Jump to content

Live Review: 2015 Chevrolet Colorado - Part Three


Recommended Posts

Posted

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_72.jpg

 

Words & Photos by: Zane Merva & Josh Merva
Editors, GM-Trucks.com
10/31/2014

Welcome to the third and final part of our week long 2015 Chevrolet Colorado Live Review. We hope you've enjoyed the photos and impressions we've shared so far. Today we will share our impressions about how well the 2015 Colorado drives, how well it tows, what fuel economy the 3.6L engine can get, and if we could live with it on a daily basis.

 

If you have not read our previous two parts to this Live Review, consider giving them a look!

 

Part One: Introduction to our review and this 2015 Chevy Colorado

Part Two: A look at the interior options, features, and comfort in the 2015 Colorado Crew cab

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_09.jpg

Our Colorado came equipped with the larger and more powerful 3.6L V6 engine. It is rated at 305-horsepower and 269 lb-ft of torque. This is the same engine you'll find in the Equinox and Camaro, although the tuning has been altered to move to the torque curve lower in the RPM range. This 3.6L has a good punch of low end torque, which is much needed for a truck.

 

2015_Colorado_Canyon28.jpg

The optional 2.5L I4 engine that we experienced during our First Drive review isn't as peppy as the V6 but offers an economical option for someone who won't tow or haul very much. The inline four-cylinder produces 200-horsepower and 191 lb-ft of torque. While it doesn't sound like a lot, this nearly matches the output of a late 90's 4.3L V6!

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_62.jpg

Chevy claims the mid-size Colorado can do much of what a full-size Silverado can. So we hooked up a trailer and gave this pickup a small workout. With a light 1,000lb load, we barely knew the trailer was behind us. Because of its smaller size, tight maneuvers and backing up with a trailer are easier than with a full-size.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_07.jpg

Our Colorado came with the "Trailering Equipment Package." Chevy includes an integrated hitch receiver and a 4-pin/7-pin electrical connection. For the price of $250, it seems well worth it.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_05.jpg

These side mirrors are sleek and low on wind noise but not so great for towing. They don't extend far enough to give a great view of what's behind you while pulling a large trailer. However, for every day use, we've got no complaints and appreciate the blind spot areas.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_70.jpg

Colorado's four-wheel Duralife disc-brakes make a noticeable difference. Our 2011 Sierra's brakes don't feel nearly as responsive and solid as this.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_65.jpg

During our week of driving we saw a wide range of fuel economy, depending on what we were doing. In the city and while towing we averaged around 18 miles to the gallon. On the highway and lonely urban roads we able to achieve nearly 28 miles to the gallon!

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_12.jpg

Our 4X4 Colorado was at home off the beaten path. With a minimum of 8.1-inches of ground clearance, this pickup will take you deep down the local trail but probably won't do well crawling rocks. We would imagine the Colorado would do well in the snow.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_63.jpg

This truck also does well in urban and city roads. A tight turning radius and smaller footprint give the Colorado a leg up over the less maneuverable full-size Silverado. Parking, tight corners, and narrow roads are all much less stressful.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_67.jpg

With a comfortable, almost crossover like ride, we wouldn't think twice about using the Colorado as a daily driver and a weekend warrior. The communicative steering impressed us. Chevy engineers tuned the Colorado to drive with a level of responsiveness we're not used to in a truck. The rear end never felt light and we were never bounced around.

 

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_71.jpg

The 4X4 system in the Colorado is has three options- 2WD, 4WD High and 4WD Low. It engaged cleanly, smoothly, and didn't change the way the Colorado drove. Even in two-wheel-drive, the Colorado's traction control handled more than we expected and engaged smoothly.

 

Final Thoughts

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_73.jpg

Every day we drove the 2015 Colorado we grew to love it even more. A slightly smaller pickup that has nearly all the capacity of a full-size is an idea waiting to be executed well for a long time. Chevy has done it with the mid-size Colorado.

 

Our time with this long wheel base crew cab excited us even more about the future prospects of a Duramax Diesel as an available engine next year. GM's 8-speed transmission will also likely end up in the Colorado sooner or later.

 

While the Colorado offers nearly all of the size and capability of the Silverado, that means it also comes at nearly all of the price. Our well optioned example came at a stiff $38,870. For nearly $40,000 we wish some aspects of the Colorado, such as the hard plastic dash, were made to feel more premium. On the other hand, we were impressed at how well the Colorado drove and handled. If you are in the market for a truck but don't plan on loading it to capacity every time you leave the house, you might be surprised how well the Colorado will suit you.

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_05.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_07.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_09.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_12.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_62.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_63.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_65.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_67.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_70.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_71.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_72.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_73.jpg

2015_Colorado_Canyon28.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_05.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_07.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_09.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_12.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_62.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_63.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_65.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_67.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_70.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_71.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_72.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_73.jpg

2015_Colorado_Canyon28.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_05.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_07.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_09.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_12.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_62.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_63.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_65.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_67.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_70.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_71.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_72.jpg

2015_Chevrolet_Colorado_Review_73.jpg

2015_Colorado_Canyon28.jpg

Posted

18 mpg city and towing? Holy...Just imagine what the Colorado Diesel will do... Honestly, Ram can have their EcoDiesel and all but I see a diesel Colorado as a big threat to the EcoDiesel. More mpg, the right size package, weight, etc. This truck may well be a big sleeper come 2016 model year. Hopefully GM can exploit it right.

Posted

18 mpg city and towing? Holy...Just imagine what the Colorado Diesel will do... Honestly, Ram can have their EcoDiesel and all but I see a diesel Colorado as a big threat to the EcoDiesel. More mpg, the right size package, weight, etc. This truck may well be a big sleeper come 2016 model year. Hopefully GM can exploit it right.

 

I completely agree. If it weren't for my 2007 Silverado burning oil, I would still be driving it and waiting for the Diesel Colorado to come out instead of driving this 2014 Silverado. I'm anxiously waiting to check out the new Diesel Colorado! GM really dropped the ball not pursuing diesel engines sooner but better late than never. Hopefully the full size trucks will get a diesel option soon too to compete with Nissan, Toyota, and Ram who will all have diesel options come next year.

Posted

18 mpg city and towing? Holy...Just imagine what the Colorado Diesel will do... Honestly, Ram can have their EcoDiesel and all but I see a diesel Colorado as a big threat to the EcoDiesel. More mpg, the right size package, weight, etc. This truck may well be a big sleeper come 2016 model year. Hopefully GM can exploit it right.

 

just imagine the Sales if GM plays their cards right, and offers the 6 speed manual with the Diesel; the Line to order that option would be Out the door, and around the block!

Posted

 

just imagine the Sales if GM plays their cards right, and offers the 6 speed manual with the Diesel; the Line to order that option would be Out the door, and around the block!

 

 

If manuals sold that well, truck makers would sell manuals. But since the take rate of manuals is abysmal, they don't.

Posted

28 mpg is impressive. The Canyon is the looker of the two though.

Posted

These trucks are awesome and fulfill nearly all of the needs for most of us. My only gripes are that the interior on the Colorado reminds me of the gm eras and that is a nasty thought in and of itself. And the "compact" truck ends up being huge with the norm bed and crew cab configuration, the same applies to the price.

 

I hope the duramax engines don't dissapoint!

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

These trucks are awesome and fulfill nearly all of the needs for most of us. My only gripes are that the interior on the Colorado reminds me of the gm eras and that is a nasty thought in and of itself. And the "compact" truck ends up being huge with the norm bed and crew cab configuration, the same applies to the price.

 

I hope the duramax engines don't dissapoint!

That is just what I thought when I saw the shift knob/handle for the automatic. Circa 90s grand am...I will look at the GMC version and the Sierra when the 8 sp trans are in them. Just something about a V-8 though.

Posted

That is just what I thought when I saw the shift knob/handle for the automatic. Circa 90s grand am...I will look at the GMC version and the Sierra when the 8 sp trans are in them. Just something about a V-8 though.

 

I actually sat in a Colorado at the Nashville Auto Show yesterday, and the Shift button is actually on the FRONT of the Shifter, the place where you THINK it would go (on the left side), is where they put the TapShift Buttons!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I would like to hear your experience towing 5000 pounds or more with Colorado or Canyon crew with V6.

 

Swaying. Surging. Acceleration. Stopping.

 

I'm considering downsizing from Silverado xcab 5.3 to pull a 3500 pound dry weight single axle camper.

 

I know the rated tow capacity. But past experience tells me handling gets squirly approaching factory rating. Do you feel comfortable towing with these trucks?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...