Jump to content

Shake or Vibration Issues

Silver space ship
 Share

Recommended Posts

fishrman Enthusiast

fishrman

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, BigTex4x4 said:

Mine did the same thing a couple weeks ago on my 17 Sierra cc 5.3 z71 4x4. Dropped it off at the mechanic and my transmission was completely shot, not even rebuildable. The problem started at the torque converter. Did a lot of research and turns out there’s a class action lawsuit against gm on these transmissions. $4,300 out of my own pocket. I’m pissed to say the least 

Was that the 8 speed or 6?

 

  • Replies 12.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

csckickass
csckickass

Well folks, I did it. After all the failed attempts at the Chevy dealer I traded it in for a 2015 Ram 1500 Larame. I have to agree with the other folks on here that have done the same thing, it was th

mafd2
mafd2

Apparently you and the other customer reps don't care. If you or GM would care y'all would put more effort in the matter. Just coming on the forum and stating the same repetitive posts and being a 3

DALaws
DALaws

Well I have some good news and bad news about my truck vibrations. Good news is that my truck has a significantly less vibration at speed. The bad news is my truck has significantly less vibration. Fo

Posted Images

fishrman Enthusiast

fishrman

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, BigTex4x4 said:

It was the 6 speed

Interesting since that is the same as mine and they say there is no service bulletins for the 6 speed and I think the law suit is just for the 8 speed. I am still talking with GM about mine and have an open case on it. So far, I have had a hard time getting them to try to put Mobil 1 in as that seems to help those who have the 8 speed.

 

BigTex4x4 New Member

BigTex4x4

Posted
Posted

I had read the threads to flush the trans fluid and use Mobil 1 and if that didn’t work to replace the torque converter, I told my mechanic (I didn’t realize that the class action suit was for the 8 speeds) that GM had made those recommendations. He said when he took the pan off of the transmission it was completely full of metal shavings and beyond repair. Truck has 75,000 so no longer has a warranty. 

Snoringbear Enthusiast

Snoringbear

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, BigTex4x4 said:

Mine did the same thing a couple weeks ago on my 17 Sierra cc 5.3 z71 4x4. Dropped it off at the mechanic and my transmission was completely shot, not even rebuildable. The problem started at the torque converter. Did a lot of research and turns out there’s a class action lawsuit against gm on these transmissions. $4,300 out of my own pocket. I’m pissed to say the least 

Where did you get your information that there’s a class action lawsuit on the transmission?  If you could share your source it would be greatly appreciated by me and probably many others.  Thanks.

BigTex4x4 New Member

BigTex4x4

Posted
Posted

If you google class action lawsuit filed against GM for bad transmissions it pops up multiple articles. The suit was filed September 30 2019 by Cohen Milstein for the 8L90 and 8L45 transmissions. My transmission is a 6 speed but still did the exact same thing that the lawsuit claims the 8 speeds do. There were multiple people trying to get GM to do a recall but they didn’t 

fishrman Enthusiast

fishrman

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, BigTex4x4 said:

I had read the threads to flush the trans fluid and use Mobil 1 and if that didn’t work to replace the torque converter, I told my mechanic (I didn’t realize that the class action suit was for the 8 speeds) that GM had made those recommendations. He said when he took the pan off of the transmission it was completely full of metal shavings and beyond repair. Truck has 75,000 so no longer has a warranty. 

Sad!! Lady with GM told me to take it to the shop again but to call her before I take it in. Hoping they plan on changing the fluid out for me even though it is the 6 speed and not the 8 as I think it has the same issue as the 8.

Snoringbear Enthusiast

Snoringbear

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, fishrman said:

Sad!! Lady with GM told me to take it to the shop again but to call her before I take it in. Hoping they plan on changing the fluid out for me even though it is the 6 speed and not the 8 as I think it has the same issue as the 8.

I had the TSB performed on my 2015 eight speed tranny with the prescribed Mobile 1Blue Stripe tranny fluid, three flushes, drive, reprogram, etc.  worked ok for awhile but gradually started making those low speed/gears hard shifts again.  But, problem wasn’t as bad as originally I must say.  However, I now do a little trick that I got off this thread awhile back, which is;  Every few days When I make my first drive of the day I start off in Manual mode and run the tranny through the gears up and down, usually 1st, 2nd, 3rd.  I have to go through three or four stop signs to get to the highway.  Anyway, tranny will make low speed shifts smoothly for a few days.  Personally, I think the low speed hard shift problem could probably be handled by reprogramming the tranny to start off in 2nd gear unless in Tow Mode.  Some high end sports cars have programmed their trannys to take off in 2nd gear unless in Sport Mode.  
Btw, did some research on a comment upstream that there’s a class action suit underway.  From what I’ve read it’s a dead issue. Ain’t nothing gonna happen. ?...

 

flyingfool Senior Enthusiast

flyingfool

Posted
Posted (edited)

did you do a bench test on the TECH-M? make sure there are no leaks and all check valves are holding,  I would leave it in Manual 4-5th also play with tow haul to increase line pressure to clutches

definatly needs proper trans professional to diagnose

 

there are two model torque converters, one is a dud, and the other one is semi reliable. you can also try a converter from the 6 speed ZL1 camaro, its built better and has  around 2300-2500 stall

Edited by flyingfool
  • 3 weeks later...
BDB001 New Member

BDB001

Posted
Posted

Hi, It's my first time on any forum and I'm sure it's been said before but my truck is a lemon!! I own a 2018 gmc sierra 1500 elevation edition with a 4.3l and six speed trans. I've had every vibration has most of you, from the vibration when it falls on 4cyl in every situation, worst when running at approx 50 to 70kmh. I have the vibration when running more than 60 kmh and worst as a get to 100 kmh, sometimes it gets so bad I have drop under 100kmh. I also have a bad vibration under my feet and gas pedal when I'm at 2000rpm, so there's always a vibration present. I brought it at the dealer at least 3-4 times but the service manager says every time that the problem wasn't present when the tech tried it out. Once I tried it out with the tech and he told me they knew there was a problem but gm tells them not tempt any repairs, then that same service manager tells me it's normal. I even told the sales manager that I'd like to trade it in even if I loose money, even the dealer doesn't want it cause she told me she'd take pictures and try a wholesaler. so I got screwed when I bought it and I'll get screwed when I change it. It feels good just saying it, thanks for that... 

Bikemobile Enthusiast

Bikemobile

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, BDB001 said:

Hi, It's my first time on any forum and I'm sure it's been said before but my truck is a lemon!! I own a 2018 gmc sierra 1500 elevation edition with a 4.3l and six speed trans. I've had every vibration has most of you, from the vibration when it falls on 4cyl in every situation, worst when running at approx 50 to 70kmh. I have the vibration when running more than 60 kmh and worst as a get to 100 kmh, sometimes it gets so bad I have drop under 100kmh. I also have a bad vibration under my feet and gas pedal when I'm at 2000rpm, so there's always a vibration present. I brought it at the dealer at least 3-4 times but the service manager says every time that the problem wasn't present when the tech tried it out. Once I tried it out with the tech and he told me they knew there was a problem but gm tells them not tempt any repairs, then that same service manager tells me it's normal. I even told the sales manager that I'd like to trade it in even if I loose money, even the dealer doesn't want it cause she told me she'd take pictures and try a wholesaler. so I got screwed when I bought it and I'll get screwed when I change it. It feels good just saying it, thanks for that... 

A comprehensive tire balance ( actually make them move the tires on the rims to get the lowest weight possible) and a tune deleting the AFM has made my truck 1000 times better. Its worth a try if you have to keep it. 

  • 4 weeks later...
FredB New Member

FredB

Posted
Posted

My 2018 Chevy Colorado has the Chevy Shack. I called GM and was told there are no recalls but if I took it to a GM dealer the transmission was still under warranty.

Mattfi1 New Member

Mattfi1

Posted
Posted

I have a 2018 Chevy 2500 Express Van with a Explorer conversion and I am having a severe right front end vibration after I hit a bump or pothole.  It has happen at 65 mph and again at 45 mph.  The dealer has said it was the transmission and he changed the fluid and filter.  Well 200 miles later I had it again.  Not sure what to do but I'm contacting the dealer again and see what they say this time.  [email protected]

Drew71 New Member

Drew71

Posted
Posted
On 8/5/2013 at 11:48 PM, Stex said:

 

I have had wheel balance trouble that came and went on different roads. If it rides smooth on smooth roads and seems out of it on not so smooth roads it could be balance. Rough on smooth roads with passenger seat shaking is rear balance or drive shaft,

 

Did the dealer check to see if tires out of round? Even discount tire has replace a Michelin for me that my independent on the truck balance shop said was to far out to even true. Discount agreed. Just hunting here. Hope solved soon.

I had the same issue. Balanced rear shaft helped a ton. Can't tell if it took it all as I have worked rotors to replace too. But definitely made a drastic improvement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...