Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"A few observations about my truck's vibrations:

They seem to be worse with higher psi in my 10 ply tires."

 

I'm thinking that a Rolls Royce might transfer road caused vibration into the car if it should have 10 ply tires. I've been reading this thread closely as I have a 2015 Silverado 1500 Crew 6.2 4x4 with 12k miles and it rides really smooth. In fact , much smoother and quieter than my previous 2008 Silverado Crew 5.3. I've been reading other reviews, Edmunds, others, and I've noticed that many of the posters here are also posting all over the Internet using the exact same postings down to the word, appears a lot of copy/paste is going on. So, I'm beginning to question just how large this problem actually is. Concerning comments that GM may be trying to cover this up; The General is certainly capable of this as history shows by the ignition key scandal. However, GM may have learned its lesson from this as its not over being a judge has recently allowed complainants to sue. One more of these could very well bankrupt the General. So, I'm skeptical about comments that there's a coverup going on. My two bits, calf rope, I'm through :)

buddy, when the poll results are in, you will see what's what. for my selling dealer to mention there "used" to be a vibration problem but it's fixed for 16 and then my servicing dealer to tell me that we can balance the tires but anything beyond that it has to be done by the selling dealer, that's what gm is making us do? you know it's a wide spread issue.

 

i'll say it again, for a variety of reasons these trucks have vibrations or unsettling rides transmitted to the driver especially, there's a an occasional tire problem or drivetrain component not up to spec, but much of that would be tolerable if it weren't for the sub par nvh design. gmc went out of their way to put noise cancelling in the denali's for a reason. issue is too deeply rooted in the trucks design to rectify 100% or it would have been done already.

 

you cannot say that this issue doesn't exist when there's VIDEOS of it all over internet showing you it's happening in all parts of the country.

 

now does that mean more than 1% of owners notice it? or have it? 1% 400000 is still 4k truck owners. and who is going to seek out a forum and this specific topic? so in end poll may show you it's small percentage. not a big deal if you're NOT noticing or care about it because your truck "Masks" the problem better than others. read gminsidenews.com one of the tech contributors on staff hit nail on head. someone's head is going to roll because of this error in calculations in design causing a resonance felt by so many....

Posted

"buddy, when the poll results are in, you will see what's what."

 

Well, first things first; I'm not your buddy, never have been and never will be. And, btw I do understand that even if this vibration problem should affect only a very small percent of total population it's a 100% problem if it's your truck. I'm just skeptical that it's as large a problem as portrayed on this site. I've yet to personally come across anyone that's had this problem that's all. When I see a post stating someone is running juiced up 10 ply tires, I'm thinking duh, picking up road vibration? Really? Also, noticed there's a bunch of backyard mechanics who have made this or that modification to their truck then complain that they've got vibration problems. Imagine that. So, appears to me there's a lack of objective data about this. However, if "my" truck should develop this problem I freely admit that I will probably come over to your side. How's that ?

Posted

27 October 2015 - 04:41 PM

 

bdfranz, on 23 Oct 2015 - 4:14 PM, said:snapback.png

 

 

GM dealer says its the tires (GoodYear Wrangler) that are the cause of the highway vibrations and its normal. Really don't know what to say to that except BS. There is something seriously weird with the way it vibrates. Not just a tire vibration almost like the shocks aren't dampening the vibrations. Going to invest $400 in the Bilstein 5100 has the stock Rancho's on it now.

 

 

Well its been 3 months but I received and installed the Bilstein shocks and Michelin tires for my Silverado. "Problem solved" What a difference those shocks and tires make. Totally different feeling truck. Adjusted the shocks to the highest setting and now with a full tank of gas the front and back are the same height and no more vibrations. Worth the $1400 investment.

 

Wow...is this for real? Can different shocks make such such difference? Please keep us all updated!

Posted (edited)

Wow...is this for real? Can different shocks make such such difference? Please keep us all updated!

 

Unfortunately no this is not the case. I put Bilstein 5100's on mine and it didn't change a thing for the highway vibe. It rides better around town and would definitely recommend them but if you're looking for it to cure the highway shake it won't. The above poster probably got lucky that his was out of balance tires and when the new michelins were put on the balance was corrected. Plus it is a much better tire so I don't doubt that it reduce or masked the vibes.I have also had 4 sets of tires (all different brands - Nitto, Cooper, Toyo, and Goodyear) and 2 sets of wheels (one stock and one aftermarket) and the vibration over 73mph has not changed at all. Some have gotten lucky with balance but for most of us it is an out of spec part(s).

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by hotrodz37
Posted

i could totally believe that this reduced the issue to acceptable levels. I think that shocks (ranchos) are terrible in this configuration. The shocks do NOTHING to dampen the impacts even the slight undulations felt at highway speed on relatively smooth hwy...

 

and the Tires? the wranglers just compound the problem, even the LS2 Eagles are better than these. but then again, is it our fault for buying trucks with off road suspension and tires and complaining about the ride quality at 75mph? lol idk...

 

if it is the pinion causing these issues? by all means, but if it was just the tire/shock combo? i would think they would have fixed it by 16... and mine feels unsettled. lowering the tire pressure did nothing to stop or quell it in anyway.. i will have it on the hwy in couple weeks for 300 mile trip. fingers crossed it's repaired with just the front tire being road force balanced!!

 

 

This week will tell, I'll be driving to and from work 70 miles one way on several different pavement types will see how this combo (tires and shocks) plays out. Yeah never really expected this truck to drive like a car and probably my fault for not paying more attention when buying it. Should have known that a used 2014 with 6k on it sitting on the lot had problems. I will let everyone know how is goes after a few days of break-in.

Posted

There is an interesting post on the SUV threads that someone put "lightweight" 20" wheels to replace to OE 22" on an Escalade, and the buffeting all but is gone. Implication is that the lighter wheels somehow made a difference.

 

Anyone have any feedback? I know some of you have put on different tires, and some different wheels. Anyone pay attention the the weight of the wheel/tire assemblies and care to "weigh" in (pun intended!).

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

"A few observations about my truck's vibrations:

They seem to be worse with higher psi in my 10 ply tires."

 

I'm thinking that a Rolls Royce might transfer road caused vibration into the car if it should have 10 ply tires. I've been reading this thread closely as I have a 2015 Silverado 1500 Crew 6.2 4x4 with 12k miles and it rides really smooth. In fact , much smoother and quieter than my previous 2008 Silverado Crew 5.3. I've been reading other reviews, Edmunds, others, and I've noticed that many of the posters here are also posting all over the Internet using the exact same postings down to the word, appears a lot of copy/paste is going on. So, I'm beginning to question just how large this problem actually is. Concerning comments that GM may be trying to cover this up; The General is certainly capable of this as history shows by the ignition key scandal. However, GM may have learned its lesson from this as its not over being a judge has recently allowed complainants to sue. One more of these could very well bankrupt the General. So, I'm skeptical about comments that there's a coverup going on. My two bits, calf rope, I'm through :)

 

 

Not sure if I had mentioned this in my post, but my vibrations started well before I switched to 10 ply tires. I was running stock tires with no modifications to my truck at the time.

 

Regarding the number of people affected, the GM service managers I've talked to have seen multiple trucks with these problems, even at smaller dealerships.

Edited by gmtruck828
Posted (edited)

"buddy, when the poll results are in, you will see what's what."

 

Well, first things first; I'm not your buddy, never have been and never will be. And, btw I do understand that even if this vibration problem should affect only a very small percent of total population it's a 100% problem if it's your truck. I'm just skeptical that it's as large a problem as portrayed on this site. I've yet to personally come across anyone that's had this problem that's all. When I see a post stating someone is running juiced up 10 ply tires, I'm thinking duh, picking up road vibration? Really? Also, noticed there's a bunch of backyard mechanics who have made this or that modification to their truck then complain that they've got vibration problems. Imagine that. So, appears to me there's a lack of objective data about this. However, if "my" truck should develop this problem I freely admit that I will probably come over to your side. How's that ?

 

I live a very small town, have known my dealer all my life, grew up together, police visited together :happysad:, I think you get it. At one time of the 15 new trucks on his lot, 7 had the vibration. Crusty old farmers aren't on this site, they visit the dealer. Like the one I ran into Thursday when I was making an appointment for my replacement trucks first vibration appointment. The only lack of data is from GM, they don't have a clue how to fix this because it has been going on for 3 years. Or if they do it is because of the cost to fix it. If this isn't a big problem why isn't GM just buying back a handful of trucks and moving on? Trucks and the big SUV's is where they make their money, they should have stopped production when this started and figured it out then. The cost of doing that would have been small compared to what it is going to cost in lost customers, customers lost for LIFE. If you don't have the vib, good for you, but you have no idea how mad this makes those of us that have it. You absolutely hate driving it. I have a 0% loan I guess at this point I'll put up with it for a year and wait for the 2016 Ford's to have a 0% deal and take the hit. I and the rest of the vibrators want a GM that doesn't vibrate. I really don't think that's too much to ask, and honestly that's the only thing I want.

Edited by paxtonman
Posted (edited)

Here are my results. I've been fighting for a year now and I've still gotten no where. This last time I finally got a pico test done, but I can't decipher it. If anything my vibration is now worse after they repositioned my cab.

post-134195-0-68255600-1451872421_thumb.jpg

post-134195-0-68255600-1451872421_thumb.jpg

post-134195-0-68255600-1451872421_thumb.jpg

post-134195-0-68255600-1451872421_thumb.jpg

Edited by skylineflyer
Posted

This week will tell, I'll be driving to and from work 70 miles one way on several different pavement types will see how this combo (tires and shocks) plays out. Yeah never really expected this truck to drive like a car and probably my fault for not paying more attention when buying it. Should have known that a used 2014 with 6k on it sitting on the lot had problems. I will let everyone know how is goes after a few days of break-in.

mark your tire and rims for slippage . This would cause out of balance and then vibs.
Posted (edited)

"buddy, when the poll results are in, you will see what's what."

 

Well, first things first; I'm not your buddy, never have been and never will be. And, btw I do understand that even if this vibration problem should affect only a very small percent of total population it's a 100% problem if it's your truck. I'm just skeptical that it's as large a problem as portrayed on this site. I've yet to personally come across anyone that's had this problem that's all. When I see a post stating someone is running juiced up 10 ply tires, I'm thinking duh, picking up road vibration? Really? Also, noticed there's a bunch of backyard mechanics who have made this or that modification to their truck then complain that they've got vibration problems. Imagine that. So, appears to me there's a lack of objective data about this. However, if "my" truck should develop this problem I freely admit that I will probably come over to your side. How's that ?

 

OK, For starters, Why should anyone get into an argument over this? If your truck is running fine then why bother even posting anything but "My truck is running fine"? We are all just trying to get to the bottom of the problem.

 

Another thing is if so many guys have been getting the balancing done and saying it does not do anything why would you even let them do it again?

 

Some have stated on here about even getting new rims and tires and other parts changed from the dealer and that still did not help.

 

Should GM come out of hiding and at least say they have a problem even though they don't have a clue what is wrong? YES THEY SHOULD........

 

I have the problem and I know there are a lot of others out there that have the problem. It does not matter if even just one or two people have this problem if it was you, you would want it fixed period...

 

Just trying to keep things civilized on this post, we have enough problems complaining about GM so we don't have to keep complaining about each other.

Edited by rshad
  • Like 3
Posted

 

I live a very small town, have known my dealer all my life, grew up together, police visited together :happysad:, I think you get it. At one time of the 15 new trucks on his lot, 7 had the vibration. Crusty old farmers aren't on this site, they visit the dealer. Like the one I ran into Thursday when I was making an appointment for my replacement trucks first vibration appointment. The only lack of data is from GM, they don't have a clue how to fix this because it has been going on for 3 years. Or if they do it is because of the cost to fix it. If this isn't a big problem why isn't GM just buying back a handful of trucks and moving on? Trucks and the big SUV's is where they make their money, they should have stopped production when this started and figured it out then. The cost of doing that would have been small compared to what it is going to cost in lost customers, customers lost for LIFE. If you don't have the vib, good for you, but you have no idea how mad this makes those of us that have it. You absolutely hate driving it. I have a 0% loan I guess at this point I'll put up with it for a year and wait for the 2016 Ford's to have a 0% deal and take the hit. I and the rest of the vibrators want a GM that doesn't vibrate. I really don't think that's too much to ask, and honestly that's the only thing I want.

My small town dealer seeing problems too. And I'am a crusty old farmer.

Posted

I believe this will translate to the trucks. Some of us have suspected this.

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2015/12/31/fullsize-gm-suvs-have-problem-that-making-owners-sick/?intcmp=features

 

Seen that article and FOX news cast the other day. The thing is they don't mention the trucks so I emailed them and told them what was going on. We have to start sending news outlets emails or phone calls letting them know about our problem to get it out there so GM will take notice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...