Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/27/2019 at 6:57 PM, Irwinazo said:

Not the greatest pictures but I went ahead and did it...pewterliftedz is right tho, it will start chipping off soon lol...

9DC5BE07-52BA-49DD-9318-0FB7BC1974CB.jpeg

84E17FE2-DBB9-4F6A-83F7-C6F9D3761AFF.jpeg

I believe these are installed / clocked incorrectly.  On the top you should see the step of the mount / end of the spring.  

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Has anyone put these on the second setting yet? I’m curious to see how much of a squat you would get. I’d like to run 33x12.50 tires but don’t want them to look stuffed in to the wheel wells. Also don’t want the squatted look. Maybe I’d need a larger rear block?Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted
20 hours ago, signaltwenty said:

Has anyone put these on the second setting yet? I’m curious to see how much of a squat you would get. I’d like to run 33x12.50 tires but don’t want them to look stuffed in to the wheel wells. Also don’t want the squatted look. Maybe I’d need a larger rear block?Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

From what I’ve read unless you’re running a heavy winch or some crazy brush guard they do NOT advise running these on the the higher levels. If you’re looking for more lift I’d say get an actual “lift kit”. These pictures are with 33x12.50 tires they deff don’t look stuffed to me !? A1014B58-F3A3-469E-B61D-D52A55EF225C.thumb.jpeg.37ef90c48424c2736ce4f60ca76847d8.jpeg

37D9564B-BA3E-47C2-B23B-B566C64636F5.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks nice man! I was looking in to putting aftermarket wheels on with a -12 offset which typically needs more wheel well to make turns. Just want to make sure the outcome will look right before I go forward. My other option was the Motofab 3/2 kit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
From what I’ve read unless you’re running a heavy winch or some crazy brush guard they do NOT advise running these on the the higher levels. If you’re looking for more lift I’d say get an actual “lift kit”. These pictures are with 33x12.50 tires they deff don’t look stuffed to me !? A1014B58-F3A3-469E-B61D-D52A55EF225C.thumb.jpeg.37ef90c48424c2736ce4f60ca76847d8.jpeg
37D9564B-BA3E-47C2-B23B-B566C64636F5.thumb.jpeg.d9a1e1615b3e063a94e67332078c936f.jpeg

Any rubbing with the 12.50s or are you running spacers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
20 hours ago, GMC Sierra 34 said:


Any rubbing with the 12.50s or are you running spacers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No rubbing at all & no spacers 

Posted
23 hours ago, signaltwenty said:

Looks nice man! I was looking in to putting aftermarket wheels on with a -12 offset which typically needs more wheel well to make turns. Just want to make sure the outcome will look right before I go forward. My other option was the Motofab 3/2 kit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Go for the eibach kit ! Night and day difference comparing it to a spacer kit. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Hi guys

 

I bought my first GM Sierra a fews week ago. 2016 All-terrain and look to buy this kit. I almost read all the tread...but i'm french...so i think i probably miss somes infos... do i need to change my UCA if i set the shocks at the lower setting? I plan to fun 33" tires on my stock 20" wheel. Truck have the stamped UCA. I don't want to blow my ball joints.

 

Thanks!

20191012_143428.jpg

Edited by getpsycho
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I think it would be wise to go ahead and get new UCAs.  The kit will give you 2.5” on the lowest setting, and that’s right at the maximum recommended limit before they say you have to.  Might as well do it while you’re in there.  Just my feeling on it.  I’m sure you could get away with not replacing them, but I’d be willing to bet you’ll severely limit the life of your joints if you don’t.  I’m planning on this kit myself and new arms, too.  Love to hear any and all feedback from those who’ve run this kit for a while.  So far seems like most are very pleased.  

  • 2 months later...
Posted

finally getting my springs and struts installed tomorrow. Wanted to clear some things up in case it wasn't clear after talking with Eibach. I had a bit of a hard time understanding the grooves and what lift they provided.

 

If you have the Eibach springs with the lift shocks the lowest setting is 2.5" with the next setting being 3.2" and the next 2 way to much for this application.

 

If you have just the shocks then those grooves and increments change. If you are confused I highly recommend calling Eibach. They were very helpful as was @Waterfowler41 install video. Just needed some clarity on the grooves.

 

I've had RC spacers on the truck since I got it new so the Ranchos are shot at 60k miles and am looking forward to a ride quality increase. Will report back with pictures and a review.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Have had the kit on (springs and shocks set at 2.5") for about a week and the I give this kit an A+. It could be because my Ranchos were shot, but the truck is night and day and I couldn't be happier. 

 

Only negative to the kit is the truck doesn't sit quite as high set at the 2.5" as the RC 2.5" spacer kit did. I am not too bummed though because the ride quality has improved sooo much. I forgot to take measurements before to see how much it dropped it but it is only a tad. 

 

c1037ad45573afe9d952423639c1c534.jpg

9c239cfaaaeb81858d37930320ae0ed5.jpg

Edited by techsan15
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Waterfowler41 said:

Looks great@techsan15 !

Thanks man! Appreciate you posting all the info. This kit isn't widely used and needs to be. Great price and much higher quality than a spacer level.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just out of curiosity with the stock HIDs I get flashed for having my brights on ALOT. I am guessing its due to the lift/tires. Has anyone adjusted their headlights down after their kit was installed? I am not sure if this would help or make it worse? Thoughts?

Posted

Anyone running it at the 3 inch level(2nd notch with eibach springs)  with new UCAs? Curious how they ride when jacked up. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...