Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

While I was admiring the underside of my bran new 19 Silverado I noticed the exhaust pipe, immediately after the cat, is squished, like super flat... Has anyone replaced that section with a normal round piece of tubing? Did it make any improvements in sound/mpg? Seems like it must! 

Posted

That's the way they are supposed to be, even the Camaros are that way, tests have been done with changing out the pipe and there were no changes. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I know for a fact that the dents are a byproduct of the bending or flat area tube forming process.  It's not easy to manufacture a pipe with a flat so close to a bend or even bends close to insertion joints (connections) - it's the nature of the beast.  Sometimes the material doesn't cooperate or small mistakes are made during the manufacturing process and missed by human eyes (in the case of the dents) during visual inspection.  Often, GM will overlook small "shortcomings" like this because while visually not appealing or causing possible end owner concern, they are of little impact to how the full emissions system ends up working and the name of the game is to continue pumping out trucks from the assembly plants.  Both GM and the exhaust supplier work out the kinks (no pun intended) in the meantime.  That's why the dents (pictured in the older thread) will more than likely or should I say hopefully slowly start to disappear as more trucks (and exhaust systems) are built.

Edited by Wheelguy
Posted

I noticed how the exhaust on my 5.3 is "clearanced" where it crosses over.  

I'm not an engineer, and I'm sure it's not as constrictive as it looks...but being pinched off like that looks painful.  Seems to me there would be reduced flow due to the turbulence it would make.  

crossover.jpg

Posted

Yes, once my MBRP cat back gets here I'll take the truck down to the muffler shop to get a proper round tube fitted. The squished one just annoys my OCD.

Posted (edited)

The design of that crossover pipe is absolutely nothing with which you should be concerned to the point you start removing stock tubing in favor of round tubes.

 

Pipes are formed in specific shapes for good reasons - typically for either access (getting a tool to a fastener behind a pipe) or clearance.  The simplest form of a pipe is round and straight - they don't deviate from that shape for sh!ts & giggles.  Once the emission gasses pass through the converters, it's all about acoustics (sound) and volume (inside the tubes, collector, adaptive valves, muffler and any resonators, etc.).  The volume in that area of the crossover pipe is pretty much the same as the round tube portion would be.  When making pipes with these types of features and using the cheaper manufacturing methods for high volumes (quantity), material is typically moved around, not removed or reduced (or that is at least the goal) during the forming process.

 

There are GM requirements for clearing both vehicle undercarriage, surrounding components as well as ground clearance.  That's what GM ends up with given those requirements.  The previous generation (K2XX) crossover pipe was also formed in a similar fashion but has a different cross sectional shape in that general area.  The design of that area of the crossover pipe takes into consideration the starting tube diameter/circumference, so putting a round tube in there will change nothing other than possibly start causing interference which can lead to undesirable noises or taking damage under certain conditions.  The entire system is tested both virtually (simulated on a computer using 3D models) and physically literally years before these trucks are built.  The entire exhaust system performs the way GM desires it to perform, even with that flattened tubing.  If there were any deviations from expected flow behavior, there is absolutely no way GM would allow those pipes on production intent vehicles and the supplier wouldn't be too keen on spending money on tooling to produce parts that ended up being a detriment somehow (of course, that all depends on how GM desires the system functions as a whole, too).

 

However weird anything with the exhaust systems look, there's usually a very good reason GM didn't want that pipe to be round on either side or have a bash here or there.  They don't make manufacturing a pipe more difficult, time consuming and costly just for looks or their own amusement.  That costs GM money.  The suppliers of the exhaust systems don't deform, flatten, bash, etc. tubing for looks or wasting machine production time either - that stuff costs money and they want it out of the plant as soon as possible in terms of processing time.

 

But hey, it's your time and money you're wasting and it's your truck - you do what you want with it.

 

Finally, I wouldn't waste my time responding to any of this if I didn't have intimate and first hand knowledge about the above, whatever that may be worth to you.

Edited by Wheelguy
Posted

Wow, you put a lot of effort into that post to say the same thing over and over. I bet you also agree with GM on the whole Auto Start/Stop function too...?

There is absolutely no other reason for that squished pipe other than for clearance and maybe to quiet the exhaust down to Denali owner desires. I desire 'some' noise from my truck and rather than spending $800 on a full exhaust system (where you remove EVERY stock tubing), I'll just tune the stock system and this is a super easy/simple way of achieving 'some' noise. My last truck (05 LLY Duramax) had a similar squished downtube that was for clearance also. After I replaced it with a true 3" round downtube I gained better throttle response, lower EGT's and better sound so, I'm speaking from intimate and first hand experience.

Posted (edited)

Wow, you put a lot of effort into being more or less a dick. Sorry but, my crystal ball was in the shop, ace. Hope you get the sound you’re after.

Edited by Wheelguy
Posted

I would rather get a quality catback instead of hacking up my factory y pipe for "more sound". It will do virtually nothing on this truck without removal of the cats and I bet cutting that y pipe will void your warranty. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On ‎8‎/‎1‎/‎2019 at 10:58 AM, Wheelguy said:

The design of that crossover pipe is absolutely nothing with which you should be concerned to the point you start removing stock tubing in favor of round tubes.

 

Pipes are formed in specific shapes for good reasons - typically for either access (getting a tool to a fastener behind a pipe) or clearance.  The simplest form of a pipe is round and straight - they don't deviate from that shape for sh!ts & giggles.  Once the emission gasses pass through the converters, it's all about acoustics (sound) and volume (inside the tubes, collector, adaptive valves, muffler and any resonators, etc.).  The volume in that area of the crossover pipe is pretty much the same as the round tube portion would be.  When making pipes with these types of features and using the cheaper manufacturing methods for high volumes (quantity), material is typically moved around, not removed or reduced (or that is at least the goal) during the forming process.

 

There are GM requirements for clearing both vehicle undercarriage, surrounding components as well as ground clearance.  That's what GM ends up with given those requirements.  The previous generation (K2XX) crossover pipe was also formed in a similar fashion but has a different cross sectional shape in that general area.  The design of that area of the crossover pipe takes into consideration the starting tube diameter/circumference, so putting a round tube in there will change nothing other than possibly start causing interference which can lead to undesirable noises or taking damage under certain conditions.  The entire system is tested both virtually (simulated on a computer using 3D models) and physically literally years before these trucks are built.  The entire exhaust system performs the way GM desires it to perform, even with that flattened tubing.  If there were any deviations from expected flow behavior, there is absolutely no way GM would allow those pipes on production intent vehicles and the supplier wouldn't be too keen on spending money on tooling to produce parts that ended up being a detriment somehow (of course, that all depends on how GM desires the system functions as a whole, too).

 

However weird anything with the exhaust systems look, there's usually a very good reason GM didn't want that pipe to be round on either side or have a bash here or there.  They don't make manufacturing a pipe more difficult, time consuming and costly just for looks or their own amusement.  That costs GM money.  The suppliers of the exhaust systems don't deform, flatten, bash, etc. tubing for looks or wasting machine production time either - that stuff costs money and they want it out of the plant as soon as possible in terms of processing time.

 

But hey, it's your time and money you're wasting and it's your truck - you do what you want with it.

 

Finally, I wouldn't waste my time responding to any of this if I didn't have intimate and first hand knowledge about the above, whatever that may be worth to you.

As much as I enjoyed the read, unless you calculated the CFM of the cross section of the crushed area this is all BS.  Cost overrides quality at GM and most OEM's.  The machine to crush this tube is much cheaper the fabricating a nice oval or hydroforming the tube to keep the size consistent.  When I get the time to cut mine off, I will calculate the CFM of the crushed area and I'd bet a  C note that the left bank is running richer than the right due to flow restriction on that side.  The flappers are a bigger joke.  When I took my exhaust off to put the Borla cat back on, at only 4000 mile they already had carbon build up.  These are probably why GM extended warrantee does not cover the exhaust, they know these valves will fail. 

 

I have been in automotive engineering for 30 years, 10 at GM and I build race cars and trucks for fun.  Think of your engine as a simple air pump, fast smooth in and fast smooth out makes for more efficiency.

20191010_180053_resized.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I just changed out that squashed pipe on my 2021 Silverado 4.3 v6. Also had the tech weld open that silly muffler flap. These are the results:

*sounds a bit louder when I accelerate 
*the engine doesn’t sound like it’s struggling, in fact - the shifting in gears is much smoother for some reason

*maybe a mile or two increase in mpg

 

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 7/24/2019 at 6:25 AM, code-man26 said:

While I was admiring the underside of my bran new 19 Silverado I noticed the exhaust pipe, immediately after the cat, is squished, like super flat... Has anyone replaced that section with a normal round piece of tubing? Did it make any improvements in sound/mpg? Seems like it must! 

i noticed the same thing on mine as well as a dent in the passenger side s pipe coming off the manifold just before the cats, the in between piece. i'm considering doing a forced induction setup on mine

 

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I am having the same problem. However I have noticed it is slowly getting worse and I believe it is because of the condensation from the a/c pours on the exhaust crossover pipe after I park my truck. I know for fact that I haven’t hit anything. The top and bottom look like they are being beaten with a hammer. And I believe it’s because the cold water pouring in it is cooling it fast making it expand or contract. Has anyone had the issue with the condensation pouring on their pipes?

Posted

Flattened pipe is by design. 

They've been doing it this way for years. 

It's not getting worse from being dripped on or from driving in the rain or running thru the carwash etc etc

 

 

https://gm-techlink.com/?p=13456  

 

Exhaust Pipe Shaped to Avoid Low Contact

July 30, 2020

A quick look at the exhaust pipe crossover section on 2019-2020 Silverado and Sierra models equipped with a V6 or V8 engine shows that it is not a completely round shape as other parts of the pipe. (Fig. 27) The unique shape of the exhaust pipe is by design. The kinks or shape of the pipe does not indicate the pipe is damaged.

 

F27-exhaust-3.pngFig. 27

 

The exhaust pipe is distinctly formed in order to make it higher from the ground than the adjacent frame members. (Fig. 28) Due to its unique shape, it is not the lowest part on the vehicle and is protected by the frame from contact while traversing over areas with low ground clearance, which helps prevent it from being struck by objects passing under the vehicle. While driving off road, for example, an object would strike the frame first.

 

F28-exhaust-2.pngFig. 28

 

The design of the crossover section of the exhaust pipe is hydroformed, or shaped by hydraulic pressure, to an ovate shape that has the same cross-section as a round part of the pipe.

There is no flow restriction from the shape and it does not affect engine performance in any way. (Fig. 29)

 

F29-exhaust-4.pngFig. 29

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had a new engine installed with under 5,000 miles. It shut off coming around a residential street corner and wouldn't restart. Dealer indicated it seized. New one has been fine since with 10,000 miles on the replaced engine. Annoying but I was given a loaner for the 5 weeks it was down. I won't go with the 6.2l gasser so it's 3.0l again. I love the economy and it tows my enclosed car trailer just fine. 
    • Coming back from towing a car to my daughter in Nashville truck started making a screaming noise from underneath.  Pulled over placed in park and sure enough whining noise from underneath.  Dropped at the dealer fearing new tranny or another front pump/cover replacement.  Service writer said it sounded like the tranny too...  Well $300, new idler and a belt all is good.  Pop the hood and give a listen. lol  Now I'm telling dealers I'm no longer interested in a new truck.
    • HD uses the 6.6 gas.   Oil consumption while heavy working is considered normal.  1 quart per 100 gallons of fuel is the normal rate above 8600lbs GVWR.  If more than that, it is considered excessive.   They will have to perform an oil consumption test using the guidelines in TSB 03-06-01-023J.     Information on Engine Oil Consumption Guidelines All engines require oil to lubricate and protect the load bearing and internal moving parts from wear including cylinder walls, pistons, and piston rings. When a piston moves down its cylinder, a thin film of oil is left on the cylinder wall. During the combustion process, part of this oil layer is consumed. As a result, varying rates of oil consumption are accepted as normal in all engines. Oil Consumption Oil usage has a direct relationship with the amount of fuel used. The harder an engine works, the more fuel and oil it will use. Therefore, oil usage as a factor of fuel usage is a more accurate indicator of acceptable oil consumption levels than vehicle mileage for vehicles at or above 8600 GVW. The accepted rate of oil consumption for gasoline engines in vehicles at or above 8600 GVW is 1 liter (1 qt) within 400 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used. This rate only applies to vehicles under warranty, maintained in accordance with the appropriate maintenance schedule, driven at legal speeds and within design intent of the vehicle. Many factors can affect an owner's concern with oil consumption. Driving habits and vehicle maintenance vary from owner to owner. Thoroughly evaluate each case before deciding whether the vehicle in question has abnormal engine oil consumption. Gasket and External Leaks Inspect the oil pans, engine covers, and the engine oil cooler for leakage. Inspect for oil leakage into the engine coolant. Improper Reading of the Oil Level Indicator (Dipstick) The vehicle must be parked on a level surface to obtain accurate oil level readings. Verify that the dipstick tube is fully seated in the block. When checking the oil level, make sure the dipstick is wiped clean before taking an oil level reading and fully depress the dipstick until the shoulder bottoms out on the dipstick tube. The dipstick should be the proper part number for the engine/vehicle that is being checked. Not Waiting Long Enough After Running Engine to Check Oil Level The vehicle should be allowed to sit for at least 15 minutes, after the engine has been shut off, before taking an oil level reading to assure the oil has had enough time to drain back into the crankcase. In order to ensure accurate results, the temperature of the oil should be close to the same temperature as the last time the oil level was checked. Improper Oil Fill After an Oil Change Following an oil change, verify that the proper amount and type of oil was put in the engine and that the oil level on the dipstick is not above the full mark or below the add marks. Refer to the Owner's Manual or Service Manual for information on recommended oil quantity, viscosity, and quality. High Speed or High RPM Driving Continuous driving at high speeds/high RPMs may increase oil consumption. Because this may not always be an everyday occurrence, it is hard to determine exactly how much the oil economy will be affected. Towing or Heavy Usage Towing a trailer or hauling additional weight will increase oil consumption. Large frontal area trailers will further increase the work required from the engine, especially at highway speeds, and thus increases the rate of oil consumption. PTO Operation Operation of a PTO will increase fuel and oil usage, as the PTO driven accessory uses engine power to operate. Crankcase Ventilation System Verify that the positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system is operating properly. Blockages, restrictions, or damage to the PCV system can result in increased oil use. Oil Dilution from Condensation On vehicles that are usually driven short distances, less than 8 km (5 mi), especially in colder weather, condensation generated from cold engine operation may not get hot enough to evaporate out of the oil. When this occurs, the dipstick may indicate that the oil level is over-full. Subsequent driving on a trip of sufficient length to enable normal engine operating temperature for 30 minutes or more, in order to vaporize excess moisture, may give the customer the impression of excessive oil consumption. Engine Temperature If an engine is run at overheated temperatures (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual) for more than brief periods, oil will oxidize at a faster than normal rate. In addition, gaskets may distort, piston rings may stick, and excessive wear may result. Verify that all cooling system components are in proper working order. Engine Wear Piston scuffing, excessive piston-to-wall clearance, tapered or out of round cylinders, worn, damaged or improperly installed valve guides, seals and piston rings will all cause an increase in oil consumption. Measurement of Oil Consumption Engines require a period of time to BREAK IN so that moving parts are properly seated. Therefore, oil economy should not be tested until the vehicle has accumulated at least 6400 km (4000 mi). An exception would be allowed only if an engine is reported to be using more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 1600 km (1000 mi).   Verify that the engine has no external leaks. Repair as necessary. Verify that the engine is at normal operating temperature (see Owner's Manual or Service Manual). Park the vehicle on a level surface. Wait at least 15 minutes, after the engine is shut off, before checking the oil level to make sure that most of the oil has had time to drain back into the crankcase. Check the oil level and record the vehicle mileage, date, and exact oil level on the form included in this bulletin. Next ensure the oil level is at, but not above, the full mark on the dipstick. add oil if necessary. Also ensure the proper viscosity and quality oil are being used as recommended in the Owner Manual Ask the customer once they have consumed 100 gallons of fuel schedule an appointment and return to the dealer for inspection. If the final evaluation shows that the engine uses more than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, follow the published symptom diagnostics as described in the appropriate Service Manual. If the oil consumption test shows that the engine uses less than 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 379 liters (100 gallons) of fuel used, explain to the customer that their engine meets the guidelines for oil consumption.  
    • I have a 2024 Chevy Silverado 2500 with the 6.2 liter engine, Vin: 2GC4YME79R1273849, with 27,437 miles. Recently we took a trip from Candor, NY to Townsend, TN pulling our fifth wheel, when I got close to the Townsend, TN area The truck gave me a message of low oil. I checked the dip stick and found it was 2 quarts low. Today, August 27, 2026, I had the oil changed and the technician Found the truck was very low on oil.  Is there a Recall for this? What is my recourse for this issue? Do I call the dealer where I bought it or any chevy dealer?   Robert Strickland 292 Owego Road Candor, NY 13743 352-502-6588 [email protected]
    • We understand the importance of understanding how your Sierra performs, @SoCal Angler. Our team would like to gather the proper details to assist you with your inquiry about your truck's automatic braking. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.chevy.com/support-request and fill out the request form with pertinent details. This will ensure your request is routed correctly so we may take a further look. We will keep an eye out for your outreach.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...