Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

Lots of constraints for 2021 production at least to start off the first few months.  GM is doing a "focused order" system on them to get popular option trucks on the ground.  CGN spray on liner is a constrainted item as well so your dealer is correct in telling you such.  

 

2021 model year is going to make some weird optioned trucks for a bit.  

 

Yep, that's the way my dealer explained as well - numerous options constrained for some trims and configurations. Guess that means some possibility of the Multipro and spray-in coming available again for DCs at some point? I don't know how long such constraints tend to last, do you?

 

At any rate, I really wanted truck now, and I was somewhat flexible (DC diesel w/ X31 in Cayenne were my must haves), so for the moment, pretty happy if my truck shows up as expected, albeit without the Multipro and spray-in. I will be one of the quirky 21s, i guess. ?

Posted
1 hour ago, James Euler said:

Yep, that's the way my dealer explained as well - numerous options constrained for some trims and configurations. Guess that means some possibility of the Multipro and spray-in coming available again for DCs at some point? I don't know how long such constraints tend to last, do you?

 

At any rate, I really wanted truck now, and I was somewhat flexible (DC diesel w/ X31 in Cayenne were my must haves), so for the moment, pretty happy if my truck shows up as expected, albeit without the Multipro and spray-in. I will be one of the quirky 21s, i guess. ?

 

 

On average its 6-8 weeks but can go more or less.  

Posted
On 10/24/2020 at 10:28 PM, James Euler said:

I jumped in last month and placed an order for a 21 Double Cab, motivated to move now because it seemed the choices for Double Cab trims and options were getting fewer every day.

 

I picked an SLE, the only other available trim besides the Elevation if I wanted a Double Cab, and loaded it up, including Multipro Tailgate and spray-in bed liner.

 

Dealer called me yesterday and told me order was "not accepted" by GM. Seems they've got too many trucks to build, and not enough parts and supplier support. So they are *not* offering the Multipro or the spray-in bed liner on Double Cabs. They are saving those options for the Crew Cab upper trim levels.

 

I realize the bed liner is no big deal - i can get that added from a dozen different sources. The Multipro, I'm just out of luck. But what I am really surprised at is that the Double Cab is so apparently unpopular.

 

So who loves the Double Cab? To my eye, it is easily the best looking config - all the proportions are spot on. And you can get a full-size bed! And what I really like is that it is an individual setup, kinda like a two-door sports car: you get a Double Cab when it's a truck just for you and your gear (and sometimes your plus one). And isn't that really what the pickup truck is all about? The iconic lone cowboy? A man and his truck (and maybe a dog)? I've always thought that, but that is apparently the minority opinion.

 

Enlighten me.

 

`19 DC SLT here, you're preaching to the choir brother. Been trying to educate the masses around here for a while now but the sad truth is, most people are uninformed. Plenty of people who never give it a second thought, don't really even know they have the option. Seems like GM is ready to totally do away with DC's entirely for this very reason. The simple truth is trucks are far too fashionably popular nowadays and the average consumer isn't worried about a foot and a half here or a foot and a half there, they simply want the status symbol. Nothing more utilitarian being built these days vehicle wise than a 4wd half ton DC with a removable camper shell. Literally the best of all worlds.

 

If you don't have 4 grown adults in your vehicle a majority of the time, there is zero rationale for not owning a double cab. 

Posted
 

 
If you don't have 4 grown adults in your vehicle a majority of the time, there is zero rationale for not owning a double cab. 


I used to agree with you but, then I had a baby and those rear facing car seats don’t fit in a double cab unless your passenger wants to ride with their knees on the dash! To me 6 ft beds are almost as useless as 5 ft beds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, superhighsierra said:

 

`19 DC SLT here, you're preaching to the choir brother. Been trying to educate the masses around here for a while now but the sad truth is, most people are uninformed. Plenty of people who never give it a second thought, don't really even know they have the option. Seems like GM is ready to totally do away with DC's entirely for this very reason. The simple truth is trucks are far too fashionably popular nowadays and the average consumer isn't worried about a foot and a half here or a foot and a half there, they simply want the status symbol. Nothing more utilitarian being built these days vehicle wise than a 4wd half ton DC with a removable camper shell. Literally the best of all worlds.

 

If you don't have 4 grown adults in your vehicle a majority of the time, there is zero rationale for not owning a double cab. 

Well said.

Posted
3 hours ago, Imcrazy said:

 


I used to agree with you but, then I had a baby and those rear facing car seats don’t fit in a double cab unless your passenger wants to ride with their knees on the dash! To me 6 ft beds are almost as useless as 5 ft beds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Those baby seats are a whole 'nother thing, for sure. That's when I gave up my beloved Silverado DC, some twenty years ago. But I'm soon to cure that loss.

 

Two important things that fit nicely in a 6 (and a half!) foot bed, but not in a 5 foot bed: me, lying down, and any of my bicycles, standing up. And there's scads of stuff that fits much better: stack of 8' studs, sheet goods (you've got a solid 8 feet with the tailgate down), more boxes of anything (tile, flooring, etc).

 

But that's my world. I'm sure you're digging your Z71 CC.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, James Euler said:

Those baby seats are a whole 'nother thing, for sure. That's when I gave up my beloved Silverado DC, some twenty years ago. But I'm soon to cure that loss.

 

Two important things that fit nicely in a 6 (and a half!) foot bed, but not in a 5 foot bed: me, lying down, and any of my bicycles, standing up. And there's scads of stuff that fits much better: stack of 8' studs, sheet goods (you've got a solid 8 feet with the tailgate down), more boxes of anything (tile, flooring, etc).

 

But that's my world. I'm sure you're digging your Z71 CC.

I'm with you on the 6 ft bed being a little more practical for building materials and other stuff but, still need to tie stuff down dependent on weather etc since you gotta leave the tailgate down. IF I had a bigger garage, I would have got a crew cab with a 6' bed but, I hate parking my rig outside!

 

Edited by Imcrazy
Posted
2 hours ago, James Euler said:

Those baby seats are a whole 'nother thing, for sure. That's when I gave up my beloved Silverado DC, some twenty years ago. But I'm soon to cure that loss.

 

Two important things that fit nicely in a 6 (and a half!) foot bed, but not in a 5 foot bed: me, lying down, and any of my bicycles, standing up. And there's scads of stuff that fits much better: stack of 8' studs, sheet goods (you've got a solid 8 feet with the tailgate down), more boxes of anything (tile, flooring, etc).

 

But that's my world. I'm sure you're digging your Z71 CC.


You can always get a CC with the standard bed. Best of both worlds. ??‍♂️

Posted
7 hours ago, spizike9 said:


You can always get a CC with the standard bed. Best of both worlds. ??‍♂️

Agree! I’d get a crew cab with an 8ft bed if possible. I use every bit of room in my truck. My back seats are folded up holding misc small gear in the wedge, the floor in the rear seat area is stacked with tools. And almost every bit of my 6.5ft bed is full of tools. 
The longer wheelbase also quite noticeably helps with stability on the highway. 
Shorter trucks definitely help with maneuverability, especially with a trailer. A long truck like mine needs plenty of room to turn a trailer around. I’ve seen a lot of guys who do service or sales of RVs or commercial trailers use regular cab short bed trucks or no bed, just hitch plate over the shortest wheelbase possible in order to help maneuver trailers.

Looking at dealer lots, it does seem like GM and other manufacturers are trying to push consumers into either Double Cab/STD bed or Crew Cab/short bed.

 

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Imcrazy said:

 


I used to agree with you but, then I had a baby and those rear facing car seats don’t fit in a double cab unless your passenger wants to ride with their knees on the dash! To me 6 ft beds are almost as useless as 5 ft beds.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Had a car seat in mine plenty of times. Seems pretty easy to buy a different type of seat. 

 

And the difference between a standard/regular box and a short box is the difference in fitting surfboards, fishing poles, dirt bikes, motorcycles, and most importantly yourself, in the back of your truck. Now if you simply use your truck as a mall crawler and grocery getter no doubt, the extra space in the cab is going to be more beneficial, but for everyone else, that 16" of space is the difference between having too short a bed and something that is basically a custom fit. 

 

And that is not even touching on the proportions of the truck and how a short box looks goofy AF and how a standard/regular box was the reason that trucks became so popular in the first place. But ill leave that one alone as the natives on here get a little butthurt when you go down that road. 

 

The simple truth is, if you are driving a CCSB you would be infinitely better off with a full size SUV and you are a poser only driving a truck for the "status." But again, I digress. 

Edited by superhighsierra
Posted
4 hours ago, Sqrls said:

Agree! I’d get a crew cab with an 8ft bed if possible. I use every bit of room in my truck. My back seats are folded up holding misc small gear in the wedge, the floor in the rear seat area is stacked with tools. And almost every bit of my 6.5ft bed is full of tools. 
The longer wheelbase also quite noticeably helps with stability on the highway. 
Shorter trucks definitely help with maneuverability, especially with a trailer. A long truck like mine needs plenty of room to turn a trailer around. I’ve seen a lot of guys who do service or sales of RVs or commercial trailers use regular cab short bed trucks or no bed, just hitch plate over the shortest wheelbase possible in order to help maneuver trailers.

Looking at dealer lots, it does seem like GM and other manufacturers are trying to push consumers into either Double Cab/STD bed or Crew Cab/short bed.

 

It's possible, but you'll need to get a 25/3500 you can get a crew with an 8' bed. 

 

GM currently does not build a reg cab with a 6.5ft box (at least not for US/Can)

 

Crew-short was designed to fit in the same space as the ext cab 6.5ft box. 

When the crew-short was introduced, it was exactly the same wheelbase as the ext-cab std bed.

Many garages can fit a crew-short, but not a crew-std.  

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, lt1z said:

I love my DC AT4. Prob wouldn’t have found one on a lot though. I ordered it optioned with what I wanted.

I was really wanting that setup, but was too slow off the mark. Now (2021), they don’t even offer DC AT4. I’m kinda jealous.

Posted
5 hours ago, superhighsierra said:

The simple truth is, if you are driving a CCSB you would be infinitely better off with a full size SUV and you are a poser only driving a truck for the "status." But again, I digress. 

If that full size SUV could do what I need it to for farm work I would probably have one.  Until that happens, I along with the other farmers around here will take our “poser” trucks and go haul a ton of feed in our useless 5’8” box with the tailgate closed and room to spare for all of the other junk that has already been thrown in.

226C2400-4811-4918-9620-E16E9668BFBF.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, JReiser said:

If that full size SUV could do what I need it to for farm work I would probably have one.  Until that happens, I along with the other farmers around here will take our “poser” trucks and go haul a ton of feed in our useless 5’8” box with the tailgate closed and room to spare for all of the other junk that has already been thrown in.

226C2400-4811-4918-9620-E16E9668BFBF.jpeg

 

Congrats on being the one guy who actually uses his CCSB as a truck on here.  

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...