Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are the Denali's super adjusting 1,000 times a second shocks quelling any of the vibration issues or are the Denali trucks experiencing the vibrations as well?

Posted

There's not a single automaker out there that doesn't look at it this very same way.

GM looked the same way at the ignition switches and over twenty people died as a result. Does that make it acceptable?

Posted (edited)

Are the Denali's super adjusting 1,000 times a second shocks quelling any of the vibration issues or are the Denali trucks experiencing the vibrations as well?

No. If anything the Denali magneride is worse.

 

Every vibration has and equal and opposite vibration?

Edited by jblanks
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Quick update. Truck number 2 (my 2014 was BBB'd and MSRP traded for 2015).

 

After final repair and no fix, my GM business resource contact called within a week offering me basically anything I asked for. I could pick between full MSRP trade or repurchase. I chose repurchase...done with this mess. I'm not saying other trucks are perfect...but I cannot continue this cycle of dealing with trucks that are proven to be built with faulty parts, vibrate on the highway, etc...I have to move on and give another OEM a shot.

 

All in all I drove 2 new trucks for a total of 25,000 miles, and will be losing around $2k total after lemon law usage fees, for mileage before first service visit on the 2015. That's about $80 a month on a 2 year lease, pretty sweet. Mix in the frustration, and we can call it even.

 

This may be my last post here, so I would just like to say...for those still dealing with this issue, and want out, the BBB works. It has worked twice now for me. Keep all service records, be calm and cool with your dealership, as well as with any GM reps you have to speak with. The squeaky wheel gets the grease...post YouTube videos under an account with your real name...GM monitors these things and will make note of who is keeping quiet, and who is driving business away from them via social media. The more noise you make, the easier it will be for GM to give you what you want, especially if you want your money back (my theory).

 

GM was very difficult the first time around. They made multiple terrible offers before finally (the day before our arbitration date) giving in and offering full MSRP replacement. The second time around, I made as much noise as possible on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc...and within a few days of my final repair they were already offering me full MSRP or a repurchase.

luck to all, I am moving on.

Well come back and post up what you purchased as replacement.

Glad it's settled for you.

Edited by Gofas
  • Like 1
Posted

"Boy the Ford site sounds familiar!"

 

Sure does. I'm wondering, all the truck manufacturers are in competition to try to build ever more rigid, rattle free frames and bodies. Because these bodies are now so tight, wonder if that may be the cause of this new vibration phenomenon? I haven't researched Ram but Ford and GM both appear to have similar problems.

Posted

Boy the Ford site sounds familiar!

I was talking to a buddy who own a body shop, he ran on for a ford dealer for 14 years... he says don't buy a ford, they dont stand behind their work.... sounds familiar huh? he says get a Toyota if we want something that wont have any problems.... or get a Ram

Posted

It's when the motor switches to v4 mode. Watch the display on the dash. Mine has the slightest shudder or vibration when cruising, low rpm. I manually lock the Trans in 5th gear around town, which keeps engine in v8 mode and problem is solved. Still does it in 6th gear around 50 or 60 mph

Posted

Just out of curiosity I did a little Googling to see if the new F-150 might be having similar problems. And, it appears that indeed it does. (Open below url) So, do your homework before you trade for another brand. Just saying.....

 

http://www.f150forum.com/f118/2015-f150-fx4-vibration-help-297498/

It appears not as bad as GM. Only 119 replies and 17544 views.

Posted

"It appears not as bad as GM. Only 119 replies and 17544 views."

 

Umm, appears that the GM replies are about the same ole 100 people who've posted about 175 times :) On a serious note though, it's obvious that there's a very vocal small minority that's trying very hard to elevate this issue. I'm not convinced their motives are pure. Just saying....

Posted

Well I've now had 2 vibrators, and others have also had more than one. Vocal, yes, $50K+ trucks you can't drive would make you vocal also. It's also now been 3 YEARS and no fix on the horizon.

  • Like 2
Posted

Well I've now had 2 vibrators, and others have also had more than one. Vocal, yes, $50K+ trucks you can't drive would make you vocal also. It's also now been 3 YEARS and no fix on the horizon.

There will be a quick fix on the horizon if you quit buying these vehicles.

Posted (edited)

A few days (weeks?) back I tried some rear spring clamps to help alleviate the issue. It helped, but only temporarily. The shake came back once the springs settled (30 miles?)

 

Today I tried a large clamp (Autozone - 6 inch? $3) about 5 inches from the front of the driveshaft. I put the screw clamp opposite the large counterweight on drive shaft.

 

Could be in my head but seems to have helped significantly.

 

Going to continue down this path to see where it leads.

http://www.demandaam.com/technical-support/aam-technical-tips/driveshaft-balancing

Edited by jblanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...