Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

285/6R20 should fit easily.  One guy with a non AT4 here has a 2" spacer and has 295/60R20s and they look great.  

Posted
10 hours ago, Ezekiel2517 said:

285/6R20 should fit easily.  One guy with a non AT4 here has a 2" spacer and has 295/60R20s and they look great.  

285/60/20 BFG K02 absolutely no issues. I added the larger GM splash guard as well, they fit a bit larger than the originals but still clear. I travel some gravel roads and the K02's will certainly throw some rocks. I feel the guards, especially the larger fronts help keep them off the rockers (and for the guys that keep asking about the exhaust tips mask and plastidip in place, 6 months no issues).20191024_072139.thumb.jpg.e0fdc41faba7f95907f39ad7167b1671.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

I saw 275X65X20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers on a truck on stock rims at the dealer looked great and the guy said no rubbing. Sorry no pictures wasn’t my truck.

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

At my dealer, they had a couple SLT’s with no level running 285/60-20 Duratracs with no issues. That’s the size I will be getting soon.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scooter Scott said:

That's what comes stock on my AT4.

 

2 minutes ago, Scooter Scott said:

That's what comes stock on my AT4.

I thought AT4 came with 18’s?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/13/2019 at 9:14 AM, destrada127 said:

Yes. I'm on 37s and when indicating 40mph I'm actually doing 45. At 60 it's closer to 67-68 so be careful or recalibrate4877769706aba2abddc2ce9b6038df2a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

AWESOME TRUCK!!!  I have a few questions though.  What is the part # of the Rough Country lift you installed?  What brand of fender flares are on your truck?  Finally,  any chance you could measure the distance from the pavement to the outer bottom of the door and let me know?  I'm 5'6" and want to lift my AT4 and delete my running boards but dont want to look like an Oompa Loompa getting in and out of it.  THANKS!

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/15/2019 at 7:48 PM, Darcy said:

20190615_141722.jpg

Darcy I'm not sure if I am following this thread correctly so I need to ask. What size are your tires and is your truck stock with no leveling kit. Looks great to me and sits nice. My truck is also a white AT4 with no level so I'm very curious. Thanks.

Posted

Since this thread was part of my research, I wanted to follow-up with a post that I installed LT295/60R20 Ridge Grapplers on a bone stock 2019 AT4 today. No rubbing at all and it looks awesome.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you.  That’s what I was looking for.  Trying to decide if it’s enough to justify upgrading from the stock 275 60s. If you have any pictures I’d love to see

Posted (edited)

Absolutely worth it.  The trucks "man-card" comes with these tires. I wanted to go with the much lighter XL305/55R20, but it does rub.  Though the photos really don't do it justice, I tried to take picks of what I would like to see when considering. 

 

Edited by DanBlp
Delete and downsize photo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...