Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Similar to the 18" post, I want to see a thread with a 100% stock setup and what size tires you put on for 20" stock wheels only.  This thread is not for leveling kits or aftermarket wheels.

 

Post up some pictures!  Let us know what size your tires are and what kind.  I'm really only interested in doing very minor trimming if needed.  My last truck I just had to zip tie the liner a little further back.

 

Thanks!

 

My current stock AT4

 

Sierra AT4.jpeg

Edited by Scooter Scott
Posted

I had accelera m/t 01 35/12.50 on stock 20s and just mounted 37s today so if you're interested in them I'll sell them to you. And you can see that I fit them with no problem. I did do a 1.5" motofab leveling kit to fix the rake (which is also for sale) but it was not added until a month laterd1337df7220039585d85cfda660d0d9d.jpg36b0a1541b82caf5717b16f47d010144.jpg0c4c3a2e222a355fb608af3e938d2c01.jpg30f3a64dcb531064d20dd15767c693a7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
14 minutes ago, destrada127 said:

I had accelera m/t 01 35/12.50 on stock 20s and just mounted 37s today so if you're interested in them I'll sell them to you. And you can see that I fit them with no problem. I did do a 1.5" motofab leveling kit to fix the rake (which is also for sale) but it was not added until a month laterd1337df7220039585d85cfda660d0d9d.jpg36b0a1541b82caf5717b16f47d010144.jpg0c4c3a2e222a355fb608af3e938d2c01.jpg30f3a64dcb531064d20dd15767c693a7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

How big did you go on lift to get those 37s on it?

  • Like 1
Posted
How big did you go on lift to get those 37s on it?

4" rough country lift

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

0554b7e8c64be22dc41fbb7081e80bdd.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, destrada127 said:

4" rough country lift

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

0554b7e8c64be22dc41fbb7081e80bdd.jpg

Looks sinister and awesome at the same time, nice rig !

  • Like 2
Posted
Looks sinister and awesome at the same time, nice rig !
Thanks. I ditched the handicap bars but it's really dark in the pic. I'll have more tomof19e5048cfc51d8f9b01a7b6252d035f.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
285/60/20 anyone?

ba30d7698d88ab72aa31b98186a3748e.jpgJust for reference those are the specs of a Toyo Open country RT in the 285/60r20....destrada managed to run 35x12.50r20 accelera MT without a level and if I remember correctly on their site it stated 34.5” and on another site i found they had them at 12” wide. So your desired size is very doable.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
When going up to 37" from stock do you need to calibrate speedo?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk


Yes. I'm on 37s and when indicating 40mph I'm actually doing 45. At 60 it's closer to 67-68 so be careful or recalibrate4877769706aba2abddc2ce9b6038df2a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...