Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

** Read Before You Buy a 2014/2015 GM Truck**

My truck is awesome, make sure you buy one, you will love it.

 

Now since I cancelled out your opinion, can we delete this thread??? Lmao!

My truck is a "B-" if you buy one look for these issues, you will not love having these problems.

 

Uncanceled, no deleteing necessary...and we're back on track. Keep the bumps^^ coming.

Posted

 

No your suggestion is a pretty extreme solution to a simple problem and not in line with my thinking at all. Instead of running every single wiper motor for 24 hrs they should develope a more extensive R&D department that work in conjunction with the parts supplier to make sure that each batch of parts for a particular segement of vehicles are up to par. Many companies do this but it cost money obviously.

....the same part has been in use since at least 2009... R&D isn't the issue. Crap happens, the good manufactures make things right.

Posted

....the same part has been in use since at least 2009... R&D isn't the issue. Crap happens, the good manufactures make things right.

 

No your wrong

 

2009-2012 Acadia, Enclave, Traverse windshield wiper motor part# 20785187

 

2013-2015 Acadia, Enclave, Traverse windshield wiper motor part# 22820106

Posted

 

No I would rather buy it for a premium price and have no problems and recalls for 100k miles as long as I keep up with the regular maintainence. This is the problem with modern day production and modern day consumers. We have been trained to accept a lower standard of quality over time in exchange for warranties and recalls that hardly ever fix the root cause of the issue which poor overall quality and the idea that no company wants to produce a great product they are only in it for profit. I had a 2012 GMC sierra that was perfect no recalls and no issues the paint was perfect and the ride was 100% smooth. Only issue I had was it was not 4x4. If it was I would not even have this 2014 "B-" rated truck.

The 2012 you had was 5 years into the production. They had time to find and correct issues in the 5 previous years models. Since you and I (mine is a Aug 13 build) have the newest model truck out there has not been time to find all of the issues that spring up. No matter how long or how many miles they tested these trucks. They are not going to test a truck for 5 years before they release it by then the other manufacturers have passed them by.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

..if only you had posted before I bought my 2014 All Star.

 

1. Paint- Great shine and almost perfect. A beautiful deep red color that really catches your eye.

2. Recalls- One minor recall...a programming issue. I never noticed it. The dealer told me about the recall and did the update for me.

3. Vibrations- So far the only vibrations I've noticed have been road related, or the bass is up to high on my stereo, causing the rear view mirror to shake with every THUMP! of the excellent entertainment system.

4. Interior- nice to look at and touch, quality is a solid AAA. Quiet, classy, and comfortable.

5. Electrical- Nothing at all.

6. Powertrain- I USE my truck. I've pulled out bushes with it, loaded it to the top, ran it like I stole it, even laid long patches of rubber with traction control off just to see if I could do it. I'd say it's pretty damned solid.

Yeah, I'm real sorry I wasted my hard-earned money (even with a $10K discount from MSRP) on an absolutely STUNNING truck.

In fact, I dislike my truck so much that when it's finally time to get rid of it, in say ten or twenty years, I'll probably make the same mistake again and buy a GM truck.

Edited by patriot
  • Like 4
Posted

The vibration problem is more prevalent than people think. I have it in my truck like many others, it's obviously enough of an issue that there is an extensive TSB out to address the problem that works for some but not all. I filled out my GMC customer survey and informed them of my displeasure with the vehicle and got a phone call from GM over my vibration problems in which I was told by the rep that GM is aware of the issue and they are currently working on a fix that they think will be ready and released soon. Either she was giving me a load of crap and they are doing nothing about it or they really are working on a fix that goes beyond the TSB. If they are working on a fix then the problem must be more widespread to constitute engineering time to develop a fix, they wouldn't make the investment for a few trucks having issues. My point is there is more substance to fireaxxe's post, I'm glad other people posting on here haven't had any issues and love their truck but that's not the case for everyone that's bought one and more than a few are dealing with the highway vibration issues.

Posted (edited)

 

No your wrong

 

2009-2012 Acadia, Enclave, Traverse windshield wiper motor part# 20785187

 

2013-2015 Acadia, Enclave, Traverse windshield wiper motor part# 22820106

Oops, forgot about the year change but still, it's been the same since 13, these are 16's that are having issues, again, R&D wont do a thing once the part has spent 3 years in production.

 

Recalls aren't a bad thing. So many people have it stuck in their head that a recall is a horrible thing. Again, a problem fixed with no money out of my pocket? I'm happy... So far no recalls on my 15 either... Though, I did just receive a recall for my 09 GSX-R's master cylinder, again, happy they're fixing it without it becoming an issue or costing me money.

Edited by El_Diablo_John
Posted

I'd love to get a recall letter for them to make some changes on my truck to eliminate the vibration. It would be nice if GM was more forthcoming like Honda has been with the CRV vibration issues.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well..I love my reg.cab 4.3L WT2 truck. It's my primary vehicle, hauls various loads, and pulls a double axle horse trailer. I will admit I was a tech at a dealership for 26 years, and know my way around my truck if any problems occur. A Chevy pickup was my choice after considering all makes and models, and have not regretted it. As others have stated, it is a "truck" not a Cadillac, and that's all I ask from it. Good fuel mileage also.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Well I guess its my turn to post about all of the issues in my truck.

 

I have a 2015 Shakerado LT CC 4x4 loaded up with accessories inc. 22" rims with Dueller A/T RH-S tires

 

---I have vibration very visible at higher speeds, but always felt.

---I had the rough idle, appears to have been fixed, but I feel as though it made the regular vibration worse, possibly because the frequency from the rough idle isn't canceling out the frequency from the regular vibe anymore? The weirdest one is when the truck shakes from left to right, only happens once every couple weeks, but its very weird.

---I have the radio reception issue, the audio fades out, you lose all of the highs. If the truck is not moving, it's sometimes ok, but once the truck is moving, don't expect audio from the radio. The XM works fine though.... but you have to pay for that

---Every once in a while I get the "clunk" in the transmission and late throttle response.

 

I love the look of this truck, but thats it, I hate EVERYTHING ELSE about it. there is nothing good with it. I am beyond done dealing with this POS

 

1stepcloser's post below reminded me of a few things I forgot to mention:

 

---The AFM vibe in the 4.3 is TERRIBLE and felt constantly

---The Truck is a rattle box, if you put the rear seats in the upright position, they rattle over even the slightest road imperfection, and the truck as a whole just rattles like crazy

Edited by Jesse D
Posted (edited)

What the heck, I’m gonna chime in here also. I bought my truck new, in May 2015. It’s a Silverado CC standard bed 5.3 LTZ. This is my third new truck from GM.

My first truck, 1990 7.4L powered CC long bed dually was a durable vehicle. That’s about all I can say about it. It was severely underpowered, lacked any kind of creature comfort, and the paint peeled off of it in sheets. It could barely move out of its own way much less tow anything and if you presented it a hill, well, turn off all the accessories and roll down the windows to try and slow the inevitable overheating. All this while maintaining a marvelous 6 mpg average. I drove that truck for 15 years and 175,000 miles without ever opening the drivetrain. I loved it.

 

Second truck was 2005 CC LB Duramax. Great powertrain. Much better creature comfort. Awesome fuel mileage. Two recalls, a master cylinder accumulator that was replaced and a rear center seatbelt loop they simply cut off. It had its quirks though. Just like the first one, it would overheat if asked to tow a grade in the heat. Nothing in the way of current electronics was onboard. Simple radio and CD player, automatic dual climate control. That was about it. Paint was durable, boring, but durable. I drove that truck for eight years and 110,000 miles without ever opening the drivetrain. I loved it.

 

My current truck is light years ahead of those two. I have always accepted that what I buy are trucks first and that’s why I buy them. I use my them as trucks. Although I only have 4500 miles, here is a quick assessment:

  • It is the smoothest and quietest truck I have owned. Better than most of my cars too. I guess I’m lucky mine doesn’t vibrate. It also doesn’t clunk, squeak, rattle or have undue wind noise.
  • The drivetrain is very good. The little 5.3 makes as much power as my 6.6 Duramax, with the exception of a little torque but it's whole lot quieter. I don’t notice the AFM, I just put it in drive and well, drive. It does what it does when it needs to. My best 50 mile mpg is 29.5. Incredible.
  • Throttle response is fine. I step on the gas pedal and the engine responds. The more I depress the pedal, the faster it responds. I have noticed that under WOT condition the transmission shifts super quickly. Definitely a programming feature from the normal drive mode. Nice touch.
  • The entertainment system works to my satisfaction whenever I use it. Sure, my iPod trips out sometimes, but it ain’t the end of the world, I just unplug it, plug it in and go on with my day.
  • Bose is the best audio system upgrade for the price. (It came included in the LTZ plus package)
  • The navigation is intuitive, very easy to use and has not failed to get me to my destination. I admit though, I don't used it if I already know where I’m going.
  • The paint is good quality, free of blemishes and has a nice depth to it. I chose Tungsten Metallic on this truck, it’s awesome.
  • The interior is flat out amazing. No metal surfaces! Nice leather, cooled seats, sunroof, heated steering wheel(!) cool instrument layout, dashboard stitching, I love the appearance and particularly the current and modern electronics. I have the collision avoidance system and it is actually a really nice feature. It does a fine job of alerting me when necessary.

Personally, I’m glad GM continues to bring more luxury and modern electronics to the truck line. If I wanted a basic, plain truck, I would have kept my 1990 CC.

 

If my 15 has a problem, I’ll take it in and have it addressed. Not a big deal. It seems some folks get awful worked up over a truck. To those I say, Relax, it’s a truck, It’s just a truck. Save your drama for something important.

Edited by 1stepcloser
  • Like 2
Posted

Agree with all you posted 1stepcloser except maybe the 5.3L having the power of a Duramax...or maybe my memory of our 2005 Duramax is a little off :)

  • Like 1
Posted

Agree with all you posted 1stepcloser except maybe the 5.3L having the power of a Duramax...or maybe my memory of our 2005 Duramax is a little off :)

Well, I'm just quoting numbers... 355 horsepower versus the Duramax's 310. The DMax did make more torque, If memory serves me, the DMax made 520 lbs/ft? to the 5.3's 385lbs/ft. I haven't towed anything of substance with my 15 yet, So perhaps I should withhold my judgment. But... this little 5.3 is a real powerhouse relative to its size. and it's quiet!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...