Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an open end rear differential. I was wondering if I could switch out some gears so I could have a locking rear end, or would I have to get a whole new rear end? I have a 2001 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT 2x4 5.3 Extended cab, if that helps for you specificity oriented people.

Posted

Many options, but you need to decide if you want a locker (gear to gear, positive lockup) or a limited slip (uses clutches to limit wheel slip).

 

I will only recommend shying away from so called lunch-box lockers that replace the side gears. They are cheaper, easy to install, but can create issues later on.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

You can replace the open differential with a number of different types; limited slip, locking, torsen and a few others.

 

The stock one for your truck would have been the G80, which is the stupidest design ever engineered. It's literally designed to be a time bomb. It is a locking type, but will only do so under certain circumstances, and often won't when you need it to. Or, will lock up when you don't want it to.

 

For normal use, I also recommend the Truetrac, which is a Torsen type. It isn't a locker, such as Nitro Dasik noted, but uses a clever design to transfer power to the wheel with the most traction. A locking type literally locks the 2 rear axles together.

I bought my Truetrac at Summit, as it had the best price at that time. I strongly recommend you have someone install it that knows what they're doing.

Posted

I have to disagree - look up g80 on you tube and you will see how it outperforms lsd on other manufacturers trucks, and only implodes when abused - and no more than any other stock set up. I do agree with the truetrac for replacement. I replaced my open diff a few years back on my 2011 avalanche with a truetrac, and it is a great improvement. I also did my gears from 3.08 to 3.42 at same time, and 4wparts will sell and install. Remember you need to change fluid 500-1000 miles after you switch (which is diy), but let a pro do the install. I loved how it worked on my 2wd (worked great on boat ramp), and would not have upgraded to a 4wd but they discontinued the model, and I wanted a loaded final edition...

 

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Posted

I have to disagree also the G80, its a good locker as I have had them since 1987 in several trucks and not one has blown up, I have 4 wheeled alot and had it in ruff conditions but if people do burn outs, doughnuts spinning the rear wheels like a mad man in mud and so on (abuse it) sure your going to blow it just like any other locker. Hell I use to run 42" Swampers with the G80 and never had a problem. A lot of people who blow them just don't know how to use a locker.

Posted

X3 on disagreeing that the G80 is junk. I have put at least 2,000,000 miles on G80's since the early 1980's. Never had one fail, although I have had my fair share of rear differential failures from pinion bearings failing and axle seals and bearings. Most miles on one truck was just shy of 500,000 and I have a truck in the driveway that has about 308,000 miles on that G80. It had a complete rear differential installed at about 4000 miles after I had 3 failures (not G80 related) in the first couple of months of ownership.

Posted

You guys can disagree all you want, but IMO the G80 is an inherently stupid design for use in the real world. It's idiotic to design something that crashes small parts together under high shock loads in order for it to work. They don't just go bang from abuse, they often explode for no reason at all. They can also lock up when you don't want them to. Or, just not work at all when you need them.

I'm not the only one with this experience.Various forums are littered with complaints about them.

 

Also, the G80's of today aren't the same as the ones in the 80's. The G80's in the 80's were limited slip positraction units with clutches. I'm not sure when GM started spec'ing the Eaton crash and smash locking units under the G80 code.

 

The one I pulled out of my 06 was troublesome almost from new. I certainly didn't abuse it. It worked mostly ok for the first 30-40,000km, but then would sometimes leave me hanging in the winter. I took it to the dealer under warranty and it worked fine for another 20-30,000km. Then it started locking up when it felt like it. Not fun on dry pavement. After trying a bunch of things and futzing with it for a long time afterwards, I finally pulled it out and threw it away. Replaced it with a Truetrac. I'm just glad that G80 never grenaded on me.

 

 

At least we agree that the Truetrac is a good unit. It's also a lot cheaper to buy than a G80.

Posted

 

 

:thumbs:

 

 

 

 

At least we agree that the Truetrac is a good unit. It's also a lot cheaper to buy than a G80.

:cheers:

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The g80 syntrifical has clutches with a slide bell between the spider gears they only work correctly if the left rear tire spins first but how ever if your foot isn't off the throttle before it locks it does look like a time bomb went off in the diff case if I could figure out how to post pics I would show you what I mean do not recommend the g80 which is a limited slip locker combo they are junk

post-170776-0-04644600-1490064456_thumb.jpg

post-170776-0-04644600-1490064456_thumb.jpg

post-170776-0-04644600-1490064456_thumb.jpg

post-170776-0-04644600-1490064456_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...