Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/4/2022 at 10:41 PM, Janko Sakuzov said:

Just did a full suspension install. 

5100 on the front set to 2" 

1" Motofab spacers under the 5100s for total 3" front lift.

Motofab UCAs 

5160 in the back with Motofab extensions

Motofab 2" blocks on the back

Firestone Rite Ride airbags were already installed on there. Might need spacers for them 

2" Bora wheel spacers all around for a little wider track.

As it sits right now there's about 3/8" -1/2" rake still but I'm ok with it. I could still raise the 5100 one more notch to bring them up another 1/2" to make it 100% level, or take out the front motofab spacers and raise the 5100 the other 1/2" to be back where I'm at right now. Probably won't touch them though.

Ride is spot on now, but the real test comes in a couple of weeks when we take the 30' camper out. Main reason for all the work was to hopefully smooth out the front bouncing on the concrete highways around here when we tow. I have the weight distribution hitch spot on to spread the load 50%-50% . The Airbags in the back helped a TON with that, but the front was a complete ****** show. On some stretches it's so bad we stopped camping on the west side of the state to avoid those highways. F073CB74-6CA6-4139-8DF1-6B1F3F0DDFAA.thumb.JPG.a7c1a62bbfc241352c1a36e134480b6d.JPGF5C6474E-E4CB-4FC5-9650-DFE7357592AC.thumb.JPG.a3bc790b41c42bec3a2ba151a2c7f975.JPG

 


 

Any updates on this setup???!

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/10/2022 at 3:26 PM, Amcguy1970 said:

One thing I do not get is the comments on how "smooth" these shocks ride, that isn't at all what they do or are known for. They actually do the opposite on rough broken pavement with any kind of added lift from the shock. I have these, they are an improvement, especially on the large bumps, but they actually ride a little rougher on the small stuff. Just want to make sure people who read some of the rose colored glasses reviews what they are really in for. Steer clear of reviews that mention night and day, huge difference or boast how smooth the ride is. The larger you lift you add with them the stiffer they get as they pre-load the spring to attain lift. 

 

Overall they are a fantastic upgrade if that is what you are wanting (to control the large bump pogo effect and side to movements) but if smooth ride over broken pavement is it, then that is not the case. Now if you go large with the tires and stay in a P rated size and someone goes from a 20" to an 18" wheel and they boast smooth ride, then that will be attributed to the tires, not the shocks and lift combo. 

 

Again, very happy with mine (though the stock ranchos weren't bad by any means) but some of the reviews on these are just far out, same goes with some tires...

 

I will also be looking at the eibach's next time as I have heard some good things about those. 

 

Tyler

Agree with the above. I did not like the 5100's ride over small bumps and even some larger higher speed hits. This is with the 5100's only on the rear. Did not bother mounting the fronts. Switched to rear Rancho RS9000 with damping set on #3 position. Supple ride, good comp and rebound plus I can feel the weight transfer due to better suspension response/articulation. 5100's felt numb. My Silverado is a bare bones 2020 WT DC 2WD with 265/65/18 Conti A/T's on TB Reps. Stock height. The 5100's are probably better suited for hard working lifted trucks with larger wheel packages.  

 

Posted (edited)

Bilstein 5100's front and rear (trailboss part number)

 

24-309509

24-309516

Rough Country UCA for 3" lift

Motofab rear 2" block with U-bolts

 

+2.5" in the front

+2.0" in the rear

 

I know the pic shows otherwise, but I put the front strut circlips set to the middle position for .55" of lift.  Wanted to maintain a touch of forward rake, and with the extra weight of the diesel it worked out perfect.  

 

This is the 3rd set of 5100's I have purchased (jeep life) so I knew what to expect.  No, the ride is not smoother or a night and day difference.  In fact it is a little firmer.  But there is more steering response, and way less rebounding that happens over speed bumps or highway bridge sections.  I also noticed much less side-to-side rocking that happens when I pull into the parking lot at work, which is a fairly steep diagonal transition that flexes out the suspension.  Overall, a great purchase.

 

My other vehicle is a 2004 WJ Grand Cherokee, and it is really nice working on a brand new truck where nothing is rusted or stuck!

 

342886583_IMG_4124MEDIUM.thumb.JPG.f588c6f7a9aea92c206991312027d898.JPG150917892_IMG_4116MEDIUM.thumb.JPG.a17095cbe83a7d923dbd78e628ae2c38.JPG7EF4A669-6539-4941-B704-530A3291B08B.thumb.jpeg.d21ef825dd92c5737eda99d5465ec73a.jpegFA99D60C-DB8A-49AB-8D45-C3E44D48F82B.thumb.jpeg.d45f5ed546a0021705fb5acb558480a5.jpeg

Edited by mdrum93
  • Like 2
Posted

My 2022 LTD custom feels like a boat going down the road...I think Bilstein 5100's are in my near future. I just installed a set on my 2019 GMC Canyon and its night and day!

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

I have a question about the CV axles. If you use the Billsteins to lift the front 2" or 2.5" will you have problems with the CV axles? I see the GM factory 2" kit comes with new CV axles, I assume they are longer than stock axles? 

Edited by Diamond817
Posted

Yes they use different axles. 
 

Mine is “so far, so good” with 2” of lift and the stock axles. They ever fail and I’ll buy Trailboss spec CV shafts. 

Posted
On 12/8/2022 at 9:39 PM, AJMBLAZER said:

Yes they use different axles. 
 

Mine is “so far, so good” with 2” of lift and the stock axles. They ever fail and I’ll buy Trailboss spec CV shafts. 

Ok, good. I've decided to go this route instead of with the 2" GM kit. I really didn't want to lift the rear of the truck 2", so I'm going to do a 1" rear lift and a 1.5" or 2" front lift.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pnw_obrigade said:

Has anybody used the Motofab AT4 1.5" preload spacer on 5100's to get more lift than 1.1" on the 3.0 Duramax (assuming the Bilsteins are set in the stock position)?


There’s a dude earlier in the thread that did Bilstein to 2” and added a 1” bottom strut lift. I tried messaging him to see how it’s holding up, but no response.


As of now, I have mine set to 2” and I’m going to add a bottom 1.5” (Supreme Suspension) with some Rough Country UCAs and a differential drop spacer kit.

 

In the rear I have Rough Country air springs, and a 1” block.

 

Once it’s all completed I should have 3-3.5” Front and 1.5” Rear… (Bilsteins have already settled half an inch and Air Spring kit added an additional .5”)
 

I’ll keep y’all updated, but I don’t plan to finish it up for a few months. Between the UCAs and differential spacers I think it’s going to ride pretty well considering the shock upgrade.

Posted

I’m quite astonished when I read some of these threads about shocks and brakes on these trucks. I never changed shocks or brakes for the time I owned my trucks. My trucks usually had tool boxes and fuel tanks. I put a lot of Hwy miles on. They spent lots of time on pipelines. The only thing I can figure is they changed a lot since my last new one 2014. Or people are awful picky. I spent my money on performance upgrades. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’m quite astonished when I read some of these threads about shocks and brakes on these trucks. I never changed shocks or brakes for the time I owned my trucks. My trucks usually had tool boxes and fuel tanks. I put a lot of Hwy miles on. They spent lots of time on pipelines. The only thing I can figure is they changed a lot since my last new one 2014. Or people are awful picky. I spent my money on performance upgrades. 

You’re missing out 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Mike Borowski said:

You’re missing out 

I always owned a mixture of vehicles. Sports cars, luxury cars performance trucks. If something was amiss I would have noticed. I’ve had Z71s and FX4s. If they’ve gotten bad since my last one, shame on GM. 

Posted
15 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I always owned a mixture of vehicles. Sports cars, luxury cars performance trucks. If something was amiss I would have noticed. I’ve had Z71s and FX4s. If they’ve gotten bad since my last one, shame on GM. 

LOLZ at all the peeps trolled by this thread that was probably started by a Bilstein distributor...

 

"My truck handles like a '72 Eldorado!"

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

Posted
33 minutes ago, It's Tim said:

LOLZ at all the peeps trolled by this thread that was probably started by a Bilstein distributor...

 

"My truck handles like a '72 Eldorado!"

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

I owned a 73, my father bought it new gave it to my grandfather. I bought it from him. I owned 13 Impala’s a few olds, Buicks and Pontiacs. In contrast my wife favors sports cars. Even two fieros, a couple Camaros, two mustangs among others. I know the difference between a good ride and bad. I put money into performance, engine that is. I can see different shocks being an upgrade. Not enough that I’ll go screaming to pull off the stock ones that are new. Now a two barrel on a V-8 or quite exhaust. When I was younger they were changed the first thing.

Posted
48 minutes ago, It's Tim said:

LOLZ at all the peeps trolled by this thread that was probably started by a Bilstein distributor...

 

"My truck handles like a '72 Eldorado!"

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

Speaking of trolls...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...