Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've had the recent update and I still get distortion. More so on certain stations. Stations are fine on my other vehicles so idk what the distinction is about the hd radio. Dash speakers sound too high pitched with feedback, static. Even with treble low.

Posted (edited)

I need your advise. I own a 2014 SLE Truck. I too have been disappointed by the HD Radio. I have been told by Autonatjon of GMC in Memphis that the radio will lose the signal due to the lack of repeaters in the area. Now another issue has surfaced. I own over 3000 cd tittles. They are all store bought. However the cd player plays the music but does not display the title or track information. Could Gm not have designed a better radio player? I almost ready to purchase another radio.

Edited by [email protected]
Posted

The radio is not the only thing that determines if the track info from the CD shows, the CD has to be encoded with the track info as well.

Posted

TJay In an earlier post you wrote the next update may address the HVAC issues on remote start. Does this mean they are looking to make the seats actually heat on high under remote start? My truck goes in for the radio update 2/25 . Thank you for helping with all the issues.

Posted

I doubt it, the HVAC issues are separate completely. I only mentioned that I said something to the engineer about the HVAC operation on this truck compared to prev GM vehicles.

Posted

I had new radio installed in mine and the other service bulletins done, radio is OK I am not a big listerner to anything but talk radio etc. Every once in a while I have radio fade on AM and FM on music channels or talk radio and I hit menu and the radio has gone back into HD mode, I turn it off radio is OK for days sometimes weeks then out of know where it will activate the HD again and things drift till I turn it off???

Posted

I have a 2014 that can't hold a station either. A note to those who think theirs is working.. it seems as though static is not bad.. just HD keeps dropping out.. Very annoying once you key into it..

Posted

I posted this in a separate thread but I will post here as well..
I recently picked up a 2015 Silverado LT, and I am having issues with my Pandora now. I got my truck and phone paired up without any issues. However when I go to play anything on Pandora it works fine, then all of a sudden will start skipping.

To me, it seems like it is buffering and the music just pauses, then starts up again. It really is annoying to say the least. So I tried using my USB cable to see if that stopped the problem. Nope. still does it. Then I had another friend refer me to the music app spotify. So I downloaded that and tried using that, and I am getting the same issue.

I have a good friend who works at Chevrolet and he told me there is no new updates for the silverados, and they have not heard of the same issue going on. Am I the only one, or is there other individuals experiencing the same issue?

Posted

I posted this in a separate thread but I will post here as well..

I recently picked up a 2015 Silverado LT, and I am having issues with my Pandora now. I got my truck and phone paired up without any issues. However when I go to play anything on Pandora it works fine, then all of a sudden will start skipping.

 

To me, it seems like it is buffering and the music just pauses, then starts up again. It really is annoying to say the least. So I tried using my USB cable to see if that stopped the problem. Nope. still does it. Then I had another friend refer me to the music app spotify. So I downloaded that and tried using that, and I am getting the same issue.

 

I have a good friend who works at Chevrolet and he told me there is no new updates for the silverados, and they have not heard of the same issue going on. Am I the only one, or is there other individuals experiencing the same issue?

 

I've had this issue with Pandora lately too. I'm not aware of any changes to the iPhone and I haven't had my truck in for any kind of service yet.

 

...as for the FM reception - I'm surprised so many people are having problems. I live in Texas and pickup FM stations from both LA and NYC. <confused>

 

^^lol

Posted

I have a work truck model with the base radio and I have the exact same issue. The 2013 I traded in for this new body style had no issues what so ever with tuning in my favorite FM stations. Since buying this truck I constantly loose stations or I get static on a regular basis. I took it to the dealer and they claimed there was nothing wrong with it. LOL

 

If anyone has a solution let me know.

 

Rick

Posted

Today now I have had many issues at all with my Pandora or Spotify. I haven't changed anything on my phone, or the car. I was actually going to take the truck into the dealership to get looked at, but since it was working, I decided to leave it be, until I have issues again.

Posted

I've had the same issues with my fm and hd reception. The dealer hooked it to the computer and now it's actually worse. I will be going back in for an oil change soon and see what they do with it then.

Posted

I have a 2014 HC with 20k miles on it. Took mine in for radio issues and was told GM is aware with no fix. Well for $53k I can get a loaded Ford FX4 with a working radio. I'm about to make the switch if GM doesn't get off their ASS and fix this. Add to my list the vibration at 70 mph as well.....geez....Ford's warranty isn't better but who cares when my Chevy is in the shop every other month with no fix...

Posted

hmmmm... and all this time I thought the crummy radio was just normal. I'll add this to the list of things to take up with my dealer.

Posted

It's definitely a HD issue.. and will drive you wacky.. shame shame gm.. how many f'ing years have you made radio's and know you drop this terd on us for 50k... not happy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...