Jump to content

E85 in the 4.3 Ecotec3, Yes or No?


tim5779

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey fellas.  New to the site.  Just picked up a new 2017 Sierra 4.3 Ecotec3 a few weeks ago.  As you can see by the pic, I wasted no time in sprucing her up.

 

I did a ton of research on this new V6 prior to buying, and decided to give it a try.

 

Anyway...Ive read alot (mostly from GM sources) talking about the performance benefits with with using E85 in this particular engine.  The numbers are impressive, but I remain skeptical.  Everything I've ever been told about Ethanol in flex fuel motors, is "stay away".  The long term damage on metal components just isnt worth it.  But I'm being led to believe that is no longer an issue with this new V6?  Open to any and all suggestions.  Keep in mind, MPG is not a factor.  My drive to work is 8 miles, and E85 here in Indy is a full $1 cheaper than unleaded per gallon.

20180120_161830.jpg

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Grats on the rig my friend! She is sharp!! I can't speak for the 4.3 performance per say but can say if you plan on using your truck for a truck, your gonna wish you had went for the 5.3. 

Posted

Nah...I've had V8's my whole life.  The decision to go with the 4.3 was really a matter of price.  This was the only 2017 they had left on the lot.  Sticker was 44k, and I took her home for 28k...couldn't pass that up.  I pull a 5×8 trailer with a quad, and haul firewood and lumber occasionally, so at the end of the day, when a deal like that comes along, it makes you think about how you really use the truck, and do you REALLY need a V8.  This 4.3 should be more than enough for the work I need it to do.

Posted

Does your truck have the "flex fuel"  decal? If not, you shouldn't run e-85. At least that was the way the 15 and 16's were.

Posted

Don't run it all the time but here and there won't do any damage.

Posted
6 hours ago, Colossus said:

Don't run it all the time but here and there won't do any damage.

Why do you say that? Owner's manual actually encourages the use of E85 if the vehicle is equipped (yellow gas cap} and also states it's not recommended to switch back and forth frequently. :thumbs: 

Posted

Thanks Don!  oh and FYI Guys....2017 and up no longer have a gas cap (gas cap free, spring loaded port instead).  But, the window sticker clearly states "E85 flex fuel vehicle".

Posted
7 minutes ago, tim5779 said:

Thanks Don!  oh and FYI Guys....2017 and up no longer have a gas cap (gas cap free, spring loaded port instead).  But, the window sticker clearly states "E85 flex fuel vehicle".

If its a flex fuel then I would run it. these engines really aren't designed to run on 87 octane and you will notice the difference running E85 as they run so much better. I run it in my 2010 all the time unless I have a road trip planned. The mpg is horrible though, I think I'm down to 290 or so miles to a tank but I do let my truck warm up pretty much every morning, been colder than normal here in sc 

Posted

Your welcome. Forgot about the gas cap on the 17's and up. The stickers are good. I would go for it with a price difference that big

Posted
11 minutes ago, tim5779 said:

Thanks fellas.  I'm about due for a tank so, I think I'll try it out.

make sure to read the manual on the procedure for the switch over. my truck has to be driven at least 7 miles on the switch over for the sensors to pick up ethanol content. once that happens you will feel the difference

Posted
make sure to read the manual on the procedure for the switch over. my truck has to be driven at least 7 miles on the switch over for the sensors to pick up ethanol content. once that happens you will feel the difference
Read, but dont get hung up on the procedure.

With the varied alcohol to gasoline content of most flex fuel, you will likely find that you rarely get a true e-85, as "Flex Fuel" can be anywhere from 51% to 85%...it should be marked on the pump.

I'm completely converted to "Flex Fuel" now, and I'm only at 66% alcohol. It should go back up during the summer if things hold...these modern Flex Fuel vehicles don't care what percentage you run, they adjust on the fly. These trucks do report alcohol content, you need just need a way to reading it...I can see it through my Edge Insight. That's why I say not to worry about following the manual, you don't need to run the tank low to switch over.

The ECM doesn't make a determination to alcohol content for about seven to eight miles. And contrary to Internet lore, the system routinely samples the alcohol content in fuel anytime the truck is running, and adjusts as necessary; not just after you fill up. Mine will change everyday...

When they do finally make a determination to the content, they immediately run/feel different. If you have a catch can, watch it closely as they tend to fill up with water fast.

Steve
2012 2500hd 6.0l

Posted
1 hour ago, bgbdwlf2500 said:

If its a flex fuel then I would run it. these engines really aren't designed to run on 87 octane and you will notice the difference running E85 as they run so much better. I run it in my 2010 all the time unless I have a road trip planned. The mpg is horrible though, I think I'm down to 290 or so miles to a tank but I do let my truck warm up pretty much every morning, been colder than normal here in sc 

So you've ran E85 for 8 years and haven't seen any negative affects on the fuel system?  Or did you just begin to run it recently?

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If anyone lands here looking for an update - the problem wasnt with the hose, the clamp, etc... I purchased a metal Thermostat housing that just must not of been made to spec. It just wouldn't plug up the hose.. Went back to a plastic cheap housing - leak fixed. Some plumbers tape carefully placed in tandem with a clamp likely would've gotten the job done.   Best,
    • For anyone following, this is what I have deduced from this forum - and my very specific niche case. Please do let me know if you see me going in the wrong direction here. For context, I have a 16 sierra 1500 w/t. Has TC and Cargo light switches. Removed the switch to find the X1 and X2 of the S48A connection populated with wires (x1 10-14, and x2 1-5).   Took photos of the X61A-X5 to find the wires from S48A-X1 land here at their respective pins (10, 11, 17, 23 on the X5). Was hopeful that this means my X51A fuse box has the appropriate pins... No cigar. So now I will be routing wires from the rear of the X61A-X1 to the engine bay and to their respective negative relay triggers. Please see to the diagram. If any has insight as to where the S48A-X2 pins 4 and 5 land that would be awesome.   Note: please disregard fuse sizes. Main fuse will like be 25A, all mini bus fuses will likely be 10-15A   Cheers
    • 287,500 Mile Service   8/13/2026   Reset Fuel Trims   Since the work done in the previous post there was a good improvement in response in all areas except right after a fill up where the LTFT would go -20%+ for about four miles while the STFT was near neutral. Before the work they both went very negative for a few miles after a fill up but act normal thereafter.    We did a systems check of the vapor recovery system for functionality and ability to hold a vacuum. That checked out fine. But this doesn't mean the charcoal canister is dead in the water. Testing that is next up. For now the reset of the fuel trims.    I intentionally shorted the fill exactly two gallons to eliminate any chance of filling the canister. On start up the trims were behaving normally until I got up and rolling where the LTFT went -10 / -11%% but the short was + 2 to 0%. Within a mile the the STFT offset the LTFT and by 2 miles they were neutral. HUGE improvement but still not hunky-dory.    I'll watch them for a few days. Perhaps another tank where I will fill completely to 'first click' and compare. Meanwhile on the hunt for a new canister and I'll toss another purge value at it for good measure. Pending the outcome of the canister test that is. Progress of any kind is welcome.    Fuel economy improvement with bringing hole #3 back to the living was a noticeable bump to the positive. Even on the few miles I drove after the refill I already see another bump up by the trims reset.     She's purring like a kitten with a warm bowl of milk.    BTW, adding 50 rpm to the idle took the majority of the negative timing out on cold start up and leaned the cold idle. No longer burbles in the cat. What a dumb way to heat a cat.      
    • Yeah, shame I can’t really get that filter easily anymore. Running a PureOne. Your fave!    TAN would be neat to see. Confirmation I ran it too long probably. 🤣
    • My son and I both bought new trucks in 2017. Both of us immediately put Truck Covers USA American Roll Covers on our trucks. My son still has his truck and it never sees the inside of a garage. We live in Alabama, so not much snow. My truck was my daily driver and was in the garage when I wasn't driving it or at work. No issues with either cover even after almost 9 years. About a year ago I sold my truck to my brother and bought a 2025 Silverado 2500. The second thing that I put on that truck was a new Truck Covers USA cover. They are very well made and have a very positive locking system. I looked at a Retrax and my concern was the way that the cover locked to the rail. BTW, the first thing I put on the new truck was step bars. Those new trucks are high!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...