Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

tbarn, do you happen to know what the P/N is for replacing the radio module? This might help us with a '13 build go to dealers and let them know what needs to be fixed. Plus the update of course

My truck - 8/13 build has a radio p/n of 13591992 Another truck, build 6/14 has p/n 13592804. Mine supersedes to the later number. What anyone can extrapolate from that I don't know. part numbers change all the time and for many reasons. There ya go. Use the info as you wish.

Posted

Well I finally had my truck out on a longer drive since all of my work with the engineers. While my city reception was a lot better since the update my country reception is still lacking as well. HD was switching in and out the entire trip to my parents who are only 35 miles from me (I live in Norman OK, they live in Tecumseh OK) where on the same drive my wifes Lincoln MKX does just fine.

 

Still leads me to believe there is a reception issues in this system, it is a lot weaker than the previous generation trucks for sure.

TJay, did you happen to get anywhere with iBiquity and replacing the coax cable? I was reading a thread about how one of the directors said the coax cable needed to be replaced because the ends weren't coated properly and allowing interference. Davis1 mentioned that you had been in contact with iBiquity. Was this fix ever attempted?

Posted

I was never in contact with them, that was another member that did that are the beginning of the thread.

Posted

Sorry they told me they were working with another guy, when they forwarded it to Detroit office,just assumed it was you when BRuss asked me. Carry on.

Posted

No problem.

 

I did get an email back from the engineers. They said the new PI now has module replacement in it that will be released soon. They also said they are still working on the reception issue but gave me no time frame or what GM will do if the repair is not something the infotainment system will be able to handle or not. My guess and this is purely an assumption is GM will get it fixed for the 2015 trucks and it will be entirely new parts that wont be cross compatible and the 2014 may not end up with a fix. I hope not but based on some things the testing engineers told me I don't have high hopes.

Posted

The news that came out recently stating that 2015 GM trucks will not have HD Radio is disturbing. Leads me to believe that they have no fix for the reception issues and have instead just given up.

Posted

Thanks for the follow up, TJay! Any chance you can let us all know what the new PI number is when its released? Maybe tbarn can also help with this? At this point, some fix is better than no fix at all.

Posted

Another PI dated Aug. 7 Says if you don't like HD radio cutting out on weaker stations, turn it off. Normal

Posted

tbarn, why so negative?! :P If the engineers aren't lying to TJay, I hope not, then there should be a new PI in the next couple weeks.

Posted (edited)

Why would they release the first PI if it really didn't fix anything?

 

Edit: shouldn't they go out and test it first?

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted

I will tell you in the new software update that you now have the ability to turn off the HD and it stay off. Leads me to think this is GM's answer and the details on the new PI that was just posted almost confirm it. "Customer complains of HD dropping", GM/Dealer - Tell customer it is normal and if they don't like it turn off HD.

 

Sad, every other manufacture has HD on their vehicles with no issues. Sounds like the lowest bidder vendor GM used for the infotainment system sucks and GM thinks this is the most cost effective answer.

 

I can tell you right now, if GM cant get this fixed on my truck I will push and pursue it down the road up to and including a buy back of the truck if I have to, I cant believe the corp answer is to change programming and tell the customer to deal with it. That is the whole issue that has gotten them in trouble with the ignition switches. Do the right thing, hold the vendor accountable..!!!

Posted

I will tell you in the new software update that you now have the ability to turn off the HD and it stay off. Leads me to think this is GM's answer and the details on the new PI that was just posted almost confirm it. "Customer complains of HD dropping", GM/Dealer - Tell customer it is normal and if they don't like it turn off HD.

 

Sad, every other manufacture has HD on their vehicles with no issues. Sounds like the lowest bidder vendor GM used for the infotainment system sucks and GM thinks this is the most cost effective answer.

 

I can tell you right now, if GM cant get this fixed on my truck I will push and pursue it down the road up to and including a buy back of the truck if I have to, I cant believe the corp answer is to change programming and tell the customer to deal with it. That is the whole issue that has gotten them in trouble with the ignition switches. Do the right thing, hold the vendor accountable..!!!

I have a 2014 GMC Denali and the reception is horrible. I think we all need to get together and push back at GM to do something already.

Posted

if this is fixed for the 2015 systems, wouldn't swapping the 2014 system for the 2015 system fix the problem? I would assume for the most part, that either version should work in either truck, just some different hardware installed?

Posted

I will tell you in the new software update that you now have the ability to turn off the HD and it stay off. Leads me to think this is GM's answer and the details on the new PI that was just posted almost confirm it. "Customer complains of HD dropping", GM/Dealer - Tell customer it is normal and if they don't like it turn off HD.

 

Sad, every other manufacture has HD on their vehicles with no issues. Sounds like the lowest bidder vendor GM used for the infotainment system sucks and GM thinks this is the most cost effective answer.

 

I can tell you right now, if GM cant get this fixed on my truck I will push and pursue it down the road up to and including a buy back of the truck if I have to, I cant believe the corp answer is to change programming and tell the customer to deal with it. That is the whole issue that has gotten them in trouble with the ignition switches. Do the right thing, hold the vendor accountable..!!!

Buy back, wow for the radio. Everybody thought I was "LOCO" when I mentioned a buy back for a guy that they are going to tear the motor apart and put new rings in it.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/163701-burning-oil-2014/

  • Like 1
Posted

Buy back, wow for the radio. Everybody thought I was "LOCO" when I mentioned a buy back for a guy that they are going to tear the motor apart and put new rings in it.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/163701-burning-oil-2014/

 

I will too. Just talking to the wife about my POS radio. I am NOT going to own this truck for X amount of years with a radio as mickey mouse as the one we're stuck with. "Don't like it turn it off", what a lame fix. This is a bunch of bulls**.That's not what we paid good money for.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...