Jump to content

Assist Steps / Running Boards / Nerf Bars

Cholt2322

By Cholt2322
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TruckDaddy said:

I sort of disagree.  Both have pros and cons.  The problem with frame mount is that they require longer brackets and thus cause more stress on the frame.  Rocker mount has shorter brackets and are fine as long as the brackets are well made.  The most common type of mount is rocker panel and I've never really heard of anyone tearing off their step bars from the mount.

We just think different.

Frame mount running boards won't hurt a frame IMO. A hitch is attached to the frame. 

Rocker mount. Make a mistake and catch a board on something and the rocker panel can be damaged. In areas of salt use the bolts into the rocker panel is a trap for rust.

:happysad:

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

weagle99
weagle99

I installed Amp Research Power Steps on my GMT900 recently and will never own another truck without them.

anthony2558
anthony2558

N-Fab wheel to wheel.   Tapatalk via Moto X    

mzodarg
mzodarg

Pics of my truck with the AMP power step.    

Posted Images

TruckDaddy Enthusiast

TruckDaddy

Posted
Posted

You realize that the brackets are not really attached to the rocker panel?  They are attached to a steel beam that's underneath the doors.  They're no more subject to rust that the frame.

Bigfoot16 Enthusiast

Bigfoot16

Posted
Posted
On 10/12/2017 at 5:54 PM, berteras said:

Looking to buy a set of amp steps for my 2017 1500.  It currently only has a 2" level but I plan on lifting the truck next year so wanted to just buy them now.  Is anyone running these on a 2" level?  I'm just curious as to how low they drop down when they are in the down position.  

I have a 2.5 level kit on mine and have AMP step. (wife demanded.. she is 5'3")  they are not too low when they deploy.. I'm 6'4" and I find myself using them just to reduce any rub on my leather seats...

RigPig Enthusiast

RigPig

Posted
Posted

I was under my 2018 All Terrain this week and found that half the bolts to the tubular steps on the passenger side were missing.

Each bracket calls for two bolts and they had only installed one per bracket, which caused some serious flexing issues.

Wonder if the trucks are transported to the dealer without the bars installed and the dealer installs them once the truck is delivered?

Truck has approx. 150 miles on the odometer.

slj2008 Senior Enthusiast

slj2008

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, RigPig said:

I was under my 2018 All Terrain this week and found that half the bolts to the tubular steps on the passenger side were missing.

Each bracket calls for two bolts and they had only installed one per bracket, which caused some serious flexing issues.

Wonder if the trucks are transported to the dealer without the bars installed and the dealer installs them once the truck is delivered?

Truck has approx. 150 miles on the odometer.

Take it back to the dealership and have them fix it ???? YOU PAY GOOD MONEY for them . I seen some come with running broads , off the transport truck , Dealer / customer order it .

RigPig Enthusiast

RigPig

Posted
Posted

My thoughts exactly. The only issue is that the dealer only has one (1) bolt in stock.:uhoh:

Probably why half the bolts weren't installed.

grizz_wi Enthusiast

grizz_wi

Posted
Posted

Ordered the Havoc HS2 for my 1500, got sent the HS2 for a 2014-2017 HD 2500-3500 anyone know if they will fit before I unpack them. Realtruck.com sucks, will see how they handle this....

Sierra_Kayaker Enthusiast

Sierra_Kayaker

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 6/11/2017 at 4:10 PM, Nolasaintz said:

I recently installed Havoc HS2 bars. A little more step area compared to N-Fab. Very solid too.post-141393-149721540726_thumb.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

post-141393-149721540726_thumb.jpg

post-141393-149721540726_thumb.jpg

post-141393-149721540726_thumb.jpg


Can you or someone else with the Havoc HS2's tell me how wide those steps are? looks like about 12 inches or so, right? My wife is wanting to make sure she can stand with both feet on them when putting our kids in the back seat. These look like a great alternative to the expensive new OEM black hoop steps.

Edited by Sierra_Kayaker
  • 3 weeks later...
techsan15 Enthusiast

techsan15

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2017 at 2:12 PM, sk said:

 

GM doesn't make Amp style steps. The new ones from GM only come "out" not "out and down" like the Amps. And there are many threads on here where it was determined they can't be retrofitted to existing trucks without a LOT of custom programming to the BCM.

 

But to answer your question -- no I don't have a part number.

Here's to your "many threads where it was determined they can't be retrofitted"

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
FSU1985 Enthusiast

FSU1985

Posted
Posted

Hey guys, new here I’m looking to buy a set of havoc hs2’s for 2017 double cab!

 

Im located in south Florida...let me know!

DBAC5DAD-6C08-43D8-B5C8-02ADBE5813FC.jpeg

Brian2015 Enthusiast

Brian2015

Posted
Posted

Very disappointed with the NFAB nerf bars. Not only did they start to rust after a year (and I don't drive my truck in salty conditions, I have a beater car for that), but I cut a corner too tight and clipped a landscaping boulder which bent the brackets like pipe cleaners. The nerf bars crushed the rocker panel, cab corner and bed corner. $2800 damage.  I really liked the way they looked but if your shoe size is larger than a men's size 9, its hard to get good firm traction on the step, especially when they're wet.

 

 

20160423_143850.jpg

granite861 Enthusiast

granite861

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just curious if anyone else is using the Laverne side entry steps/running boards?  Ive had a set on my previous truck and have a black powder coated set on the truck I have now. I am very happy with them as they provide so much protection from rocks and other road debris. No gap between the truck and running boards. They are kinda old school as they completedly cover the side and rocker panels. 

Edited by granite861
XSKIER Enthusiast

XSKIER

Posted
Posted

Like these?

71e512706b9a44d4f63d6fa3d5ca9a9a.jpg

Or like these?

c3195853b1bf39d04a78b696b2cd9bc9.jpg

I really like the protection of the ones on the 98, and I like the look of the ones on the 17. I don't like any variations of tube step or power step.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

granite861 Enthusiast

granite861

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, XSKIER said:

Like these?

71e512706b9a44d4f63d6fa3d5ca9a9a.jpg

Or like these?

c3195853b1bf39d04a78b696b2cd9bc9.jpg

I really like the protection of the ones on the 98, and I like the look of the ones on the 17. I don't like any variations of tube step or power step.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

Yes, They are like the set in the bottom pic except all black. The chrome set you show is what I had on my previous truck. These provide excellent protection for the body in my opinion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • tjonesdfw
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By tjonesdfw · Posted

      Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • GMCustomerService
      Electrical problem

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...