Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/29/2018 at 10:55 PM, Shredzy said:

On my Sierra with the Morimoto HID kit I turned off all light notifications for the door lock/unlock for unnecessary start/stop of the HID bulbs.

how did you do that? 

Posted
how did you do that? 


You can access that in your head unit. It’ll let you shut off approach lighting and stuff.
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, cire0309 said:

 


You can access that in your head unit. It’ll let you shut off approach lighting and stuff.

 

ok, what I thought, but best to ask to be sure. :thumbs:

Posted
4 hours ago, Roscopcoletrain said:

ok, what I thought, but best to ask to be sure. :thumbs:

cire0309 is correct.

  • Like 1
Posted

this is what i got from fastheadlights. How do i connect to the battery and both lights?

Im missing a wire rifht?

20180916_101646.jpg

Posted
this is what i got from fastheadlights. How do i connect to the battery and both lights?
Im missing a wire rifht?
20180916_101646.thumb.jpg.98375dae013c98d31ebea9b265c6343c.jpg
Capacitor links missing :(

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Here is a new video I put together for installing a Morimoto D2S 4.0 projector. I dont have this new kit listed on my site yet, but it is going to be the same cost as the FXR kit.

I hadn't had the time till this past week to design a bracket that kept the projector lense as far forward as it needed to be. The new brackets make for a super easy install.

I am still selling the FXR even though the D2S is a slightly easier install. Reason being is that the FXR is a completely sealed projector so no light can escape around the lenses. Lots of guys like the enclosed unit. The FXR and 4.0 perform almost identical to each other. Both can do 55 watt ballasts as well. The 4.0 is a better choice if you want to do a demon eye with an etched lense.

Here is the video:



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 9/16/2018 at 7:55 PM, FastWS6TA said:

Here is a new video I put together for installing a Morimoto D2S 4.0 projector. I dont have this new kit listed on my site yet, but it is going to be the same cost as the FXR kit.

I hadn't had the time till this past week to design a bracket that kept the projector lense as far forward as it needed to be. The new brackets make for a super easy install.

I am still selling the FXR even though the D2S is a slightly easier install. Reason being is that the FXR is a completely sealed projector so no light can escape around the lenses. Lots of guys like the enclosed unit. The FXR and 4.0 perform almost identical to each other. Both can do 55 watt ballasts as well. The 4.0 is a better choice if you want to do a demon eye with an etched lense.

Here is the video:

 


Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

What all would i need if i already have the TRS HID Kit installed in the factory projectors?

Can the XB Ballast be reused with different igniters for the D2S bulb?

Is there any problem reusing the Relay Harness that comes with the TRS HID Kit?

Posted
What all would i need if i already have the TRS HID Kit installed in the factory projectors?
Can the XB Ballast be reused with different igniters for the D2S bulb?
Is there any problem reusing the Relay Harness that comes with the TRS HID Kit?
All you need is the new projector, d2h bulbs and bracket kit. Message me if you would like help getting that.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

FastWS6TA, 

I just purchased the FX-R retro kit from your site. Do you recommend the DRL delete kit, or am I good to go with the stock DRL? Anything else you recommend for install? It's a 2015 Silverado.

Posted
FastWS6TA, 
I just purchased the FX-R retro kit from your site. Do you recommend the DRL delete kit, or am I good to go with the stock DRL? Anything else you recommend for install? It's a 2015 Silverado.
Sure you ordered it from fastheadlights.com? Lol. I dont have an order from you....

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, FastWS6TA said:

Sure you ordered it from fastheadlights.com? Lol. I dont have an order from you....

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

Yea I got them in like a week ago or so. Been holding off on the install. 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, HK_Crew said:

FastWS6TA, 

I just purchased the FX-R retro kit from your site. Do you recommend the DRL delete kit, or am I good to go with the stock DRL? Anything else you recommend for install? It's a 2015 Silverado.

What DRL delete kit are you talking about?

Posted
Yea I got them in like a week ago or so. Been holding off on the install. 
 
Ahhh. Okay. Lol. I was confused for a moment when I thought you meant you ordered yesterday. Haha.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...