Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What is the difference between the "traditional cone mount" and "hub mount"? Same thing,market they? There is really only two centering designs for automotive wheels - hub centric and lug (wheel bolt) centric. The centering come on a balance machine would centre the wheel to the centre bore in the wheel, which would be the bore that the hub would also fit snug to to centre the wheel. Alternately, lug centric uses the tapered lug nuts to centre the wheel, with the wheel centre bore being larger that the axle hub.

 

Or you could be like GM, and have the wheel bore snug to the hub (hub centric) and use tapered lug nuts (lug centric) and see who wins the centering fight!!

 

Now, there are different centering cones for the Hunter balance machine. Likely they didn't have the correct one for aluminum wheels on your truck. As I recall, it's some kind of "reverse" cone arrangement. Sounds funky, and like anything else funky, can be a source of human error. Just saying......

I know the rims are hub centric, has anyone tried non-tapered lug nuts ...

Posted

y

 

 

Hello Thake618,

We value you as a customer and care about your concerns. Please private message me more details so I can better assist you.

Best,

Julianne M.

GM Customer Care

ou guys can contact me, you have my information. im not going to waste my time for another person to tell me the same thing.

Posted

Since I'm challenged when it comes to pics. It's the ruby red metallic, garnet i would call it. Crew cab short box 4X4 5.0 with 3.31 gear, could have maybe gone with the 3.55 but i had just found out after waiting 6 months the truck ordered for me was junk. If I was Ford I'd put a supercharger on the 5.0 and match up to the 6.2. My pissed off level was off the charts after test driving the truck I waited 6 months for. Ford sticker was 59, Sierra sticker was 54, traded for 9. Screwed or not at this point i don't care, hated the vibrating no head light sierra and when the new one finally showed up it vibrated worse then the 2 previous ones. I knew I was done with gmc. For comparison sake, engine goes to gm, the 6.2 is king, seats go to Ford, better lumbar for me at least. Rear seat area, no comparison, Ford. Console area and overall buttons, etc. I give to gm, I've had them so long just know where everything is. Camera system, Ford. Overall feel, Ford, just feels solid, close the doors, just has the thud. Maybe the alum is thicker I don't know, just feels more substantial. Driving quality, Ford, it doesn't vibrate. I'm sure some will flame and tarnish, go ahead, unless you have lived with this for a year, you don't know, and GM doesn't know, how totally pissed off people get. Probably lost a lifetime friend over these 3 trucks but I won't go back and I am steering my 3 boys away from GM, but in the end, GM doesn't care, they never did.

Posted (edited)

Sooooo I got a letter from GM today offering a full price trade assist.........

Edited by Jesse D
  • Like 2
Posted

Sooooo I got a letter from GM today offering a full price trade assist.........

 

Dude, that is awesome.

Posted

Sooooo I got a letter from GM today offering a full price trade assist.........

 

Nice, but do you really want to take the chance on another GM truck?

Posted

 

Nice, but do you really want to take the chance on another GM truck?

No, I'm scared to death of it. but at the same point, there is no guarantee in Lemon Law, even though I have enough information that should basically guarantee it, and if I try to get rid of my truck on my own, I'm out a sh*t ton..... so IDK what to do

Posted

No, I'm scared to death of it. but at the same point, there is no guarantee in Lemon Law, even though I have enough information that should basically guarantee it, and if I try to get rid of my truck on my own, I'm out a sh*t ton..... so IDK what to do

 

Get the best truck they will give you. Hell, get one of those diesel Canyons.

Posted

 

Get the best truck they will give you. Hell, get one of those diesel Canyons.

F*CK the CRAPYONS lol, tiny *ss thing isn't a truck, it is a lunch box :crackup:

  • Like 1
Posted

F*CK the CRAPYONS lol, tiny *ss thing isn't a truck, it is a lunch box

 

 

Well ........ What are you gonna do? Switching to a Sierra? SUV? Lunch box perhaps?

Posted

 

 

Well ........ What are you gonna do? Switching to a Sierra? SUV? Lunch box perhaps?

If I take the offer, I will be trying to switch to sierra because I don't like the new look of the Shakerados.

Posted

With the trade assist can one lease if you where previously financed to buy?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

With the trade assist can one lease if you where previously financed to buy?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

no idea, good question lol, could save me alot of money

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...