Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, elcamino said:

It takes 6 qts, you put in 6 qts.  Why do you want to add more?  That's nuts.   Reminds me of someone I know that claimed the same problem, it showed a 1/2 qt low (he said) after he did the oil change so he topped it off. Next day he checks the oil and its showing overfull by a small amount.  I know this because he kept bugging me about it because I more or less convinced him to buy the vehicle after he asked my opinion.  Since then he is nit-picking finding faults with the vehicle that are not really faults, he is just compulsive and is checking the oil more times in a week than I do in 5 yrs.   Some oil is always going to cling to interior engine parts (ever more so with synthetics) so of the 6 qts some its not all draining back and you are over thinking it.  Sorry if that offends buy but it had to said.  Put in 6 qts and drive it. 

 

 

 

He's a perfectionist. It'll drive him nuts knowing that something isn't exactly the way it's supposed to be. More so if he has the power change it. 

Posted (edited)

I got on that merry go round on the last trip with the CRV. I check the oil before I left. I should have just left it alone. But noooo, I checked every day. Even turned it around at the father in law’s driveway. Guess what? It read different every time. Even showed down a qt once. If I had a qt I’d would have put it in. I get home the next day check it. Exactly the same as before I left 3K miles later. Funny thing I know if it’s going to burn oil I’d smell it, leak I’ll see it. 

Edited by KARNUT
Posted

I use to take mine to the shop and let them do the change and once in awhile next day I'd get a reading like that, or worse.

 

So... I started asking for my bottles back and guess what? Taking my time on the bench I'd get 1-1/2 to 2 ounces per bottle in a Mason jar. 10 to 12 ounces total. Happens when one gets in a hurry, the oil is cool and you have money to make. DYI guys do this too. Just a thought. Patients..... 

 

Different brands of filter can vary 3 or 4 ounces. 

 

The oil above the full line happens when you repeatedly check dragging oil up the tube. That bullet they use now is almost the size of the tube. Give it more time between checks. Patients....

 

Some books show as much as 20 minutes for drain down. Patients....

 

My stick never showed full on the level until I leveled the truck.... Everything about these trucks is set up for fully loaded. That will make about a 3* difference and that will make about a 4 ounce difference. About what your stick shows. 

 

Did you know that running them overfull will force them to use oil?  😉 

 

I just noticed that the stick in my 2015 is different in shape than the one in yours. 🤔 Yep...full....

 

IMG_0225.thumb.JPG.a06436e19a42b17758f70a3fc6ae674f.JPG

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

I pre-fill my oil filter. Then, when I add oil to my 5.3, I drop in 4 quarts, and then I start checking the dipstick for every 1/2 quart after that. I honestly could not tell you exactly how much oil it takes to fill the motor to the proper level. somewhere around.... 6 quarts I assume? Once it gets up to the 1/4 quart below the full mark, I start the engine for 5 seconds, and then let it sit for 5 minutes. Then I check the oil level, and add enough to get it back up to the 1/4 below the full mark. Then I run it for a few minutes and shut it down and let it sit for and hour. Then I top it off to the "full" mark. Then after driving it for a day, I check the oil level again (just in case there were leaks on the oil filter gasket or something). Then I check the oil level at every fuel fill. I also check the oil any time I'm doing other stuff, such as topping off the windshield washer fluid. I keep a rag, a funnel and 3 quarts of spare oil under the hood (along with a gallon of wash fluid, and a gallon of 50/50 coolant). I use the rag a lot, but not the oil , coolant or funnel. I also keep two tool boxes, jumper cables, engine scanners, brake fluid, a repair manual, tire chains, tire plug kit, tire pump, ratchet straps, gasket sealer, a torque wrench, spare hoses and belts, and a full on wilderness survival backpack in the rig with a GPS beacon and a set of playing cards. I am probably too attentive to my oil levels, oil change frequency, and oil pressure readings, but oh well. I enjoy it all, and it keeps connecting rods from poking holes in my engine block, so what can ya do.

I've pre-filled some filters that hang upside down in the past but have since learned that the practice is a horrible idea for potential contamination.

Posted
1 hour ago, BlaineBug said:

I've pre-filled some filters that hang upside down in the past but have since learned that the practice is a horrible idea for potential contamination.

 

Ya, I have considered that in the past. However, I use oil from a newly opened jug, and I am very careful not to let any dirt fall into the filter, which could happen with or without the pre-fill. I have been doing pre-fill on filters since the 90's, and I have not had a problem yet. I do agree that contamination is possible, any time a new filter is installed and that pre-filling theoretically adds more opportunity for contamination to happen.

Posted (edited)

I like my oil at the top of the hash marks. My 6.2 takes approximately 8.3 quarts to get there but mid hash marks is probably perfect. Measured hot with enough time for oil to settle. 

Edited by Minnvmax
Posted
6 hours ago, SilveradoRST said:

Sorry for my newbie question.  How does pre-filling the filter cause the possibility of potential contamination?   

The claim is that a particle that is introduced through the filling of the oil filter can get by and go straight to the crank bearings.  If you don't pre-fill the filter, any oil from the pan will have to first circulate through the filter which will not allow any contamination to reach the crank bearings.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

The claim is that a particle that is introduced through the filling of the oil filter can get by and go straight to the crank bearings.  If you don't pre-fill the filter, any oil from the pan will have to first circulate through the filter which will not allow any contamination to reach the crank bearings.

 

The engine will also not get oil immediately..

 

 

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, SilveradoRST said:

Sorry for my newbie question.  How does pre-filling the filter cause the possibility of potential contamination?   

 

In theory, you are adding oil to the "filtered" side of the filter material. So if a bit of foil or plastic from the oil bottle flows into the filter as your adding oil to it - then the contaminates would go "unchecked" and distributed though the engine. If you install a dry filter, then no liquid oil goes to the top end of the motor without passing through the filter material. So in theory, yes - I suppose its possible to mess your engine up by pre-filling the filter. On the other hand, many people change the oil fumbling around in the dark, drunk, in their underwear, with a cigarette dropping sparks on them as they try to spin the oil filter onto the bottom of the power steering pump - dropping dirt, crud and dust into the oil filter..... So I would not say that pre-filling the filter with oil is a bad idea - I would say that replacing the filter without knowing what your doing, is a bad idea.

Edited by Supreme Pizza
  • Like 1
Posted

My dealer charges $79 for an oil change. Seems pretty cheap to me. By the time you go to the store, crawl under the truck, dispose of the oil ,  etc. , I really question whether your saving anything.   Plus by using the dealer there is an on line record in the event of a warranty issue. Call me crazy.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Bamacommander said:

My dealer charges $79 for an oil change. Seems pretty cheap to me. By the time you go to the store, crawl under the truck, dispose of the oil ,  etc. , I really question whether your saving anything.   Plus by using the dealer there is an on line record in the event of a warranty issue. Call me crazy.

I’ve been doing it that way for about 20 years except with my classic vehicles. Longer with the wife’s cars.

Posted
21 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

I've pre-filled some filters that hang upside down in the past but have since learned that the practice is a horrible idea for potential contamination.

Amazing the stuff people can come up with. Is this possible? Sure, if you're an idiot. I have been prefilling oil filters for over 50 years. Never had an engine failure. The first start after an oil change and not prefilling an oil filter causes a short time before oil pressure comes up while it fills up the oil filter. Does this matter? To me it does. Your vehicle, your choice.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

Amazing the stuff people can come up with. Is this possible? Sure, if you're an idiot. I have been prefilling oil filters for over 50 years. Never had an engine failure. The first start after an oil change and not prefilling an oil filter causes a short time before oil pressure comes up while it fills up the oil filter. Does this matter? To me it does. Your vehicle, your choice.

It might be an a n a l  thing to worry about, sure, but here's a "Bob is the oil guy" topic dating back to 2009 about the subject.

 

https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/prefilling-oil-filters-not-good.114428/

 

Think about all of the other a n a l-esque topics that get discussed here.  If it's not necessary to pre-fill I'm no longer going to worry about it, personally.  Once again the 50,000 other users here have mileage that may vary.

Edited by BlaineBug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
    • Progress... sort of.   Intake is disassembled, spider is out, fuel lines removed. Used a torch on the stripped screw with the lower intake off, much easier when I've got the intake sitting on my workbench, I made it talk. Walked right out with a pair of vice grips once it was nice and toasty hot.   New parts are piling up on my service cart waiting to be installed. Distributor, temperature sensor, new gaskets, fuel line kit, themostat, water neck.   My new pickle is I don't want to spend $600 on a replacement spider. I'm not sure IT is bad. I'm probably splitting hairs. Or it's $300 to send mine away and another 3 weeks of the truck just sitting. I have half a mind to assemble everything with the old spider to see if I can get away with just replacing the fuel pressure regulator to be safe. The obvious issue was the gushing high pressure fuel line which will be replaced. Getting to the spider really isn't that hard, and now I know what I'm doing , swapping it would be a breeze should it absolutely need one. Stupid, or smart?   The part that gives me pause is replacing the distributor. Well, it's already out. And I didn't mark it, whoopsie! Engine was at TDC when I removed it, I know that, so upon correct reinstall the metal tip on the rotor should point to the TDC mark on the distributor because that's where it was pointing on the old distributor. Worst case I'm a tooth off and have to re-stab it.   But then, what? I assume the truck will start. It doesn't appear the timing can be set. Here's the problem: These distributors can't be rotated but a degree or two, by design. What I read is Cam ****** needs to be -2 to +2 degrees, ideally at 0 (and checked/set above 1000 rpm). There should be enough wiggle to get that properly set, but checking the reported value is another potential issue. My Actron 9185 scanner says it supports enhanced GM PIDs and Cam ****** is one of them but it's unclear that I'll be able to correctly see it over OBD 1.5. I can see why people end up junking these things with life left in them. They're an absolute nightmare with tweener-year diagnostics/electronics and unobtanium parts.   Fingers crossed it starts and idles nicely. There can be hope, right? I'ma buy a lottery ticket the same day just in case.   Next steps..DO IT. I have not installed an intake before so I've been reading and watching a lot. Some say NO RTV except on china walls, some say DO RTV on water ports but not fuel/air intake. 1/4 or 3/8 bead on China walls? I think my strategy will be, obviously, RTV china walls with overlap on the gasket corners. Chapstick-style RTV the water ports. Leave intake ports dry. The only set of intake gaskets I could find locally are Edelbrock performance gaskets (uh...for an asthmatic 190hp V6? LOL) so we'll see how they do.   #NoToolLeftBehind. It took an hour, but my recovery mission for my deep 10mm socket was successful. It had rolled down the bellhousing and wedged itself between what I think are the fuel lines? I couldn't see it at all, but with a junk antenna I had laying around, I blindly went poking/sweeping for it, heard it clink, raised the truck, and caught a sliver glimpse of chrome with a flashlight way up there in Narnia. I had pushed it farther along the lines holding it captive, but within access of severely improvised tools, poking and cursing at it to finally knock it free to where I could get a fingertip on it to bring it home.    Not much to see.      
    • Thats crazy considering im right next door (Indiana)
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...