Jump to content

Driving the 2016 GMC Sierra and 2.8L Duramax Canyon

Zane

By Zane
in Article & Review Archive (Pre-2019)

Recommended Posts

Zane Senior Enthusiast

Zane

Posted
Posted

2016_sierra.jpeg2016_canyon.jpeg

Zane Merva
Executive Editor, GM-Trucks.com
9/9/2015

Update 10/5: See below post. TDLR- I'm sick and won't be able to attend this drive.


We are excited to announce our next Live Post First Drive. On October 6th we will step behind the wheel of the refreshed 2016 GMC Sierra and all new 2016 2.8L Duramax Canyon.

We can't wait to share our experience driving of these exciting new GMC models as it happens. If you've never seen one of our Live Posts, check out what we've done in the past.

In the meantime, we're looking for your suggestions and comments. What do you want to know? What do you want us to check out? Even highly technical questions are welcome as we will have an opportunity to chat with engineers and product managers.

See you all LIVE on October 6th!

2016_sierra.jpeg

2016_canyon.jpeg

2016_sierra.jpeg

2016_canyon.jpeg

2016_sierra.jpeg

2016_canyon.jpeg

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

MPG loop on the Dmax. I have yet to see any official EPA ratings but I may not have tried looking to hard yet. Oh and how it tows as well. The exhaust brake on the big brother HD was/is the best one on the market so hopefully some HD tech was applied to the twins.

 

Oh and interior noise level. Cruze diesel is great but was a bit noisy when pushed in the higher revs inside.

steveR Enthusiast

steveR

Posted
Posted

Side by side drag race with the equivalent gas truck.

My Suburban is getting little old. I would slide into an oil burner if offered?

Fingers crossed.

SilverSierra New Member

SilverSierra

Posted
Posted

I'd like to see a comparison between the 2.8 L and the 3.6 L in the Canyon regarding: emissions; handling; cold weather performance, issues and concerns; anticipated annual cost of ownership over 5 and 8 years; and anything else that you can think of that isn't normally covered in the typical test or review.

I live in northern Alberta, Canada and see the Canyon as my next truck once I mile out my 2010 Sierra. Initially, I was planning on buying the 3.6 L but I am being open minded and want to consider the 2.8 as well. But, I want my decision based on sound knowledge and not live to regret deciding on one over the other.

Thanks in advance for for any and all info.

Cheers!

soleful2001 New Member

soleful2001

Posted
Posted

I saw the specs some where. It said it would tow 7500 lbs properly equipped. so what is "properly equipped" and will that be factory available?

Also, would it be safe for a truck this size to be towing this much weight?

if I were to tow a travel trailer with a high profile, how would it perform?

 

I currently own a 2008 silverado LT with a 5.3L engine and a standard bed. I tow a 5200 lb 24 foot travel trailer with tandem axles. Personally I would not want to tow a bigger trailer with my current set up and the panel on the truck rates it at 7700lbs. I am set up with all the proper gear, sway control bar, heavy duty Reese platform, load levelers.

daloudin New Member

daloudin

Posted
Posted

Mountain towing. Can it maintain 70mph while towing the mfr maximum towing weight up a 12% incline for 7 miles (I77 going North in to Virginia)? How's it handle coming back down the same? Heat build up while doing so? How does the A/C handle 99 degrees with 95% humidity at the same time? Noise levels per the Cruze comment earlier? 4x4 Low range throttle response off idle, will there be an alternate throttle curve for low speed off road driving?

barry G Senior Enthusiast

barry G

Posted
Posted

rpm at 75, and some rural road driving, leans and dips and bumps and curves and sudden 12% grade hills and drop offs.

 

I interested mostly just the rpm at maine highway speed.

j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted

Clunky drive train?

Slippy gears/converter clutch?

 

Accelerate up to 30km/h and slow down rapidly. Repeat 3 times. Like in stop and go traffic. How is the trans shifting?

 

Hover with the gas pedal at a shifting point of the transmission. Is it shifting up or down nicely?

(What I mean is my truck shifts at 35km/h from 3rd to 4th under slow acceleration. When I just barely accelerate the shift is clunky and rocky).

 

Down shift on an incline. Does the engine rev up and is the converter clutch slipping like you're riding a clutch?

 

I hope you understand my questions. Sometimes it's hard to explain.

 

:)

so long

j-ten-ner

mike49024 Enthusiast

mike49024

Posted
Posted

Very curious about throttle response. Does it respond well to rolling into the throttle? Shift quality is also important.

 

My 2012 5.3 Sierra makes decent power if WOT but has lethargic throttle response and shifts are all over the place. Some are smooth, some are firm but other times I get slow shifts with flare.

 

Hoping they improved this on the new trucks.

 

And obviously fuel economy numbers.

Nargg Enthusiast

Nargg

Posted
Posted

Towing is definately a big plus, but heck, I like that you don't get any lag at anytime for any reason, period. The power on demand is just mezmerizing. You know what I mean after you've driven one daily of any size any setup.

Jsdirt Senior Enthusiast

Jsdirt

Posted
Posted

How about GM publish a salt-spray test, so that we can gauge whether or not the thing is going to become a rusted out, useless, $40k paperweight in 8 years like their full sized models? I won't be holding my breath on that one ...

 

A lot of good a diesel is when the body can barely make it past 200k ....

Omar1 Enthusiast

Omar1

Posted
Posted

Is the new 5.3 getting the 8 speed?

 

Yes and no!

 

Yes the new 2016 trucks with 5.3 are getting the 8 speed

No, it's not a new 5.3 engine (the same engine as on 2014 and 2015)

  • 2 weeks later...
Ron.s Enthusiast

Ron.s

Posted
Posted

Some 5.3 will get the 8 speed....only upper trim levels,

Zane Senior Enthusiast

Zane

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi everyone. I'm pretty sick today and won't be making this drive. Thankfully I have a chance to drive these trucks next week. I will update you all on the new schedule.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...