Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm hoping someone can help me with this mystery.

 

I cannot figure out what is causing my brakes to engage or rather not "disengage" after about 10-15 minutes of driving around.  When the issue occurs, It starts off slowly with a slight sensation that the truck is suddenly pulling a heavy trailer, but then steadily becomes worse the further I go, eventually having to floor the gas to pull over safely off to the side.  In the short term, If I pull over and pump the brake pedal a few times and start driving again it seems to fix the problem but only for a short while before it happens again. I have an OBD2 reader but it doesn't grant diagnostic data for brakes.  I do have a live data read out of everything while the occurrence happens and would be glad to provide it if someone is able to use that info to narrow down a conclusion.

When the issue happens, I can just let off the gas and the truck will come to a stop without needing to apply the brake.  The feeling as if you're going through thick mud.

I changed my brake pads about 3000 miles ago, so I don't see a correlation to my DIY brake job being the cause.  The truck has 56K miles. 

 

Things that I've done so far: 

  1. Replaced the Brake sensor control switch (code was thrown that mentioned Stabilitrak (it led me down a rabbit hole) (pain in the F'ng ass) - Still have issue.
  2. Took the calipers off and greased the pins. thought they might be getting stuck.   - Issue is still present.
    Update: 01/20/2024
  3. Replaced both front wheel hub assembly 
  4. Added new brakes, Rotors, calipers

Issue is still present.

 

My next step would be to replace both the front calipers. <-- NOPE.  I feel like I'm guessing at this point and the cause could be a Master Cylinder, Brake booster, Solenoid, bad brake fluid or lines.  And to add, I have conspiracy monkeys in my head telling me it's all still related to the faulty GM vacuum pump issue.  

 


 

All this to say, if someone has dealt with a similar issue in the past and figured out the cause I would be grateful to hear from you. 

 

Past service history:

Service Performed: 28K miles:

  • Electronic Brake Control Module Reprogramming with SPS
  • AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER REPLACEMENT
  • Vacuum Pump Replacement
  • Power Steering Control Module Reprogramming with SPS

Service Performed: 11K miles:

  • SDM PROGRAM (@11,000 miles)
  • Transfer Case Shift Control Module Reprogramming with SPS
     
Edited by BrianBrianBrian
missing word, added stuff
Posted

Check pedal to booster linkage.

 

If it were me I'd look at replacing the master cylinder or booster. 

 

Maybe just bleed the brakes for the experience? 

  • Like 1
Posted

Start off with the simple thinks, in my opinion. The Stabilitrak issue may be caused by a bad ground. There are several videos on YouTube on this, since bad grounds seem to plage these trucks. I even

added (2) additional grounds per AnthonyJ350.  Good luck on the diagnostics

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Snowcamo said:

Check pedal to booster linkage.

 

If it were me I'd look at replacing the master cylinder or booster. 

 

Maybe just bleed the brakes for the experience? 

I think my next step will be to do a brake flush.  I can't for the life of me see how the calipers would go bad this early...which leads me to think its fluid related because the issue happens after the truck has warmed up.  

 

I'll add your suggestions to the list of things to try, thanks.

Posted
1 hour ago, rav3 said:

Start off with the simple thinks, in my opinion. The Stabilitrak issue may be caused by a bad ground. There are several videos on YouTube on this, since bad grounds seem to plage these trucks. I even

added (2) additional grounds per AnthonyJ350.  Good luck on the diagnostics

 

 

 

 

 

I don't think it's a grounding issue but I don't know what it is yet, so can't eliminate that.   If my issue was ground issue I'd likely be experiencing many other anomalies that are electric in nature to operation.   I've seen a lot of folks deal with the grounding issue in here and fortunately I've yet to deal with that..fingers crossed.  The braking system is engineered to be a mechanical feature of the vehicle in case the vehicle loses engine power, battery, or encounters a faulty ground so the vehicle can still come to a complete stop if one of those scenarios were to occur. 

Posted

What brake pads did you put in? I found out the hard way that the aftermarket new pads I bought from O'Reilly's caused same problem. After ditching those and installing OEM AC Delco pads, the problem went away.

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

What brake pads did you put in? I found out the hard way that the aftermarket new pads I bought from O'Reilly's caused same problem. After ditching those and installing OEM AC Delco pads, the problem went away.

Interesting.  I purchased the ac Delco ones from advanced Auto parts.

Were the old pads you originally purchased sticking to the rotor? 

Posted
9 hours ago, BrianBrianBrian said:

Interesting.  I purchased the ac Delco ones from advanced Auto parts.

Were the old pads you originally purchased sticking to the rotor? 

No, I was replacing the original OEM pads as they were worn down. I cheaper out and bought the O'Reilly's brand BrakeBest pads. No problem with brakes sticking on original pads. However, first set of BrakeBest were a problem. The ears were just slightly larger than the slots on the caliper mounts so didn't move freely and would bind to the rotor. I exchanged those almost immediately for another set. They fit slightly better but still same problem. I even installed refurbished caliper mounts thinking that might have been the problem but still wouldn't properly release from the rotors. I gave up and bought a set of AC Delco pads and they fit properly and no more binding and rubbing on rotor. They worked as they should.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, UrbanRage said:

Have you tried turning off the Emergency Automatic Braking in the infotainment system? 

This is a new one on me and I never heard of it. I can't find any kind of setting or option about this in my infotainment and even tried looking in the owners manual and nothing there either. Can you explain this further please?

Posted

I only ever had that issue with the rubber line to the caliber. And that was with older vehicles. It wouldn’t release fluid.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/2/2024 at 10:32 AM, mikeyk101 said:

This is a new one on me and I never heard of it. I can't find any kind of setting or option about this in my infotainment and even tried looking in the owners manual and nothing there either. Can you explain this further please?

 

Sure, after going into my Sierra's menu, I found it is called the Collision Detection System. On the radio display, Home->Settings->Vehicle->Collision Detection System-> Options are Off, Alert and Alert, and Brake. 

 

 

Edited by UrbanRage
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, UrbanRage said:

 

Sure, after going into my Sierra's menu, I found it is called the Collision Detection System. On the radio display, Home->Settings->Vehicle->Collision Detection System-> Options are Off, Alert and Alert, and Brake. 

I hope this helps.

 

Ok, I have a 2016 and only the rear sensors so that probably explains why I don't have it on mine.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm at the point to where I'm about to just replace the brake, calipers and rotors as a set.  If that doesn't fix the problem then I'll start diagnosing brake booster and the master solenoid ect..

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...