Jump to content

Inner Fender Well Lining Material


Badge767

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quick question for those of you who've had your K2XX Silverado for a bit:

 

I've only had my 2017 LT Z71 for a couple of months, but it only had 788 miles when I purchased in December 2018. The truck is still clean as a whistle, so I'm just posting this question as a pro-active measure.

 

I noticed the inner fender well lining appears to be a black material, almost reminiscent of indoor/outdoor carpet.

 

I like the look of the material, and I assume Chevy used that texture to help mitigate road noise in the cab.

 

However, it does cause me to wonder if the material has a tendency to hold moisture more so than, say a spray-on rubber based coating. I've noticed after washing my truck, the material does seem to dry pretty effectively, but hard to tell what moisture may be trapped behind it or around the edges.

 

Has anybody seen any indication of rusting behind or around the fender well lining material?

 

Thanks in advance for sending any information my way!

 

 

 

 

Posted

I have the same truck as you. Purchased in Feb 2017. Time will tell but I’m two years in and haven’t had any moisture issues related to the OEM fender liners. No rust at all.

 

The first year and a half for the truck were in Memphis. I’m in Virginia Beach now.

 

Posted

I have had mine in and out many times. And it is flexible stamped abs plastic and only the visable under side is spray carpeted. It isn't a issue as you state. But it you ever remove it look at the lowest part of the fender by the rocker and door jam. You will see large debris that comes down from the windshield in the corner by antenna also in that super small are is recycled cloth like material same as you see inside the truck under carpet. And it hold a lot of water. I have concerns of this area. Aside from just removing it nothing one can do.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
36 minutes ago, Armo325 said:

I have the same truck as you. Purchased in Feb 2017. Time will tell but I’m two years in and haven’t had any moisture issues related to the OEM fender liners. No rust at all.

 

The first year and a half for the truck were in Memphis. I’m in Virginia Beach now.

 

That's encouraging, thanks for the response!

 

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

I have had mine in and out many times. And it is flexible stamped abs plastic and only the visable under side is spray carpeted. It isn't a issue as you state. But it you ever remove it look at the lowest part of the fender by the rocker and door jam. You will see large debris that comes down from the windshield in the corner by antenna also in that super small are is recycled cloth like material same as you see inside the truck under carpet. And it hold a lot of water. I have concerns of this area. Aside from just removing it nothing one can do.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Good information on the liners Slow...that helps explain the fairly rapid drying.

 

Also good tip on the debris catchers...seems like all trucks tend to have those somewhere or the other. Fortunately for my Silverado, my wife volunteered to give up her garage space for her 2003 Expedition so I could put my truck in there instead. (God lover her!) So hopefully that'll help with the debris collection, although it still sounds like a worthwhile endeavor to engineer a way to mitigate the collection of debris and moisture in those areas.

 

On the Silverado, I do see some evidence of GM addressing those types of issues (like the weather strip on the rear of the hood to prevent debris from entering between the hood and the cowling below the windshield). Still makes me wonder why the engineers can't come up with a preventive measure on those problem areas you mentioned. Surely there's a GM engineer somewhere that has owned one of these trucks in the past two decades or so that knows first-hand where the problem areas are!

 

My 2005 Avalanche is showing early signs of a little decay in that ever-so-infamous junction of the rocker panels near the "C pillar" just forward of the rear fender well. Addressing that issue is on my radar now that Spring appears to be on our doorstep.

 

 

Posted

I’m sure these liners were well thought out so I wouldn’t worry about moisture causing any long term damage. These types of liners have been used on European luxury cars for many years. Just took the US auto makers time to catch on. 

Posted

I had my truck Ziebarted shortly after buying it.  I made sure to remove the bed liners when I had it rustproofed in the hope that they would coat those areas well, and they did.  I let it dry for a few days and reinstalled the liners.  I take them off each year for touch ups.  Gotta do what you can to prevent the salt from destroying our trucks.

Posted
I had my truck Ziebarted shortly after buying it.  I made sure to remove the bed liners when I had it rustproofed in the hope that they would coat those areas well, and they did.  I let it dry for a few days and reinstalled the liners.  I take them off each year for touch ups.  Gotta do what you can to prevent the salt from destroying our trucks.
You may have missed the ziebart post. But that company and that product is bad news. Many law suits and damage vehicles.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

The only things I've seen about Ziebart are on things other than rustproofing.  Between my father and brothers, we have been using them for rustproofing for 60+ years, on over 25 different vehicles.  None of us have ever had any issues, and all of the vehicles we've had rustproofed by them have help up much better than most cars/trucks around us, smack dab in the middle of the rust belt.  I'll take my chances.

  • 8 months later...
Posted

Just got a 2020 Silverado, and yes it has no rear inner fender liners.  The sales person told me Chevy pulled them due to rust issues(not sure I believe this).  The painted surface in the fender

well will be Swiss cheese in weeks.  Any suggestions?  What about spay-on liner?

 

 

20191219_133905.jpg

Posted
On 12/19/2019 at 2:31 PM, templar said:

Just got a 2020 Silverado, and yes it has no rear inner fender liners.  The sales person told me Chevy pulled them due to rust issues(not sure I believe this).  The painted surface in the fender

well will be Swiss cheese in weeks.  Any suggestions?  What about spay-on liner?

 

 

20191219_133905.jpg

They pulled them to make more money!  They are now optional. More rocks, salt and debris to wear the paint away in the wheel well will make it rust faster and sell more trucks. Get them protected. I took my truck apart the first week I had it. Fender liners, door pads, fenders and used a waxed based rust proofing everywhere inside the rockers, fenders, hood, doors, bed, bumpers and rubber rust proofing behind the fender liners to prevent any rubbing for debris.   I probably went overboard. But I plan to keep it awhile. 

Posted

I finally got the service and sales managers.  You are right these are optional.   They agreed to order the liners for me.  This is beyond stupid.  I definitely will be cleaning that area before they install them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes. You need to check out that thing, and the hub further.
    • Would this be normal or a worn CV Shaft? 51K miles 3.5" lift? Boots are intact and no visible leaks showing. Attached is a the video I took. Thanks     https://youtu.be/ZnW7PPRmjJY?feature=shared    
    • If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...