Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The first issue is the puddle/domelight's. I first noticed the issue when the puddle lights were flickering when the unlock button was pushed or the door was opened. Also, the interior dome lights would not come on when the door was opened. I've pushed the overhead switch to the on position and sometimes they would flash on quickly and shut off, but most of the time not come on at all. The dome lights come on when the individual buttons are pushed, but not at all with the overhead switch. Anyone know where the fuse is that controls the overhead switch?

 

My second issue is with the left turn signal. On the DIC I got a turn indicator failure for the left rear. The indications are with the blinker activation, the mirror/dash blinker lights will flash normal for about three seconds and then pulse quickly, followed by DIC message. *edit* Brake lights (left) also don't activate.

 

I took the truck in today and got it diagnosed. The diode mod, performed exactly like the steps in this forum, somehow shorted out my BCM. I can't believe that would have done it, considering several other things that BCM controls work without issue. Well, new BCM and programming repair will cost one $675 dollars, all because I forgot to take out the damn diode before going to the dealership. Hard life lessons.

 

sidenote: I also performed the footwell lights modification and I'm certain this somehow factored into the equation.

 

I just removed the bcm and there are no chared areas or visible broken solders. If the bcm shorted out, wouldn't I be able to see something on the circuit board? Can any trained eyes spot any areas of interest where I can snap a closer photo to post.

 

With everyone who has had zero issues with the diode mod, I find it hard to believe this is the case. I think they saw the mod and blamed it all on that right away.

 

Should I even take it as far as to say per the magnuson warranty act, in order for them to decline warranty coverage, they have to prove the diode caused the failures?

 

Financially, what could that lead to in further costs for me, or will they not want to hassle and potentially just fix it? The entire BCM looks unaffected

.

post-142734-0-07610200-1465914395_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-49472800-1465914439_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-07610200-1465914395_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-49472800-1465914439_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-07610200-1465914395_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-49472800-1465914439_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-07610200-1465914395_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-49472800-1465914439_thumb.jpeg

Posted

Your modifying of a wiring circuit to alter its function would not be a Mag-Moss deal. That is more pertaining to say, a Magnaflow catback, a Volant intake, aftermarket wheels, tires, etc. You have altered a wiring harness.

Posted

This is the diagnosis. With that wording in my file, will that affect future warranty work?

post-142734-0-71464900-1465915360_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-71464900-1465915360_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-71464900-1465915360_thumb.jpeg

post-142734-0-71464900-1465915360_thumb.jpeg

Posted

This is the diagnosis. With that wording in my file, will that affect future warranty work?

 

For 3yr/36k issues? Most likely. Powertrain may be unaffected. Over 30 DTC's? ...Wow...

Posted

Could be used as a reason to void all ECM networked electrical system and vehicle accessories containing solid state components.

 

All electrical systems switching/monitoring are controlled by the ECM within its CPUs internal pathways smaller than a human hair and susceptible to external damage not visible on the external circuit board. A momentary short caused by touching the diode or a wire to the wrong exposed pin(s) even for a fraction of a second could cause such damage. All the GM electrical accessories I've installed in my vehicles Silverado sports bar, bed lights, Camaro fog lights, etc. have always included either a new or replacement wiring harness to add the accessory or function, never splicing into existing wiring or messing with exposed pins.

 

Shouldn't affect mechanical components or drive train hardware.

 

Unfortunately, other than the remote chance of finding a good a used ECM from the same model, year vehicle with the same accessories which should be plug and play any replacement part you purchase will require dealer reprogramming anyway. So, you might have to pay the devil his due and have the dealer replace and restore the warranty on future electrical work. Wouldn't drive it too long in it's present state because there may be other engine control circuits within the ECM's CPU that were weakened or compromised which could fail at any moment and leave you stranded.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

People don't seem to understand the complexity of these newer vehicles. They are now integrated systems controlled by application specific "computers". You modify something and it could easily cause a ripple effect. I'm sorry about your problems, but it's the risk you take with custom mods.

 

Like the previous poster said, I'd probably bite the bullet and have the dealer make the repairs back to stock if they'll guarantee that they'll honor the warranty in the future.

Edited by Black03Yukon
  • Like 1
Posted

As a software developer and electrical engineer, in layman's terms, a IC doesn't have to let the magic smoke out in order to fail. I've seen countless MCUs and other ICs act wonky due to internal shorts and resistance that can only be detected on an o-scope or other test tool. I once spent about a week chasing an intermittent code bug that turned out to be a bad batch of MCUs enabling output pins even with the software disabling them.

 

The purpose of the mod is to allow one circuit to turn on another. The use of a diode here is to cause current to flow in one direction only; one circuit turns on the other, but does not allow the inverse. However, not all diodes are created equal in terms of efficiency in doing that, especially for initial surges, so leak back can cause havoc. Not saying that's what happened here, but its the first thing that comes to mind.

  • Like 2
Posted

True. And don't forget that you're now driving two circuits on an output that was only designed to drive one. We don't know the specs on the driver, but it could easily be a contributor.

Posted

Thanks. All good responses. Certainly will be returning for repairs. No mention was ever said to me about voiding a warranty, however clearly a concern. I won't be performing the mod again, considering I could have bought some really good lights for a better improvement than the simple fogs provided coming on with highs.

Posted

Yep. This is why I won't do anything but drive mine. I even have my dealer do oil changes. This way, if ever a problem I can tell them your the only ones who have touched it. Good luck!

  • Like 1
Posted

Its a risk we all take when we mod or tune. The saying goes...you gotta pay to play !. I along with many have done these mods...no issues yet..I did not use diodes..just jumper wires. I feel your $$pain..but the true mistake was not removing the diode before going in for electrical issues. Goodluck.

Posted

Its a risk we all take when we mod or tune. The saying goes...you gotta pay to play !. I along with many have done these mods...no issues yet..I did not use diodes..just jumper wires. I feel your $$pain..but the true mistake was not removing the diode before going in for electrical issues. Goodluck.

And people here complain that the dealers are lying, thieving, good for nothing jerks...

  • Like 7
Posted

it would be simple enough to come up with a low cost driver module to do the heavy lifting of driving the extra relay. Maybe something like a 2N2222, config it like a saturated switch, power and ground, an enclosure...

 

Sent from my SM-T817V using Tapatalk

Posted

Wait. You soldered a diode on to a $600 board just to have fogs when your high beams are on? I have never heard of this mod and judging by your experience i do not intend to perform. Light output is just fine for my wallet. lol. Thanks for posting this warning to those of us who had not heard of this.

 

A really nice LED bar behind the grill for that money!

Posted

First, a LED bar is illegal to have on while driving on the road. The diode was never soldered on. It simply pushes up in the harness plug. There's a few threads on here about it. I've had mine in with no issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...