Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Barak said:

.....My next step is continue driving and monitoring to see if any changes occur but did tell them I will be taking my cousin’s 2019 year model same exact truck on same roads to see if his exhibits the same shake/vibration at any speeds. Stay tuned! 

Having the dealer compare your K2XX vibration to a T1XX makes no sense.  They do not have the same frame. They are the next generation truck.

Posted
3 hours ago, Barak said:

 Basically they said that they let some air pressure out of rear tires to make ride more comfortable otherwise they feel truck is within “GM’s specs”. 

I guarantee you paid double for your truck what I paid for mine and I still wont accept the "GM SPECS" BS. If they cant correct a known and faulty product, they need to buy it back or replace it with one that is "NEW CONDITION" meaning its a fully working product with NO issues. 

 

The people who just "Deal with it" not only empower GM to not stand behind the company made issues, its also lining the pockets of every corporate monkey in the company. 

 

My 2 cents (because GM got the rest) 

 

 

Posted

So Brianibew, you’re saying 2018 and 2019 are not the same frame? How do we tell? The trucks body is exactly the same from interior perspective. GMCJoe17 - you are right about the price aspect. However, I am now only 1000 miles on this truck and I feel I am starting to get comfortable with it. Never owned a diesel so I want to explore everything but it’s never late to go back and tell them I am still experiencing it. Maybe it’s just me too little since I went from F250 to Denali, to mention that F250 was gas, rough, bumpy, etc.  and I only drove F250 for several months. I think time will tell too but based on what Brian says, I will have to comapre 2018 to 2018 in my case. Thanks all! 

Posted
4 hours ago, Barak said:

So went back in to dealership due to shake/vibration at 70-75mph speeds. They examined everything on truck including taking it for a ride prior and after and couldn’t duplicate what I told them my issue was. Basically they said that they let some air pressure out of rear tires to make ride more comfortable otherwise they feel truck is within “GM’s specs”. After our conversation they did tell me to continue monitoring and certainly let them know if it changes like gets worst. They did also say that I will feel little stiffer and possibly shaky/vibration at instances due to heavy duty truck especially being diesel etc... I do get that aspect and I told them interesting to learn that for high end expensive truck. I did indicate to them that when at 55-65mph speeds, the truck rides smooth no shakes or anything but as soon as I am on thruways/highways at 70+mph it tends to pick up. My next step is continue driving and monitoring to see if any changes occur but did tell them I will be taking my cousin’s 2019 year model same exact truck on same roads to see if his exhibits the same shake/vibration at any speeds. Stay tuned! 

Batak, I basic have the same truck only it’s a 2015. Mine is smooth as glass at all speeds.

Posted

So Brianibew, you’re saying 2018 and 2019 are not the same frame? How do we tell? The trucks body is exactly the same from interior perspective. GMCJoe17 - you are right about the price aspect. However, I am now only 1000 miles on this truck and I feel I am starting to get comfortable with it. Never owned a diesel so I want to explore everything but it’s never late to go back and tell them I am still experiencing it. Maybe it’s just me too little since I went from F250 to Denali, to mention that F250 was gas, rough, bumpy, etc.  and I only drove F250 for several months. I think time will tell too but based on what Brian says, I will have to comapre 2018 to 2018 in my case. Thanks all! 

Posted

Well that’s great. I have Goodyear Wrangler SR-A which came stock and I haven’t heard much positive about them. I still feel that the vibration is due to balancing, I just don’t find this dealership’s techs to be as experienced as some independent tire shops that do it day-in and day-out for many years. And this forum has informed me that my stock tires are just unbalancable when it comes to road force balancing. I wish I could drive someone’s 2018 model like my just to see if anything is different/similar. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Barak said:

So Brianibew, you’re saying 2018 and 2019 are not the same frame? How do we tell? The trucks body is exactly the same from interior perspective. GMCJoe17 - you are right about the price aspect. However, I am now only 1000 miles on this truck and I feel I am starting to get comfortable with it. Never owned a diesel so I want to explore everything but it’s never late to go back and tell them I am still experiencing it. Maybe it’s just me too little since I went from F250 to Denali, to mention that F250 was gas, rough, bumpy, etc.  and I only drove F250 for several months. I think time will tell too but based on what Brian says, I will have to comapre 2018 to 2018 in my case. Thanks all! 

Now reading you are referring to a diesel, I assume you have a 2500?  I was talking about the half tons.

Edited by Brianibew
Posted

I haven't been on this site for quite some time so I apologize for lengthy post,  I was hoping that this thread was pretty much dead and someone had found the fix for the dreaded Chevy Shake.  I'm sad to see that's not the case.  I gave up after countless hours and thousands of dollars, I replaced damn near everything underneath the truck including the drive shaft even though I knew it wasn't the issue I was desperate for a fix and it was a failed hail Mary attempt.  I followed this thread from the beginning and posted quite a bit while I was in deep trying to find a fix it this was about the same time Jesse Davidson was fighting for a buy back and traded a brand new Denali in for an F-150 at that point several competing dealerships knew about the vibration issue and were offering pennies on the dollar to trade or flat out refusing to take a GM trade in.  Basically a few trucks got fixed with tires a few with shocks a few with drive lines and a few new rear ends or swapping the factory axle shafts for a set of Yukons but they are the exceptions and the majority have an inherent design flaw that is causing a third order harmonic vibration.  Generally nth order vibrations are weak and absorbed by the mass of the machine/structure but when the input frequency matches the natural frequency of the machine/structure you have resonance and the vibration is magnified.   So here we are with another batch of consumers trying to find a fix for a problem that a fix doesn't exist and GM barely acknowledges that a problem exists I'm sure many people have been told that your truck is "operating within the GM specification for NVH" an abitrary number that didn't exist until this issue did, I feel for you guys I really do I have been there.  For anyone still trying to fix their truck because the cost to get out of it is too high, you first need to determine the frequency of the vibration you're feeling at a given speed.  At 70 MPH a 12.5 +/- hz is a first order tire and probably a balance or runout issue.  Multiply that by your rear end ratio say a 3.42 which is roughly 43+/- hz this would be a drive line that has a balance or run out issue.  Now the 38+/- HZ this is a third order tire and this is the thus far unfixable chevy shake.  The problem is that at 70 mph nothing on the truck is rotating at that angular velocity that's how you know it's a harmonic of the tire speed and there's a whole slew of parts rotating at the same angular velocity as the tires, harmonics are never a balance issue.

 

My story; I wanted out of the truck for quite a while but wasn't willing to take the financial hit, gave up trying to fix it and just dealt with it.  Vibrated like clockwork at 68 MPH plus.  I drive a lot of California freeway, speed limit is 70 on most stretches, afters 3 years I had 70k miles on the truck and the vibration had gotten worse, to the point I loathed the truck.  Add in the new issues that were popping up, leaking passenger side door seal, failed AC condenser, premature brake pad failure, the slide pins had stuck and were not allowing the inside brake pads to retract, outer pads had 60% left on them and inner pads were almost down to the rivets, return springs on the rear brakes were hitting the rotors making an awful screeching noise even though they still had about 60% of the pad left, failed navigation module, lower seat cushion would shift during turns and make a clicking sound,  last but not least the paint was peeling off of the rear drivers side door due to bad prep, you could see the imperfections in the primer coat that were causing bubbles in the base coat.  Enough was finally enough and I decided I was trading out regardless of the financial hit.  Turns out I got a trade offer that was beyond my wildest dreams and jumped ship to a competitor (I'm intentionally not mentioning the brand to spare the haters the need to mention all the issues I'm going to have with  __________ <---enter brand here) because they know a guy that bought one and the truck went rogue and castrated him in his sleep, then murdered his family exploded and burned the whole house to the ground.  The fact of the matter all mfg's have their issues and all have their fanbois that will defend their brand to the death.  I'll take my chances with another manufacture having issues and trying to fix them versus giving GM my money and having an issue that they haven't corrected in 5 years of production and barely acknowledge.  Loyalty is earned not given and GM has done nothing in its history to earn anyone's loyalty, the few on here who have gotten buy backs had to fight tooth and nail to get them and even then GM tried to screw them.

 

To anyone reading this that has the dreaded shake.  I feel for you and if you find yourself driving at those speeds often ask yourself what your sanity is worth and just dump the POS if you can with the new GM platform out now you can bet there is no attention being paid to this issue from GM.  Their customer care hotline is a joke don't waste your time, I was told they were working on it an anticipated a fix in a few months, over 3 years later and nothing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Off topic a bit;  but, I’ll post anyway.  Apparently, Trump is going to allow E15 gas to be sold everywhere.   Wondering how this will affect 6.2L engines.  I believe they’re only rated for E10 gas.

Posted

Brianibew - yes my is Duramax Denali HD which is same as Duramax 2500 HD. I did see that Sierra 1500s was the trucks mostly affected but after I watched a you tube video of a post with 1500 Sierra and bottle of water shaking in center counsel, I started getting nervous about my truck, however, I had since tested a bottle and sunglasses in my and there is nothing compared to what I saw in you tube video post. My is generally coming from rear end and I still feel just poor balancing and/or the fact that lots have posted about goodyear wranglers not being able to road force balance. I just got 1100 miles on the truck and will continue to monitor but since dealership let out some air from rear tires it definitely changed the shake/vibration and it’s less now. So I would like to find out others that may have had similar case but strictly with sierra 2500/denali HDs not 1500s. Thanks!

Posted

Yep saw this video and my doesn’t do the same when having a bottle of water in front center console. Again it would be cool to get in a truck that also vibrates to really compare and determine ifan issue exists. 

Posted

Very happy to report I received a call from the service manager today, they really did send the data to GM and GM told them to go ahead and replace the Ring and Pinion in the rear end. He said they should order and have the parts in and installed by early next week. This is great news and means they are still actively chasing the trouble. Way to go! my Chevy Dealer for keeping the promise of correcting this issue. I really hope this corrects it! 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
    • $2.20 E-85 down from $2.59 Around $3.80 for regular and about $5 on average for Premium.  Propane $3.99 a gallon. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...