  Your "discounted" transmission.  Which is 99% likely quoted off of GM Parts Direct as that's the MSRP I found on their site.    You failed to note the $597 in shipping charges.  So we are right back almost to MSRP.  $5794.  Oh.  AND, you better have the $4000 for the core charge which you'd have to pay and get refunded, AND you gotta pay to SHIP THE CORE BACK.    So now you'd have paid MORE to buy that one online yourself, even after you get your core refunded.  
    • I would like to know if I can increase my 2025 Silverado 2500 HD
    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...